New Vegas a 7.5 ... really??

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Getix-01
Getix-01

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#1 Getix-01
Member since 2007 • 454 Posts

I've been playing through new vegas and personally I've encountered next no glitches at all, and the main story is just as good as fallout 3. I honestly don't understand how gamespot could rate this game a 7.5, maybe there are glitches bit they're being patched, i think the game deserves at least a 8.5.

and IMO i just think the glitches are being getting attention from people who don't actually have the game just say " OMG this is the glitchiest game ever because i follow the reviews and don't have an opinion of my own ...baaaaa" :P . Then a few guys who have actually purchased the game come along and re-assure them that its not a glitchy as they think, but dont feed the trolls LOL

Avatar image for DeadpoolQ8
DeadpoolQ8

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DeadpoolQ8
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Man you are 100% correct the game deserves a better score and the glitchs dont deserve that much attention all games have glitchs not just fallout i hope if people stop whining about that
Avatar image for Getix-01
Getix-01

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#4 Getix-01
Member since 2007 • 454 Posts
Man you are 100% correct the game deserves a better score and the glitchs dont deserve that much attention all games have glitchs not just fallout i hope if people stop whining about that DeadpoolQ8
I hope they stop complaining too, I would rather have another great fallout game with a few glitches and errors that get fixed quickly than to have the game delayed a month or two to fix them.
Avatar image for Getix-01
Getix-01

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#5 Getix-01
Member since 2007 • 454 Posts

I have played about 2 hours and haven't encountered any major glitches, good game so far.

MuddyMilkshake
It gets better once you get further into the story, trust me :)
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
Funny how the three complaints could easily be said about both Oblivion and Fallout 3 but since Bethesda didn't develop it bugs just aren't allowed. That is rather funny since I encountered two game breaking glitches in Fallout 3 but it got a 9. Gamespot should never be trusted when it comes to reviews.
Avatar image for DeadpoolQ8
DeadpoolQ8

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DeadpoolQ8
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="DeadpoolQ8"]Man you are 100% correct the game deserves a better score and the glitchs dont deserve that much attention all games have glitchs not just fallout i hope if people stop whining about that Getix-01
I hope they stop complaining too, I would rather have another great fallout game with a few glitches and errors that get fixed quickly than to have the game delayed a month or two to fix them.

yeah some games are being delayed two months every two months ( no reference to GT5) :p anyways i think that New Vegas is a turning point for the series I hope if we see more fallout games in the future we cant get enough from fallout
Avatar image for nottu
nottu

951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 nottu
Member since 2010 • 951 Posts
New Vegas doesn't deserve great reviews, it's worse then Fallout 3 and has more glitches then F3 when it released. The graphics are the same, and the world other then the strip looks the same. The RT shooting still doesn't feel right. The story is extremely weak. It deserves the scores it got.
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#9 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

I've encountered a few glitches, nothing major or game breaking but some very, very irritating things. Quite frankly, it's unacceptable. Obsidian made zero changes to the engine and added in fine aiming and weapon mods. New Vegas feels like a massive expansion rather than a new title, so the glitches I've encountered are ridiculous given this game should have been polished way more before release date.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="DeadpoolQ8"]Man you are 100% correct the game deserves a better score and the glitchs dont deserve that much attention all games have glitchs not just fallout i hope if people stop whining about that Getix-01
I hope they stop complaining too, I would rather have another great fallout game with a few glitches and errors that get fixed quickly than to have the game delayed a month or two to fix them.

So you want broken games at a faster pace

Awesome

Avatar image for Getix-01
Getix-01

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#11 Getix-01
Member since 2007 • 454 Posts
Funny how the three complaints could easily be said about both Oblivion and Fallout 3 but since Bethesda didn't develop it bugs just aren't allowed. That is rather funny since I encountered two game breaking glitches in Fallout 3 but it got a 9. Gamespot should never be trusted when it comes to reviews.craigalan23
I Just noticed thanks to you :P, From now on i'm going to listen to IGN at least they update their site with movie and game news constantly, one of the things gamespot doesn't do lol. I really do think that they should review the score even with the updates. A game that they hyped with so many previews etc, and then they decide to slap a 7.5 on, all of a sudden the game of the year 2008 isn't that good?
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

I really do think that they should review the score even with the updates.Getix-01

Because you don't want to give anyone the truth?

The game that everyone gets from the store is the one they reviewed, now for some reason you seem set that places lie about the game but Gamespot does/will not.

New Vegas failed, it needed more work and they couldn't be bothered

One of the biggest disappointments this generation

Avatar image for Getix-01
Getix-01

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#13 Getix-01
Member since 2007 • 454 Posts

I've encountered a few glitches, nothing major or game breaking but some very, very irritating things. Quite frankly, it's unacceptable. Obsidian made zero changes to the engine and added in fine aiming and weapon mods. New Vegas feels like a massive expansion rather than a new title, so the glitches I've encountered are ridiculous given this game should have been polished way more before release date.

IndianaPwns39
This game is only a spin-off title, it's not in the main series of fallout games, i don't think they wanted to out do fallout 3 in any way only make it just as good. As for the engine, i would expect that bethesda are updating the graphics engine and all gameplay mechanics for the next game they develop ( fingers crossed for the elder scrolls V ) hence why they didn't develop new vegas themselves.
Avatar image for Getix-01
Getix-01

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#14 Getix-01
Member since 2007 • 454 Posts

[QUOTE="Getix-01"] I really do think that they should review the score even with the updates.Jaysonguy

Because you don't want to give anyone the truth?

The game that everyone gets from the store is the one they reviewed, now for some reason you seem set that places lie about the game but Gamespot does/will not.

New Vegas failed, it needed more work and they couldn't be bothered

One of the biggest disappointments this generation

A game that every gets from stores that has since and is still being updated there fore improving the experience
Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

Funny how the three complaints could easily be said about both Oblivion and Fallout 3 but since Bethesda didn't develop it bugs just aren't allowed. That is rather funny since I encountered two game breaking glitches in Fallout 3 but it got a 9. Gamespot should never be trusted when it comes to reviews.craigalan23

It deserved a 9 and it deserved game of the year it was and is a great game probably one of the best on the xbox 360. I never had ONE issue with fallout 3 and so far new vegas has only froze 1 time since i have been playing it and 2 patches have been released since then so i dont see me having any more issues with it. 1 freeze in 100 hours is nothing to cry about...

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="Getix-01"] I really do think that they should review the score even with the updates.Getix-01

Because you don't want to give anyone the truth?

The game that everyone gets from the store is the one they reviewed, now for some reason you seem set that places lie about the game but Gamespot does/will not.

New Vegas failed, it needed more work and they couldn't be bothered

One of the biggest disappointments this generation

A game that every gets from stores that has since and is still being updated there fore improving the experience

Nope, not everyone is able to update the games, that's why they have to be working out of the box

Unless you show me some conclusive evidence that all 360's are connected to the internet and are able to download as many updates as needed

Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

[QUOTE="Getix-01"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Because you don't want to give anyone the truth?

The game that everyone gets from the store is the one they reviewed, now for some reason you seem set that places lie about the game but Gamespot does/will not.

New Vegas failed, it needed more work and they couldn't be bothered

One of the biggest disappointments this generation

Jaysonguy

A game that every gets from stores that has since and is still being updated there fore improving the experience

Nope, not everyone is able to update the games, that's why they have to be working out of the box

Unless you show me some conclusive evidence that all 360's are connected to the internet and are able to download as many updates as needed

I agree with him that not every xbox is online and can download the patches so they are right to review the game out of the box. Do i think it deserved a 7.5? No...

Avatar image for Xbox360Gamer15
Xbox360Gamer15

3937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 Xbox360Gamer15
Member since 2009 • 3937 Posts
New Vegas doesn't deserve great reviews, it's worse then Fallout 3 and has more glitches then F3 when it released. The graphics are the same, and the world other then the strip looks the same. The RT shooting still doesn't feel right. The story is extremely weak. It deserves the scores it got.nottu
stop complaining....
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#19 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

[QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

I've encountered a few glitches, nothing major or game breaking but some very, very irritating things. Quite frankly, it's unacceptable. Obsidian made zero changes to the engine and added in fine aiming and weapon mods. New Vegas feels like a massive expansion rather than a new title, so the glitches I've encountered are ridiculous given this game should have been polished way more before release date.

Getix-01

This game is only a spin-off title, it's not in the main series of fallout games, i don't think they wanted to out do fallout 3 in any way only make it just as good. As for the engine, i would expect that bethesda are updating the graphics engine and all gameplay mechanics for the next game they develop ( fingers crossed for the elder scrolls V ) hence why they didn't develop new vegas themselves.

But they didn't make it as good... I'm not trashing the game because it doesn't have a new engine, I'm saying that it's ridiculous there are that many bugs/glitches when Obsidian didn't have to focus on engine developments, they just had to polish what Bethesda did in 2008 and they failed. And why does it matter if it's a spin off? It's still a game with a 2 year development cycle that's loaded with bugs and a distinct lack of improvements.

Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

[QUOTE="Getix-01"][QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

I've encountered a few glitches, nothing major or game breaking but some very, very irritating things. Quite frankly, it's unacceptable. Obsidian made zero changes to the engine and added in fine aiming and weapon mods. New Vegas feels like a massive expansion rather than a new title, so the glitches I've encountered are ridiculous given this game should have been polished way more before release date.

IndianaPwns39

This game is only a spin-off title, it's not in the main series of fallout games, i don't think they wanted to out do fallout 3 in any way only make it just as good. As for the engine, i would expect that bethesda are updating the graphics engine and all gameplay mechanics for the next game they develop ( fingers crossed for the elder scrolls V ) hence why they didn't develop new vegas themselves.

But they didn't make it as good... I'm not trashing the game because it doesn't have a new engine, I'm saying that it's ridiculous there are that many bugs/glitches when Obsidian didn't have to focus on engine developments, they just had to polish what Bethesda did in 2008 and they failed. And why does it matter if it's a spin off? It's still a game with a 2 year development cycle that's loaded with bugs and a distinct lack of improvements.

We all knew it would have the same engine that is why it only took 2 years? This game only 8 hours in is way better than fallout 3 it has only froze 1 time since i started playing and other than that no bugs or anything for me at all. What is ridiculous is you bashing a game saying they didnt have to work on an engine so it should have been flawless... UH HELLO it isnt washington D.C anymore bro? It is a new world, new monsters, new guns, iron sights, hardcore mode, new gameplay, better story, better missions, a great faction rep system, a crafting system, your weapons actually have to do enough damage to puncture armor now, new weapon mods, new bullets that do various things such as pierce armor, it is a MUCH better game like i said before. I love fallout 3 it is probably my favorite game this gen and fallout new vegas has exceeded ALL of my expectations. People need to stop bashing a great game for real other sites have given this game rave reviews despite bugs. Not only that the developer is releasing patches for the game to fix EVERYTHING so for the people who haven't bought it yet they wont even notice ANY bugs because by the time they buy it it will be patched... Most developers would just take the bad scores and say screw the people who already bought it. Honestly i am never trusting gamespot for reviews ever again because of this whole flaming drama fest that has ensued.

Avatar image for Chaay
Chaay

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Chaay
Member since 2007 • 320 Posts

Nope, not everyone is able to update the games, that's why they have to be working out of the box

Unless you show me some conclusive evidence that all 360's are connected to the internet and are able to download as many updates as needed

Jaysonguy

This. Unless Obsidian starts providing Internet for its customers, expect critics to keep their scores unchanged.

Avatar image for HipnotiKal
HipnotiKal

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 HipnotiKal
Member since 2005 • 157 Posts
my friend has it and said it's really good. he also said there are some bugs but "nothing major".
Avatar image for Twisted-Ice-God
Twisted-Ice-God

755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Twisted-Ice-God
Member since 2008 • 755 Posts

for all those who say it needs "polish" do you realize how huge this game is, thats why oblivion and fo3 both were glitchy, but no one seemed to cry and whine so much about this game, do people not realize how hard it is to build a game of this magnitude, this isnt like madden or nba its a huge undertaking to do what they have done. heck look at the original fallout and fallout 2, there are still patches that the community are putting out to fix things and put cut content back in and that game is how old? people want a game that should take 4-5 yrs to develop in 2, come on, its worth 60 bucks, its not fallout 4, but it never tried to be. its simply the same fo3 set in a different place and with a few modifications and new enemies weapons and all kinds of fun quest, so why complain, why on earth cant people be happy with all the work that has been put into this game, no one said fallout is nuclear version of oblivion, heck they are almost same game... no because we are greedy and want new new new, cant handle the concept of companies bringing you a good game in a short time by using existing engine and in this case textures to make the game... im gonna stop my blood pressure is already high enough, so people quitchabichin!

Avatar image for Mr-Gingersnaps
Mr-Gingersnaps

578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 Mr-Gingersnaps
Member since 2007 • 578 Posts

[QUOTE="Getix-01"] I really do think that they should review the score even with the updates.Jaysonguy

Because you don't want to give anyone the truth?

The game that everyone gets from the store is the one they reviewed, now for some reason you seem set that places lie about the game but Gamespot does/will not.

New Vegas failed, it needed more work and they couldn't be bothered

One of the biggest disappointments this generation

Are you kidding? it's one of the best games, it takes everything from fallout 3 and upgrades it... well except for the graphics lol i agree that it's glitchy and some people wont be able to fix it but, seriously? biggest disappointments of this generation? i dont think so.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

Its just an ad-on pack, didn't deserve the hype. its brutal rating was deserved IMO

Avatar image for nottu
nottu

951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 nottu
Member since 2010 • 951 Posts
So according to many of you, people should not complain when there is something wrong with a game. Would you prefer that no one complains, and then have no information out there on it? I'd rather read tons of complaints then buy a broken game with no prior knowledge. If you're sick of people complaining STOP READING their comments. If you had no bugs good for you, other people had bugs, and it's their right to complain about those bugs, so that they will be fixed. EDIT: spelling
Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

Its just an ad-on pack, didn't deserve the hype. its brutal rating was deserved IMO

Overlord93

Spoken like someone who hasn't played the game.

Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

So according to many of you, people should not complain when there is something wrong with a game. Would you prefer that no one complains, and then have no information out there on it? I'd rather read tons of complaints then buy a broken game with no prior knowledge. If you're sick of people complaining STOP READING their comments. If you had no bugs good for you, other people had bugs, and it's their right to complain about those bugs, so that they will be fixed. EDIT: spellingnottu

There is nothing wrong with the game i had 1 freeze in 8 hours of gameplay and have had NO other bugs or glitches at all since then. The developer is putting out patches and the game will be fixed before half of the people that want to buy the game actually buy it... And yes i would prefer that no one complains about anything, we got the review already we know it has bugs dont flood the forum with random BS when you have not even played the game before...

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

[QUOTE="Overlord93"]

Its just an ad-on pack, didn't deserve the hype. its brutal rating was deserved IMO

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

Spoken like someone who hasn't played the game.

good job detective. it is an opinion based soley off second hand information I have recieved from others
Avatar image for nottu
nottu

951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 nottu
Member since 2010 • 951 Posts

[QUOTE="nottu"]So according to many of you, people should not complain when there is something wrong with a game. Would you prefer that no one complains, and then have no information out there on it? I'd rather read tons of complaints then buy a broken game with no prior knowledge. If you're sick of people complaining STOP READING their comments. If you had no bugs good for you, other people had bugs, and it's their right to complain about those bugs, so that they will be fixed. EDIT: spellingZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

There is nothing wrong with the game i had 1 freeze in 8 hours of gameplay and have had NO other bugs or glitches at all since then. The developer is putting out patches and the game will be fixed before half of the people that want to buy the game actually buy it... And yes i would prefer that no one complains about anything, we got the review already we know it has bugs dont flood the forum with random BS when you have not even played the game before...

Actually I did play it, and it crashed twice in the 5 hours that I played. Like I said STOP READING the comments if you're sick of the complaining. Some people actually want to know what's wrong with the game. Complaining about people that are talking about bugs within a game is pointless.
Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

[QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

[QUOTE="Overlord93"]

Its just an ad-on pack, didn't deserve the hype. its brutal rating was deserved IMO

Overlord93

Spoken like someone who hasn't played the game.

good job detective. it is an opinion based soley off second hand information I have recieved from others

This is what everyone is complaining about is people like you that have never touched the game at all complaining about it. If you have not played it then you can't speak about it no one takes you seriously and all you are doing is flaming.

Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

[QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

[QUOTE="nottu"]So according to many of you, people should not complain when there is something wrong with a game. Would you prefer that no one complains, and then have no information out there on it? I'd rather read tons of complaints then buy a broken game with no prior knowledge. If you're sick of people complaining STOP READING their comments. If you had no bugs good for you, other people had bugs, and it's their right to complain about those bugs, so that they will be fixed. EDIT: spellingnottu

There is nothing wrong with the game i had 1 freeze in 8 hours of gameplay and have had NO other bugs or glitches at all since then. The developer is putting out patches and the game will be fixed before half of the people that want to buy the game actually buy it... And yes i would prefer that no one complains about anything, we got the review already we know it has bugs dont flood the forum with random BS when you have not even played the game before...

Actually I did play it, and it crashed twice in the 5 hours that I played. Like I said STOP READING the comments if you're sick of the complaining. Some people actually want to know what's wrong with the game. Complaining about people that are talking about bugs within a game is pointless.

I wasn't saying you personally i was talking about people like the teddy bear kid that posted a few posts ago. People like him that have never touched the game at all come on this forum and complain about it even though they never played it at all. What bugs? What glitches? I mean i could be wrong here but 8 hours and 1 freeze is nothing to right home about most games have issues far greater than that. Like you said people want to know what is wrong with it but you get false accusations from people like teddy bear boy down there that make people think differently about the game. It is like me commenting on a movie i have never seen are you going to beleive what i have to say about it, no... I am going to defend this game because the forum trolls are out in full force trying to bash a great game that got a bad score on one site. This game is NOT a 7.5...

Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#33 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

[QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

[QUOTE="Getix-01"] This game is only a spin-off title, it's not in the main series of fallout games, i don't think they wanted to out do fallout 3 in any way only make it just as good. As for the engine, i would expect that bethesda are updating the graphics engine and all gameplay mechanics for the next game they develop ( fingers crossed for the elder scrolls V ) hence why they didn't develop new vegas themselves. ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

But they didn't make it as good... I'm not trashing the game because it doesn't have a new engine, I'm saying that it's ridiculous there are that many bugs/glitches when Obsidian didn't have to focus on engine developments, they just had to polish what Bethesda did in 2008 and they failed. And why does it matter if it's a spin off? It's still a game with a 2 year development cycle that's loaded with bugs and a distinct lack of improvements.

We all knew it would have the same engine that is why it only took 2 years? This game only 8 hours in is way better than fallout 3 it has only froze 1 time since i started playing and other than that no bugs or anything for me at all. What is ridiculous is you bashing a game saying they didnt have to work on an engine so it should have been flawless... UH HELLO it isnt washington D.C anymore bro? It is a new world, new monsters, new guns, iron sights, hardcore mode, new gameplay, better story, better missions, a great faction rep system, a crafting system, your weapons actually have to do enough damage to puncture armor now, new weapon mods, new bullets that do various things such as pierce armor, it is a MUCH better game like i said before. I love fallout 3 it is probably my favorite game this gen and fallout new vegas has exceeded ALL of my expectations. People need to stop bashing a great game for real other sites have given this game rave reviews despite bugs. Not only that the developer is releasing patches for the game to fix EVERYTHING so for the people who haven't bought it yet they wont even notice ANY bugs because by the time they buy it it will be patched... Most developers would just take the bad scores and say screw the people who already bought it. Honestly i am never trusting gamespot for reviews ever again because of this whole flaming drama fest that has ensued.

Umm no. That's the short answer. I'm not saying it should have been flawless, I'm saying that these glaring problems should have been fixed. You've played it for 8 hours with one freeze and you're comparing it to a reviewer who played the entire thing through? That's a senseless argument. I'm not even going to bother explaining how you have no basis for your complaint.

The faction rep system is a great addition. The lack of choice in Fallout 3 was something that really needed to be fixed. But your other reasons, better missions, better story. No, those things have nothing to do with the development cycle, that's your opinion. The crafting system is a tweak. It isn't some giant thing that took forever to add into the game. It's a simple little modification. As is fine aiming, making some new guns and crafting some new monsters. It astonishes me, that it took them two years to add these things on a solidified engine that they didn't have to tweak and somehow there's bugs galore. Even though these exact same features were made in a few months by the Fallout 3 modding community. What it boils down to, is that modders in their spare time are superior to Obsidian's development team. Hardcore mode, armor puncture, these aren't hard to add. You just have to tweak the game a little bit. Are they cool additions? You bet. Is it hard to implement? Not really.

I'm not attacking New Vegas' core game. I'm enjoying the game. All I'm saying is that people are attacking Gamespot's review even though there were legitimate concerns. You're 8 hours into with one freeze? I'm 22 hours into it with around 15, a corrupted save file, and 3 quests that didn't activate. The only reason I even found out about one is because my friend asked me if I did it.

And for the record, patches don't magically make the game on the shelves instantly better. Not everyone has an internet connection, the review properly reflects the product on the shelf. I'm sure that Kevin V also reviewed different copies. As I'm playing on the 360 and PS3 at the moment and I've had the same problems with both.

The story is good, the little modifications are great, but don't blindly defend the game when there are problems with the final product. It would be awesome if you made it through the whole game with one freeze, but the majority of players are having problems with it. It doesn't make them liars, it's just how it is.

Also, no, most developers don't just stop supporting games. Patches are often released and developers support a single title for years to come. The only time a company doesn't support a game is if it doesn't sell well or they weren't large in the first place and aren't capable of fixing it.

Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

[QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

[QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

But they didn't make it as good... I'm not trashing the game because it doesn't have a new engine, I'm saying that it's ridiculous there are that many bugs/glitches when Obsidian didn't have to focus on engine developments, they just had to polish what Bethesda did in 2008 and they failed. And why does it matter if it's a spin off? It's still a game with a 2 year development cycle that's loaded with bugs and a distinct lack of improvements.

IndianaPwns39

We all knew it would have the same engine that is why it only took 2 years? This game only 8 hours in is way better than fallout 3 it has only froze 1 time since i started playing and other than that no bugs or anything for me at all. What is ridiculous is you bashing a game saying they didnt have to work on an engine so it should have been flawless... UH HELLO it isnt washington D.C anymore bro? It is a new world, new monsters, new guns, iron sights, hardcore mode, new gameplay, better story, better missions, a great faction rep system, a crafting system, your weapons actually have to do enough damage to puncture armor now, new weapon mods, new bullets that do various things such as pierce armor, it is a MUCH better game like i said before. I love fallout 3 it is probably my favorite game this gen and fallout new vegas has exceeded ALL of my expectations. People need to stop bashing a great game for real other sites have given this game rave reviews despite bugs. Not only that the developer is releasing patches for the game to fix EVERYTHING so for the people who haven't bought it yet they wont even notice ANY bugs because by the time they buy it it will be patched... Most developers would just take the bad scores and say screw the people who already bought it. Honestly i am never trusting gamespot for reviews ever again because of this whole flaming drama fest that has ensued.

Umm no. That's the short answer. I'm not saying it should have been flawless, I'm saying that these glaring problems should have been fixed. You've played it for 8 hours with one freeze and you're comparing it to a reviewer who played the entire thing through? That's a senseless argument. I'm not even going to bother explaining how you have no basis for your complaint.

The faction rep system is a great addition. The lack of choice in Fallout 3 was something that really needed to be fixed. But your other reasons, better missions, better story. No, those things have nothing to do with the development cycle, that's your opinion. The crafting system is a tweak. It isn't some giant thing that took forever to add into the game. It's a simple little modification. As is fine aiming, making some new guns and crafting some new monsters. It astonishes me, that it took them two years to add these things on a solidified engine that they didn't have to tweak and somehow there's bugs galore. Even though these exact same features were made in a few months by the Fallout 3 modding community. What it boils down to, is that modders in their spare time are superior to Obsidian's development team. Hardcore mode, armor puncture, these aren't hard to add. You just have to tweak the game a little bit. Are they cool additions? You bet. Is it hard to implement? Not really.

I'm not attacking New Vegas' core game. I'm enjoying the game. All I'm saying is that people are attacking Gamespot's review even though there were legitimate concerns. You're 8 hours into with one freeze? I'm 22 hours into it with around 15, a corrupted save file, and 3 quests that didn't activate. The only reason I even found out about one is because my friend asked me if I did it.

And for the record, patches don't magically make the game on the shelves instantly better. Not everyone has an internet connection, the review properly reflects the product on the shelf. I'm sure that Kevin V also reviewed different copies. As I'm playing on the 360 and PS3 at the moment and I've had the same problems with both.

The story is good, the little modifications are great, but don't blindly defend the game when there are problems with the final product. It would be awesome if you made it through the whole game with one freeze, but the majority of players are having problems with it. It doesn't make them liars, it's just how it is.

Also, no, most developers don't just stop supporting games. Patches are often released and developers support a single title for years to come. The only time a company doesn't support a game is if it doesn't sell well or they weren't large in the first place and aren't capable of fixing it.

Too bad you didn't read the rest of your thread because I had already stated people dont have internet connections and can't update the game with a patch.

Also i never said anything about anyone having glitches i spoke about people bashing the game that have neve played it like teddy bear guy down below which again i am sure you never read.

Your statement about developers that stop supporting game is pretty much a reflection word for word of what i had said sooooo i dont get what you are going for there.

It is a brand new game they didnt just copy and past sh!t I can tell you are lying out of your butt about freezing 15 times as well learn to stop b!tching about a great game no one cares about your opinion anyways. :P

Avatar image for SpArKs424
SpArKs424

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 SpArKs424
Member since 2010 • 2203 Posts

Just remember People to think for yourselves i mean the review is only the reviewers opinion . they arent you this game looks awesome ignore the Scores and negative talk its a solid Title .

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde

12935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 82

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
Member since 2005 • 12935 Posts
I think that review is pathetic. I have not encountered any game breaking glitches at all, and the stuff that I have encountered is extremely minor. I'm absolutely loving this game. The weapon mods, ammo types, new enemies, iron sights etc etc are making me love this game more than FO3.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="Getix-01"] I really do think that they should review the score even with the updates.Getix-01

Because you don't want to give anyone the truth?

The game that everyone gets from the store is the one they reviewed, now for some reason you seem set that places lie about the game but Gamespot does/will not.

New Vegas failed, it needed more work and they couldn't be bothered

One of the biggest disappointments this generation

A game that every gets from stores that has since and is still being updated there fore improving the experience

so what your saying is that websites should keep updating the games scores with every patch thats released? how bout DLC? should that get tacked on too? and most gamers i know would much prefer a finished game a month late, than a glitchy/broken game a month early
Avatar image for Headpopper333
Headpopper333

924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Headpopper333
Member since 2009 • 924 Posts

I've been playing through new vegas and personally I've encountered next no glitches at all, and the main story is just as good as fallout 3. I honestly don't understand how gamespot could rate this game a 7.5, maybe there are glitches bit they're being patched, i think the game deserves at least a 8.5.

and IMO i just think the glitches are being getting attention from people who don't actually have the game just say " OMG this is the glitchiest game ever because i follow the reviews and don't have an opinion of my own ...baaaaa" :P . Then a few guys who have actually purchased the game come along and re-assure them that its not a glitchy as they think, but dont feed the trolls LOL

Getix-01

Yea I was one of those people and I admit I was wrong and the game is awesome. In all fairness though I was wary of screen tearing in the game and if Obsidian was going to be able to make the game comparable to Fallout 3 which they most certainly did.

Avatar image for Headpopper333
Headpopper333

924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Headpopper333
Member since 2009 • 924 Posts

I think that review is pathetic. I have not encountered any game breaking glitches at all, and the stuff that I have encountered is extremely minor. I'm absolutely loving this game. The weapon mods, ammo types, new enemies, iron sights etc etc are making me love this game more than FO3.hillelslovak

The glitches will most likely be different for everyone and they did say it's worse later in the game. I do agree wtih the second half of your statement however. The game improved a lot and added tons of cool shiit.

Avatar image for gruntpocalypse
gruntpocalypse

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gruntpocalypse
Member since 2010 • 82 Posts
It's pretty much the same game Fallout 3 was in a new setting with more bugs. It's not so much a sequel as it is just another coat of dry paint, but it's still a very fun game and Fallout fans will enjoy it. I know I'm loving it, but I have to agree with the review. It's not a well-made game that brings much new to the series, simple as that. Still fun though.
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#41 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

Too bad you didn't read the rest of your thread because I had already stated people dont have internet connections and can't update the game with a patch.

Too bad I'm responding to what you said to me hmmm? And you did say people buying the game now won't have the problem. You quite literally said "people who haven't bought it yet they wont even notice ANY bugs because by the time they buy it it will be patched" - Oops.

Also i never said anything about anyone having glitches i spoke about people bashing the game that have neve played it like teddy bear guy down below which again i am sure you never read.

Actually, you did. Read your above post you directed at me. You have mentioned that there are some people bashing the game that hasn't played it later on in this thread, but you didn't bring that point up at all. Directed to me you basically said Gamespot's review and experience with the game is wrong.

Your statement about developers that stop supporting game is pretty much a reflection word for word of what i had said sooooo i dont get what you are going for there.

Again, you're lying. You said "Most developers would just take the bad scores and say screw the people who already bought it." Which is completely the opposite to what I said about developers supporting their games.

It is a brand new game they didnt just copy and past sh!t I can tell you are lying out of your butt about freezing 15 times as well learn to stop b!tching about a great game no one cares about your opinion anyways. :P

Yes. They did just copy and paste textures. Half of the wasteland looks the same. All the guns from Fallout 3 return. All the clothing from Fallout 3 returns. It's literally the definition of "copy and paste" but they added on some new stuff. Much like an expansion. I'm not lying about the 15 freezes. In fact I just stopped playing the game because of freeze 16. I'm not b!tching, I'm critiqing. There's a difference that you should learn. And you should stop contradicting yourself.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

Avatar image for istuffedsunny
istuffedsunny

6991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#42 istuffedsunny
Member since 2008 • 6991 Posts
I don't see why you care. Obviously review scores don't matter to fanboys, so the game will sell and they will make another. The world keeps spinning
Avatar image for meatgrinderz
meatgrinderz

1329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 meatgrinderz
Member since 2010 • 1329 Posts

its an awesome game and ive had very few glitches/freezes but the companions in the game that just disappear are really annoying. I didn't realize they were gone because I was doing some non-fighting missions and I had to go back 2 hours to get them back..sucks!

Avatar image for Cloud567kar
Cloud567kar

2656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Cloud567kar
Member since 2007 • 2656 Posts

It's their opnion, they don't score a game on what the community wants, (which they sometimes do).

Avatar image for dukerav
dukerav

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 dukerav
Member since 2003 • 2029 Posts
In all honesty, I am around 17 hours in and not really touching to much of the main questline... so far, not a glitch in sight. This is not to say that I never will, but I consider myself lucky I suppose.This is all without a patch as well.
Avatar image for aryoshi
aryoshi

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 134

User Lists: 0

#46 aryoshi
Member since 2007 • 1729 Posts
I do think it was really good and deserved more, but my problem is that I hit a game-breaking bug after some patch update the other day. Thanks to it, I cannot load my game. I heard there's supposed to be a fix for it, Tuesday. I really don't want to wait, I shouldn't have to wait. Oh well :l
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
I've played like 20+ hours and haven't had anything more than a ground texture unloading and reloading itself once. I wonder if some of these bugs are only issues that pop up when you're playing on a worn down office 360 at a video game company that uses it intensely for like 16 hours a day everyday for the past 3 years or you've been running your home system for like 24+ hours straight because you're trying to grind out a review for this game and others all within some super short amount of time.
Avatar image for JoeJoeLaker
JoeJoeLaker

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 JoeJoeLaker
Member since 2010 • 704 Posts
I love Gamespot in all, But Damn do some of the reviewed games make no sense. If this game was hyped it would for sure get a 9.0 Gamespot goes by Hype. Imo
Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

[QUOTE="Overlord93"][QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

Spoken like someone who hasn't played the game.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

good job detective. it is an opinion based soley off second hand information I have recieved from others

This is what everyone is complaining about is people like you that have never touched the game at all complaining about it. If you have not played it then you can't speak about it no one takes you seriously and all you are doing is flaming.

"IMO"

^you see these letters, yes? I did not buy the game because of my own opinion I based off what others had told me, that and I didn't like F3 that much. its not flaming :roll:

Avatar image for EvilSelf
EvilSelf

3619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#50 EvilSelf
Member since 2010 • 3619 Posts

I dont know what the fuss is about. There are people who finished the game with no game breaking glitches, there are people who did have glitches and so on and forth. But i bought it minute one, have slept only like 3 hours a day since release, have nejoyed everything in the game, which is so addictive and do i regret it? No. New Vegas is an amazing game, with as many glitches as Fallout 3 and Oblivion on release date. Keep listening to whatever the reviews say...you might as well miss out on great games out there like Fallout New Vegas, Metro 2033, Army of Two, or Deadly Premonition...