http://www.oxm.co.uk/article.php?id=5951
Promising review and it score well enough to go into their must buy section
Enjoy
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I lost faith in any OXM publications after their abysmal review of Fight Night Round 3*. Besides, their reviews are basically just outlining points from the press releases and saying 'good' or 'bad' on each one of them. Sad, really.
*(Seriously? That game gets a ten? Nobody plays it for more than a few days, and the fighting mechanics are super-duper cheap)
well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10TX360
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
[QUOTE="TX360"]well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10Jaysonguy
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
I never said it was real i meant that the review score makes sense thats what i meant by realistic
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TX360"]well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10TX360
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
I never said it was real i meant that the review score makes sense thats what i meant by realistic
So wait, IGN's score of 7.9 isn't trusting or "realistic", compared to this score of 8... its a .1 difference, and plus any game 7 and above is a usually must buy as long as your interested in it, 7 is good, not average, not bad. 7.9 is better, and 8 is great, the game looks awesome, although I agree with a lot you've said, I hate nitpickers and glitches and bugs never ruin games for me.[QUOTE="TX360"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TX360"]well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10xgamer40
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
I never said it was real i meant that the review score makes sense thats what i meant by realistic
So wait, IGN's score of 7.9 isn't trusting or "realistic", compared to this score of 8... its a .1 difference, and plus any game 7 and above is a usually must buy as long as your interested in it, 7 is good, not average, not bad. 7.9 is better, and 8 is great, the game looks awesome, although I agree with a lot you've said, I hate nitpickers and glitches and bugs never ruin games for me.as i said above i meant that i trust it because ign gave basically the same review and they are a well trusted site i never meant igns was not trusting.
[QUOTE="TX360"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TX360"]well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10xgamer40
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
I never said it was real i meant that the review score makes sense thats what i meant by realistic
So wait, IGN's score of 7.9 isn't trusting or "realistic", compared to this score of 8... its a .1 difference, and plus any game 7 and above is a usually must buy as long as your interested in it, 7 is good, not average, not bad. 7.9 is better, and 8 is great, the game looks awesome, although I agree with a lot you've said, I hate nitpickers and glitches and bugs never ruin games for me.he never said that he thought IGN's score wasn't trusting or unrealistic. he said that he trusts this review because it is realistic next to IGN's 7.9
meaning IGN is such a great review site, that 7.9 and 8 are so close, so oxm reviewed it nicely as well.
[QUOTE="xgamer40"][QUOTE="TX360"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TX360"]well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10summer_star17x
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
I never said it was real i meant that the review score makes sense thats what i meant by realistic
So wait, IGN's score of 7.9 isn't trusting or "realistic", compared to this score of 8... its a .1 difference, and plus any game 7 and above is a usually must buy as long as your interested in it, 7 is good, not average, not bad. 7.9 is better, and 8 is great, the game looks awesome, although I agree with a lot you've said, I hate nitpickers and glitches and bugs never ruin games for me.he never said that he thought IGN's score wasn't trusting or unrealistic. he said that he trusts this review because it is realistic next to IGN's 7.9
meaning IGN is such a great review site, that 7.9 and 8 are so close, so oxm reviewed it nicely as well.
[QUOTE="summer_star17x"][QUOTE="xgamer40"][QUOTE="TX360"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TX360"]well i trust the review because its seems realistic next to IGNS 7.9/10xgamer40
So what you're saying is that you don't think that IGN's video is real?
The players getting injured jumping down 5 steps, fire hydrants killing tanks, players getting stuck on a bush, You think all that was doctored?
I never said it was real i meant that the review score makes sense thats what i meant by realistic
So wait, IGN's score of 7.9 isn't trusting or "realistic", compared to this score of 8... its a .1 difference, and plus any game 7 and above is a usually must buy as long as your interested in it, 7 is good, not average, not bad. 7.9 is better, and 8 is great, the game looks awesome, although I agree with a lot you've said, I hate nitpickers and glitches and bugs never ruin games for me.he never said that he thought IGN's score wasn't trusting or unrealistic. he said that he trusts this review because it is realistic next to IGN's 7.9
meaning IGN is such a great review site, that 7.9 and 8 are so close, so oxm reviewed it nicely as well.
its ok we all make mistakes .
[QUOTE="TX360"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree with this review...
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=228603
:P
Toriko42
k
I've never cared about Eurogamer and I never will. They're quite harshI personally felt the score was not very convincing considering games like superman returns got a 5/10 it just seems like the guy who reviewed it does not really like open world games
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment