if you ask me a fps is pointless without multiplayer the game is over to fast for the most part the storys suck and all the replay value is in the multiplayer
if you ask me a fps is pointless without multiplayer the game is over to fast for the most part the storys suck and all the replay value is in the multiplayer
if you ask me a fps is pointless without multiplayer the game is over to fast for the most part the storys suck and all the replay value is in the multiplayer
if you ask me a fps is pointless without multiplayer the game is over to fast for the most part the storys suck and all the replay value is in the multiplayer
i'll stick to my rpgs for single player thanks
darkdragonmage9
Dude, they purposely cut out the multiplayer in order to enhance the single player content and the story is awesome as well. i admit, some fps cannot last withoutmultipalyer but this game is in a league of its own. Anyways if they did amultipalyer section, it would feel like it was just tacked on as an afterthough.
Bioshock is a great game, give the developers a break and accept it for what it is.
im so glad Bioshock doesnt have MP (at least Live MP) the areas are pretty freaking big and it would take forever to find someone to kill.Ballroompirate
true, but they could make maps out of certain parts of rapture, like say a bar. with plasmid pickups scattered round. it really wudnt be too bad
Yes for me a 20 hour single player is too short and a waist of money. Not to mention for AVERAGE gameplay its 15 hours. I was hyped about the game but im not getting it because it has no mult-player. Yes multiplayer has to do alot with it . Its after the 15 hours of game play that adds another 15. And first person shooters are expected to have multiplayer now a days....
Log in to comment