Next gen games are not that great ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for wujachi
wujachi

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 wujachi
Member since 2005 • 48 Posts

is it just me or the most next gen games are boring ? dont get me wrong if you look at AAA titels like GOW , Bioshock, Assasins Creed, Halo3 enz..... if youb play them for the first time there all blast from begining till end but after beating them i dont really wont to play them over again , maybe they should make more unlokable content in the game and not only give achievment points because after getting most of the achievments in the game i loose interest in game

Avatar image for Master__Shake
Master__Shake

6214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Master__Shake
Member since 2002 • 6214 Posts

is it just me or the most next gen games are boring ? dont get me wrong if you look at AAA titels like GOW , Bioshock, Assasins Creed, Halo3 enz..... if youb play them for the first time there all blast from begining till end but after beating them i dont really wont to play them over again , maybe they should make more unlokable content in the game and not only give achievment points because after getting most of the achievments in the game i loose interest in game

wujachi

BEcause of achievements I'm more likely to play a game to the end than I was prviously.

Avatar image for KaotiK_un_basic
KaotiK_un_basic

2128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KaotiK_un_basic
Member since 2002 • 2128 Posts
that's why i usually stick with games that have good multiplayer.
Avatar image for seventy5cent832
seventy5cent832

1057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 seventy5cent832
Member since 2007 • 1057 Posts
try something like CoD4 that is LONG
Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts

is it just me or the most next gen games are boring ? dont get me wrong if you look at AAA titels like GOW , Bioshock, Assasins Creed, Halo3 enz..... if youb play them for the first time there all blast from begining till end but after beating them i dont really wont to play them over again , maybe they should make more unlokable content in the game and not only give achievment points because after getting most of the achievments in the game i loose interest in game

wujachi

I disagree with you 100%. There are plenty of games that I find are worth playing through repeated times, and not just for achievements. I'll replay Halo 3 2-3 times, BioShock, The Darkness, Call of Duty 4. I've already finished Gears of War 3 times on the 360, now I'm going through it on the PC.

I think you're dead wrong.

Avatar image for Fredrick2003x
Fredrick2003x

2056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Fredrick2003x
Member since 2005 • 2056 Posts

I got moderated for posting this comment earlier... I don't know why... I mean it didn't seem like I was doing anything wrong.

And I swear, I am NOT trolling.

What I said was "I can't think of any Xbox 360 games that I would put into the good category without hesitation."

There are some truely remarkable games for the Xbox 360. Dead Rising and Bioshock being my two favorites by far. I have played through them many times and might do it again soon.

But something tells me in 20 years or so we won't be looking back and how these games are classics or changed the future of gaming forever.

Do you understand what I mean...?

Please don't report this.

Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts

I got moderated for posting this comment earlier... I don't know why... I mean it didn't seem like I was doing anything wrong.

And I swear, I am NOT trolling.

What I said was "I can't think of any Xbox 360 games that I would put into the good category without hesitation."

There are some truely remarkable games for the Xbox 360. Dead Rising and Bioshock being my two favorites by far. I have played through them many times and might do it again soon.

But something tells me in 20 years or so we won't be looking back and how these games are classics or changed the future of gaming forever.

Do you understand what I mean...?

Please don't report this.

Fredrick2003x

You don't see how that could be considered trolling? You basically said you don't think there are any good 360 games.

I understand your point, now that you've clarified it, but to a mod that looks like trolling. I'd re-think what you write before hitting submit.

Avatar image for Crash6
Crash6

3544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Crash6
Member since 2004 • 3544 Posts
I think Gears has the potential of being look at as a classic in the future
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="Fredrick2003x"]

I got moderated for posting this comment earlier... I don't know why... I mean it didn't seem like I was doing anything wrong.

And I swear, I am NOT trolling.

What I said was "I can't think of any Xbox 360 games that I would put into the good category without hesitation."

There are some truely remarkable games for the Xbox 360. Dead Rising and Bioshock being my two favorites by far. I have played through them many times and might do it again soon.

But something tells me in 20 years or so we won't be looking back and how these games are classics or changed the future of gaming forever.

Do you understand what I mean...?

Please don't report this.

Large_Soda

You don't see how that could be considered trolling? You basically said you don't think there are any good 360 games.

I understand your point, now that you've clarified it, but to a mod that looks like trolling. I'd re-think what you write before hitting submit.

He didn't say "there are no good 360 games" he said "heWOULD hesitate before instantly awarding the 'classic' term to current gen games" and those are two very different statements. The latter statement means they are more geared towards average concepts instead of groundbreaking. Take Gears of war, graphcis look amazing but the story is weak, none of them are perfect, they are good, but perfect and classic worthy? ... i don't think many will get that status like tetris and packman or even golden eye on the N64.

Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts
[QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="Fredrick2003x"]

I got moderated for posting this comment earlier... I don't know why... I mean it didn't seem like I was doing anything wrong.

And I swear, I am NOT trolling.

What I said was "I can't think of any Xbox 360 games that I would put into the good category without hesitation."

There are some truely remarkable games for the Xbox 360. Dead Rising and Bioshock being my two favorites by far. I have played through them many times and might do it again soon.

But something tells me in 20 years or so we won't be looking back and how these games are classics or changed the future of gaming forever.

Do you understand what I mean...?

Please don't report this.

Phazevariance

You don't see how that could be considered trolling? You basically said you don't think there are any good 360 games.

I understand your point, now that you've clarified it, but to a mod that looks like trolling. I'd re-think what you write before hitting submit.

He didn't say "there are no good 360 games" he said "heWOULD hesitate before instantly awarding the 'classic' term to current gen games" and those are two very different statements. The latter statement means they are more geared towards average concepts instead of groundbreaking. Take Gears of war, graphcis look amazing but the story is weak, none of them are perfect, they are good, but perfect and classic worthy? ... i don't think many will get that status like tetris and packman or even golden eye on the N64.

I'm not disputing his point. I get what he said, but to a mod or to someone partial to the 360 that could read as trolling.

"I can't think of any 360 games that I would put into the good category without hesitation." That reads like "Without hesitation I can't think of any good 360 games".

Your interpretation of what he wrote was much clearer and concise than what he wrote and there is no confusing your intent. His just reads a little weird and unfortunately seems trollish.

That's all I was saying.