Poll: If the next Call of Duty was pay to play, would you pay?

With the recent rumours of Call of Duty switching to the pay-to-play sytem that is found in World of Warcraft (a small monthly fee that is required to play online), I was wondering how many of you would actually continue to be a Call of Duty supporter. So, answer the question above and sound off below!

Nope, there are plenty of other games to play on the Xbox, and for the people that are already paying for xbox live, it would be 3 payments. The disk, Xbox live and the 'pay-to-play' payments. It would never happen unless on the PC.

Option 4: I refuse to play it when it's free to play, so hell no.

heck no, its not worth it, a)I paid for the game, B)I paid for Live, I am not paying to play, C) they would probably still charge for updates -_-

*Waits for people to say "Iwouldn't play this if for free or even if you payed me"*

Nomatter how good the game was, even nomatter which game on the xbox360.. I'll pay for Xbox Live Gold, and nothing more :b.

You don't have my option. No, I wont play it when its free, I wont play it when you have to pay.

No game is worth it, I definately wouldn't pay to play.

Absolutely not.

I don't think the the World of Warcraft monthly subscription model would work with an FPS. It would take a lot more than the odd free map, gun, etc. and unless they revolutionize the FPS genre to make it worthwhile, I don't see myself ever paying for something like that.

Well your already paying for Xbox LIVE then an extra Call of Duty Pay-To_Play.........people will only pay if the game was like perfect.

First of all they wouldn't be able to do this with the older titles so I would just stick to COD 4 or COD 5 for the rest of my Call Of Duty days, HELL NO would I ever pay extra to play COD LMAO.:lol:...

could you imagine if we had to pay a monthly fee to play MW2 lol ?

Absolutely not.

I don't think the the World of Warcraft monthly subscription model would work with an FPS. It would take a lot more than the odd free map, gun, etc. and unless they revolutionize the FPS genre to make it worthwhile, I don't see myself ever paying for something like that.

Lanezy

Bingo!

I don't think anyone will EVER develop a FPS immersive enough to make people want to pay to keep playing, even on the PC considering there are a few free FPS games that still rock today.

Where is the option for not liking Call of Duty? FPS_Gamer123

[QUOTE="Lanezy"]

Absolutely not.

I don't think the the World of Warcraft monthly subscription model would work with an FPS. It would take a lot more than the odd free map, gun, etc. and unless they revolutionize the FPS genre to make it worthwhile, I don't see myself ever paying for something like that.

Oniresurrect

Bingo!

I don't think anyone will EVER develop a FPS immersive enough to make people want to pay to keep playing, even on the PC considering there are a few free FPS games that still rock today.

It's funny that we're talking about this beacuse I just saw this on gametrailers.

It's a good discussion, but I have to disagree with the Farmville guy.

Of course not, although, either way I don't intend to play the next Call of Duty. I've played enough of them now.

As for the whole subscription stuff, I honestly doubt it's going to be pay to play. I'm betting it's just gonna be an additional subscription for additional content such as more guns, perks, kill streaks, custom classes and so on. Throwing in a subscription just to play would practically be franchise suicide when every other shooter on the market doesn't force players to pay to play. They might as well be handing over their market share to EA.

And I doubt the fee for the subscription would be high. I doubt Activision really believes theres a great deal of players on Live willing to pay much for a subscription for their game on top of the x-box Live gold they already have to pay for. They may be greedy but I doubt they're stupid.

It's funny that we're talking about this beacuse I just saw this on gametrailers.

It's a good discussion, but I have to disagree with the Farmville guy.

Lanezy

Indeed it is an interesting discussion,the most common thing that come up during it is that life is not fair (we all know that) but what they forget is that videogames were started with the idea of fun for the public fun that cost a fee but still fun I can see having to pay lets say 5$ a month to unlock the game to play it and it would change from game to game but allowing people to buy the better equipment shrinks there player pool. Take an online FPS, combat arms for example, you can play for free and you can buy special items that normally take time to unlock. this sadly makes the game a lot less fun, if you run in to someone that bought the heavy body armor and the unlimited ammo chain-gun right at the start of the new month after the point reset no matter if its all 14 players against them they will get all the kills for at least the first week of that game month only slowing the progress of anyone that didn't fork out 25$ to play.

Nope, I like the game a lot but wouldn't pay to play it.

I'm not even going to buy the next Call of Duty, no matter what time it takes place at. Infinity Ward lost me as a customer with the crumminess of MW2.

If IW were to do this it would be there worst decision they have ever made. If 900,000 people play that now that number will decrease to around 200,000 probably even less. As for me I don't even play it now so there would be no reason for me to pay for it later.

No, there will be plenty of other enjoyable FPS games out there that won't require it.

See, every CoD is the same. Buy one and you have them all. So no. Call me what you like, but it isn't the best series out there. I'm a Bioshock guy myself!

Option 4: I refuse to play it when it's free to play, so hell no.

Phoenix534

It depends on what they are offering. People don't seem to realize that they aren't going to just package Call of Duty 7 up and charge to play. It'll be its own game with extra features etc. Packaging Call of Duty 7 up, and charging 15 bucks a month would not sell. rolo107

But that's the problem isn't it? I mean, what could they offer to make it worthwhile? I don't care about maps, themes, extra guns, or whatever they decide to do unless they totally reinvent the wheel here.

No, just go back to CoD4. ;)

Where's the option for I will never pay-to-play any multiplayer game?

Hell no

i hope call of duty does not go to pay to play because if it does sadly i will not pay to play it online when im already paying for the game and xbox live and the updateslol1234wow

[QUOTE="lol1234wow"]i hope call of duty does not go to pay to play because if it does sadly i will not pay to play it online when im already paying for the game and xbox live and the updateschaoscougar1

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="lol1234wow"]i hope call of duty does not go to pay to play because if it does sadly i will not pay to play it online when im already paying for the game and xbox live and the updatesHickamie14

Why is there no "I don't like Call of Duty" option.

**** no

I highly doubt that will happen but Id be willing to pay as long as it's like $5 a month or something...I wouldnt play if it was $15 though, which I highly doubt will even happenStanley09

Not this gen.