Quantaum of Solace, the Goldeneye of today?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bluebomber46
bluebomber46

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bluebomber46
Member since 2004 • 120 Posts

It's been a while since we've had a good James Bond first person shooter, think this will be any good?

Avatar image for iloverikku11
iloverikku11

11039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 iloverikku11
Member since 2005 • 11039 Posts
we will have to wait to even see some gameplay vids before we can even say it looks good. However the screenshots are very nice.
Avatar image for contaminated
contaminated

5373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#3 contaminated
Member since 2005 • 5373 Posts
treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...
Avatar image for Matt-4542
Matt-4542

8002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Matt-4542
Member since 2008 • 8002 Posts

treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...contaminated
:roll: People dont like them simply because theyre not Infinity Ward.

Anyway, I dont see how Goldeneye was good. Keep in mind I wasnt a gamer then, I dont even know if I was born before it came out (1991) so I never played it untill last year and I thought it was horrible.

Avatar image for nicknees93
nicknees93

3250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 nicknees93
Member since 2005 • 3250 Posts

It's been a while since we've had a good James Bond first person shooter, think this will be any good?

bluebomber46
okay. goldeneye... not that great of a game. if you dont believe me. go play it.
Avatar image for Rasjr20
Rasjr20

2166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Rasjr20
Member since 2007 • 2166 Posts
By todays standards Goldeneye isnt that Impressive but when it came out it was awesome, I probaly wouldnt enjoy it now though but i wont bother playing it again ill just keep the good memories
Avatar image for nicknees93
nicknees93

3250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 nicknees93
Member since 2005 • 3250 Posts
By todays standards Goldeneye isnt that Impressive but when it came out it was awesome, I probaly wouldnt enjoy it now though but i wont bother playing it again ill just keep the good memoriesRasjr20
good idea. cause if you go back now, all those good memories you speak of... OUT THE WINDOW.
Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#8 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts

[QUOTE="Rasjr20"]By todays standards Goldeneye isnt that Impressive but when it came out it was awesome, I probaly wouldnt enjoy it now though but i wont bother playing it again ill just keep the good memoriesnicknees93
good idea. cause if you go back now, all those good memories you speak of... OUT THE WINDOW.

That's bullocks. I played the game last week and it kicks ass.

Avatar image for wagepeace
wagepeace

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 wagepeace
Member since 2007 • 885 Posts

[QUOTE="nicknees93"][QUOTE="Rasjr20"]By todays standards Goldeneye isnt that Impressive but when it came out it was awesome, I probaly wouldnt enjoy it now though but i wont bother playing it again ill just keep the good memoriesGodLovesDead

good idea. cause if you go back now, all those good memories you speak of... OUT THE WINDOW.

That's bullocks. I played the game last week and it kicks ass.

it may not look like an xbox 360 game, with HD resolution and a spotfree control scheme, but how many hours did you sit around playing multiplayer with your friends, talking trash about how much better you were at that game? i know i spent plenty. that game was the reason i BOUGHT a 64.

but back to the TC, i dont know that we will ever have another "goldeneye.." today is flooded with countless copycat FPSs, so the chances of that game being recreated...in Bond style or otherwise... is few and far between IMO. thats not to say it wont be great in its own right, but something about the original was pure...something i dont think we'll see ever again.

we'll just have to wait and see.

Avatar image for Trickshot771
Trickshot771

12686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Trickshot771
Member since 2005 • 12686 Posts

[QUOTE="contaminated"]treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...Matt-4542

:roll: People dont like them simply because theyre not Infinity Ward.

Anyway, I dont see how Goldeneye was good. Keep in mind I wasnt a gamer then, I dont even know if I was born before it came out (1991) so I never played it untill last year and I thought it was horrible.

If you played it back when it came out you'd think it was the second coming of christ. Don't think something sucks just because it's old.

Avatar image for NicAgent
NicAgent

4693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#11 NicAgent
Member since 2005 • 4693 Posts

[QUOTE="contaminated"]treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...Matt-4542

:roll: People dont like them simply because theyre not Infinity Ward.

Anyway, I dont see how Goldeneye was good. Keep in mind I wasnt a gamer then, I dont even know if I was born before it came out (1991) so I never played it untill last year and I thought it was horrible.

yes, you were - goldeneye was released in 1995 and the game was in 1997, but yeah you were definitely too young to have played it well when it first came out
Avatar image for ck02623
ck02623

1534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 ck02623
Member since 2003 • 1534 Posts

[QUOTE="contaminated"]treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...Matt-4542

:roll: People dont like them simply because theyre not Infinity Ward.

Anyway, I dont see how Goldeneye was good. Keep in mind I wasnt a gamer then, I dont even know if I was born before it came out (1991) so I never played it untill last year and I thought it was horrible.

I'm going to have to disagree; look at Treyarch's other games.

Avatar image for IMonKI
IMonKI

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 IMonKI
Member since 2008 • 151 Posts
Pshhh I still go back and play Goldeneye with my roomates. Its fun even though the graphics are horrible compared to such games today like Gears of War and Oblivion. Heck I still play mario for the regular nintendo and Ocarina of Time for the N64.
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#14 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
The game sure is looking good, but there is no way of knowing how it will turn out.
Avatar image for NicAgent
NicAgent

4693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#15 NicAgent
Member since 2005 • 4693 Posts
Pshhh I still go back and play Goldeneye with my roomates. Its fun even though the graphics are horrible compared to such games today like Gears of War and Oblivion. Heck I still play mario for the regular nintendo and Ocarina of Time for the N64.IMonKI
its not really the graphics its the fact that you have to play single-analog style i mean i've tried playing goldeneye 007 on PJ64 with an Xbox 360 controller - i'll tell you it ain't easy at all to aim
Avatar image for sleepisawesome2
sleepisawesome2

1367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 sleepisawesome2
Member since 2005 • 1367 Posts
[QUOTE="Matt-4542"]

[QUOTE="contaminated"]treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...ck02623

:roll: People dont like them simply because theyre not Infinity Ward.

Anyway, I dont see how Goldeneye was good. Keep in mind I wasnt a gamer then, I dont even know if I was born before it came out (1991) so I never played it untill last year and I thought it was horrible.

I'm going to have to disagree; look at Treyarch's other games.

treyarch has a good track record and matt is right,call of duty 3 is not as good as 4 but that dosent make it a bad game and call of duty 2 big red one is not as good as call of duty 2 but its still average and it dosent suck so what other games are you talking about?

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#17 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="bluebomber46"]

It's been a while since we've had a good James Bond first person shooter, think this will be any good?

nicknees93

okay. goldeneye... not that great of a game. if you dont believe me. go play it.

*GASP* Lies! All Lies! Goldeneye 64 is one of the best FPS/movie-based shooters of all-time. How dare you! :twisted:

Avatar image for TaintedSaint666
TaintedSaint666

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 TaintedSaint666
Member since 2007 • 400 Posts
I enjoyed Nightfire. Anyway, I sure hope that it won't be rushed movie-tie in.
Avatar image for opethpwn
opethpwn

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 opethpwn
Member since 2007 • 583 Posts
I've never played a good treyarch game so I don't anticipate QoS being particularly good.
Avatar image for Strife88
Strife88

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 Strife88
Member since 2005 • 6073 Posts
The game shifts between FPS and TPS, you can't really say it's the Goldeneye of today because there's nothing confirmed about the multiplayer. The single player sounds like it's shaping up to be good and if it's anything like Everything or Nothing on the PS2 than I'll check this out day one.
Avatar image for Quintinius
Quintinius

1050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 Quintinius
Member since 2006 • 1050 Posts
[QUOTE="ck02623"][QUOTE="Matt-4542"]

[QUOTE="contaminated"]treyarch is making the game and look at their track record...sleepisawesome2

:roll: People dont like them simply because theyre not Infinity Ward.

Anyway, I dont see how Goldeneye was good. Keep in mind I wasnt a gamer then, I dont even know if I was born before it came out (1991) so I never played it untill last year and I thought it was horrible.

I'm going to have to disagree; look at Treyarch's other games.

treyarch has a good track record and matt is right,call of duty 3 is not as good as 4 but that dosent make it a bad game and call of duty 2 big red one is not as good as call of duty 2 but its still average and it dosent suck so what other games are you talking about?

http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?type=company&mode=13272

Treyarch haven't made a good game (not including CoD 3 which isn't their franchise) since 2002. I think there's enough proof it'll suck.

Avatar image for Co0kieMonsterxX
Co0kieMonsterxX

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Co0kieMonsterxX
Member since 2008 • 717 Posts
I used to play alot of nightfire on PS2 and Golden eye and Tomorrow Never Dies on N64...at least I think it was tomorrow never dies. I thought all those games were amazing when they were new. This new game looks pretty good from the screenshots. I might buy it when the price goes down a bit. Even if its not that good there is just something about james bond games that I like.
Avatar image for dangerd0g24
dangerd0g24

1455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 dangerd0g24
Member since 2008 • 1455 Posts
it will most likely be mediocre. not only that it is based off of a movie and all movie games turn out bad.