POLL: Portable gaming system from Microsoft or not?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheRealLisaAnn
TheRealLisaAnn

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 TheRealLisaAnn
Member since 2010 • 160 Posts
I say YES. MS has the technology to make a Zune, keyboards, joysticks, and Xbox360. Why can't they do the same with a portable gaming system? Why does Apple and Sony get to have all the fun? I like the old 3 way system battles (SNES vs. Genesis vs. TurboGraphx16 AND PlayStation vs. GameCube vs. Saturn), so this makes a lot of sense.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
call me crazy, but i dont see a poll :| but otherwise no, dont really need it, the portable market is almost completely dominated by the DS anyway, should only get worse with the 3DS
Avatar image for ItsShane
ItsShane

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ItsShane
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts

call me crazy, but i dont see a poll :| but otherwise no, dont really need it, the portable market is almost completely dominated by the DS anyway, should only get worse with the 3DSchaoscougar1

Took the words right out of my mouth :P

Avatar image for deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
Member since 2006 • 6013 Posts

I say YES. MS has the technology to make a Zune, keyboards, joysticks, and Xbox360. Why can't they do the same with a portable gaming system? Why does Apple and Sony get to have all the fun? I like the old 3 way system battles (SNES vs. Genesis vs. TurboGraphx16 AND PlayStation vs. GameCube vs. Saturn), so this makes a lot of sense.TheRealLisaAnn

The PlayStation belong to the N64 and Dreamcast generation, not the Saturn and Gamecube.

The PS2 belonged to the GC and XBox gen.

And right now it's the wii, PS3, 360. We still have 3 competitors. The only thing that changed from the past is that Sega quit the console market and MS stepped in.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
Member since 2006 • 6013 Posts

And after seeing how crappy the 360 was at the beggining I wouldn't get a handheld system from then... not until a couple years after the first one hit the market.

Besides Nintendo is doing things right with the handheld market (as has always) so I don't feel the need to change my Portable gaming platform anytime soon.

Avatar image for Superkhanz
Superkhanz

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 Superkhanz
Member since 2010 • 143 Posts

Yes, they could enter the handheld warfare to mash out the 3DS and PSP2, but because of those new releases Microsoft would take a big risk.

Avatar image for NoDzombie
NoDzombie

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 NoDzombie
Member since 2009 • 1483 Posts

i think that if the PSP2 proves to be a success going up against the 3DS then Microsoft might consider developing a portable console, but even so it would still be a huge risk for them, so who knows......

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

Like it or not, that's what Windows Phone 7 is.

[QUOTE="TheRealLisaAnn"]I say YES. MS has the technology to make a Zune, keyboards, joysticks, and Xbox360. Why can't they do the same with a portable gaming system? Why does Apple and Sony get to have all the fun? I like the old 3 way system battles (SNES vs. Genesis vs. TurboGraphx16 AND PlayStation vs. GameCube vs. Saturn), so this makes a lot of sense._TheJoker_

The PlayStation belong to the N64 and Dreamcast generation, not the Saturn and Gamecube.

The PS2 belonged to the GC and XBox gen.

And right now it's the wii, PS3, 360. We still have 3 competitors. The only thing that changed from the past is that Sega quit the console market and MS stepped in.

Dreamcast is in the PS2, GC, Xbox gen(Fifth Generation). Saturn was fourth(PS1, N64, Jaguar)

Avatar image for xfactor19990
xfactor19990

10917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 xfactor19990
Member since 2004 • 10917 Posts
well sadly I think they are treating their WM7 phones as their "portable" I just wish they had a real handheld.......Halo, Gears, COD, on the GO? Yes PLEASE!
Avatar image for karma1680
karma1680

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 karma1680
Member since 2008 • 351 Posts

MS is smart enough not to go down that road. The ds has that locked down for one big reason that a lot of ppl don't even think about when trying to figure out all the reason the psp couldn't give it a challenge. MS and playstation all though have come out with many casual games and rated E for everyone type games they are the big dogs in the yard for hardcore games and machinery. When you look at the psp and psp2 you see a lot of hardware thats ideal for eveything a hardcore gamer could want, but here is the problem! between the ages of 16-40 we will say how many gamers have no life at all that they can play a portable everywhere they go for long stretches for a game like uncharted or mass effect? There are always exceptions but most of us don't have jobs that require us to travel a lot. Alot of us have familys and a lot of us drive. Because of those reasons it limits the time we have to play a portable. On the other hand 5 year old to lets say 14 year old its ideal cause they don't drive so car rides are great. When mom and dad have the tv occupied it words when going to play with friends it works on family trips it works. SO its easier for Nintendo to market to them with games that appeal to them and make a killing. I had a psp i loved it but didn't have the time to play. I drove to work. I have a thirty min lunch cant do much then. and when i get home which do you want to do pay a handheld or jump on your big screen and play online? There are many other factors to look at but this is the biggest hurtle and now its even harden when i can pull out my Iphone and play a quick game during those small windows that i do have time to play instead of trying to get deep into a game i would normally play at home. I personally wish it were different but its not.

Avatar image for Ugalde-
Ugalde-

3732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Ugalde-
Member since 2009 • 3732 Posts
I say yes because I don't want a 3DS and I hate Playstation games. I am just not a fan of any of their big games otherwise I would have gotten a PSP a long time ago. If MS came out with a hand held with some Halo and Gears I would buy it asap.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

How is this even being asked?

Microsoft has a portable gaming device, it's called the Windows 7 phone. It's not like they're hiding it either since there's ads all over TV and in magazines and the radio so really, who doesn't know that they have one?

Handheld gaming devices are dying and it's a fast death, with phones being available for younger and younger users the trend now is to make an all in one device.

You honestly have to work hard to see that Microsoft isn't in the portable gaming industry now

Avatar image for MrBelveder06
MrBelveder06

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MrBelveder06
Member since 2008 • 307 Posts

I'm not interested in a portable device at all. SO for selfish reasons alone, I hope they keep all their focus on the Xbox Console.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#14 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
I'd prefer not. Most of my gaming time is at home so have a handheld is pretty stupid for me when consoles are better.
Avatar image for MrsBlunder
MrsBlunder

126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 MrsBlunder
Member since 2011 • 126 Posts
Eh, technically... Any laptop running a Microsoft OS could be considered "portable" gaming.
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts

Nah. Sony makes the mistake of making the PSP a console and not an actual handheld.

I wouldn't want Microsoft to fall into the same mistake and then getting dominated by the DS or 3DS.

Avatar image for will-p101
will-p101

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 will-p101
Member since 2010 • 101 Posts

I hope we do get a portable *FINGERS CROSSED*

Avatar image for MrBelveder06
MrBelveder06

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 MrBelveder06
Member since 2008 • 307 Posts

You could make the arguement that there currently is a 3 way battle over portable gaming between Nintendo, Sony and Apple (ipod/ipad).

Why would Microsoft want to get into the race at this point, being so far behind the others?

I think the closest thing you will get is Microsoft supporting gaming on their Windows basesd smart phones.

Avatar image for XboxGuy1537
XboxGuy1537

2360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#19 XboxGuy1537
Member since 2010 • 2360 Posts

I'm not sure actually. It would be good to take a shot at Sony and Nintendo.

Avatar image for ColonelWilks
ColonelWilks

3149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ColonelWilks
Member since 2005 • 3149 Posts

Nah. Sony makes the mistake of making the PSP a console and not an actual handheld.

I wouldn't want Microsoft to fall into the same mistake and then getting dominated by the DS or 3DS.

Gaming-Planet
The PSP isn't a handheld? News to me.
Avatar image for Zune_HD
Zune_HD

1144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Zune_HD
Member since 2010 • 1144 Posts

How is this even being asked?

Microsoft has a portable gaming device, it's called the Windows 7 phone. It's not like they're hiding it either since there's ads all over TV and in magazines and the radio so really, who doesn't know that they have one?

Handheld gaming devices are dying and it's a fast death, with phones being available for younger and younger users the trend now is to make an all in one device.

You honestly have to work hard to see that Microsoft isn't in the portable gaming industry now

Jaysonguy
WP7 is dying a faster death than handhelds.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

How is this even being asked?

Microsoft has a portable gaming device, it's called the Windows 7 phone. It's not like they're hiding it either since there's ads all over TV and in magazines and the radio so really, who doesn't know that they have one?

Handheld gaming devices are dying and it's a fast death, with phones being available for younger and younger users the trend now is to make an all in one device.

You honestly have to work hard to see that Microsoft isn't in the portable gaming industry now

Zune_HD

WP7 is dying a faster death than handhelds.

Nope, not at all

The phone launched with sales better then expected after the Kin and the way the game section has been growing it's a full fledged success for Microsoft's portable gaming.

That's why I'm confused why people are talking about it like "if it did happen" it's already happening.

Avatar image for Alex3796
Alex3796

2669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 1

#23 Alex3796
Member since 2009 • 2669 Posts
They could do it, and I think it would sell decently well. But I wouldn't buy it.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

They could do it, and I think it would sell decently well. But I wouldn't buy it. Alex3796

They have done it and it's selling well

How do this many people not know this?

Avatar image for Zune_HD
Zune_HD

1144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Zune_HD
Member since 2010 • 1144 Posts

[QUOTE="Zune_HD"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

How is this even being asked?

Microsoft has a portable gaming device, it's called the Windows 7 phone. It's not like they're hiding it either since there's ads all over TV and in magazines and the radio so really, who doesn't know that they have one?

Handheld gaming devices are dying and it's a fast death, with phones being available for younger and younger users the trend now is to make an all in one device.

You honestly have to work hard to see that Microsoft isn't in the portable gaming industry now

Jaysonguy

WP7 is dying a faster death than handhelds.

Nope, not at all

The phone launched with sales better then expected after the Kin and the way the game section has been growing it's a full fledged success for Microsoft's portable gaming.

That's why I'm confused why people are talking about it like "if it did happen" it's already happening.

Wrong.

Avatar image for Ladigj
Ladigj

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Ladigj
Member since 2010 • 50 Posts

Microsoft could but you have to segment your market. It's already been stated that sony and nintendo dominate the portable market. If microsoft jumped in, it may be a loser for them. As successful as Apple has been, notice apple is not in the console market and microsoft is not in the portable market.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#27 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="Zune_HD"] WP7 is dying a faster death than handhelds.Zune_HD

Nope, not at all

The phone launched with sales better then expected after the Kin and the way the game section has been growing it's a full fledged success for Microsoft's portable gaming.

That's why I'm confused why people are talking about it like "if it did happen" it's already happening.

Wrong.

Yeah, about that

Nope

Also what's impressive is that they're doing this without having the two biggest carriers carry their phones yet

Avatar image for karma1680
karma1680

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 karma1680
Member since 2008 • 351 Posts

[QUOTE="Zune_HD"]

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Nope, not at all

The phone launched with sales better then expected after the Kin and the way the game section has been growing it's a full fledged success for Microsoft's portable gaming.

That's why I'm confused why people are talking about it like "if it did happen" it's already happening.

Jaysonguy

Wrong.

Yeah, about that

Nope

Also what's impressive is that they're doing this without having the two biggest carriers carry their phones yet

And thats great for them but as this convo goes its still not a real hand held gaming divice as such as the ds or psp. its a phone and even though we all know that phones are slowly killing the handheld gaming market there phone isn't even close to being on par with the Iphone so there not competeing at all in any race phone or other. But i still think with that they are doing what they expected or a lil better and is very happy about it and they should be. But as far as a full handheld built for only gaming not making calls they are smart for staying out of it.

Avatar image for Ratjack2k5
Ratjack2k5

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Ratjack2k5
Member since 2010 • 80 Posts

I personally cant stand portable gaming and I think there are already too many portables on the market. So I say NO to microsoft making a portable system.

Avatar image for sudeley5
sudeley5

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 sudeley5
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
A phone is not a dedicated gaming system, the graphics are way sub par to a portable system like the vita. So making a xbox portable would run circles around a phone.
Avatar image for insane_metalist
insane_metalist

7797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#31 insane_metalist
Member since 2006 • 7797 Posts

Am I blind? I don't see no poll.

Honestly, I could care less about MS making something portable. I'm not a big fan of portable devices. Most people game on their portable smart phones now days more then anything.

Avatar image for Megavideogamer
Megavideogamer

6554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 Megavideogamer
Member since 2004 • 6554 Posts

MS would have done it by now. It is way too late for them too even try that now.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#33 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
No, they don't make Kinect sensors that small.. yet.
Avatar image for Saedius_Asicion
Saedius_Asicion

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Saedius_Asicion
Member since 2013 • 71 Posts
I think Microsoft should just focus on the console. They really don't need to compete in the portable market when they could essentially dominate the console market, which is where most of the money is anyway. We all know that's what matters to them, and of course it will give us a better quality product if they aren't spreading themselves thin trying to keep up in both markets.