Rainbow 6 Vegas 1 or Vegas 2?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BlueCoopsy
BlueCoopsy

996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 BlueCoopsy
Member since 2008 • 996 Posts

I've played vegas 2 and its pretty good, but is it worth buying Vegas 1. Its only 15 dollars, so any thoughts?

Avatar image for mattg90520
mattg90520

3115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mattg90520
Member since 2006 • 3115 Posts
yeah, im curious. ive always thought about picking the game up. how hard are the achievements?
Avatar image for savetehhaloz
savetehhaloz

2373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#3 savetehhaloz
Member since 2007 • 2373 Posts
I thoroughly enjoyed RB6 Vegas and it was my summer game of 2007. I suggest you pick it up :)
Avatar image for t0taldj
t0taldj

1397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 t0taldj
Member since 2009 • 1397 Posts

Vegas 1 = alot more tactical shooting...

Vegas 2 = some running and gunning... and less tactical shooting

As a big big fan of Vegas 1. I was disappoined with Vegas 2. I played vegas 1 for 10 months and played vegas 2 for roughly 10 days. Plus vegas 1 has 4 player co-op, and better mp maps.

But that's all my opinion.

Avatar image for rustedMECH
rustedMECH

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 rustedMECH
Member since 2006 • 910 Posts

I enjoyed both single and multiplayer modes more in RSV2 than RSV.

Avatar image for Darkslayer16
Darkslayer16

3619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Darkslayer16
Member since 2006 • 3619 Posts

Vegas 1 = alot more tactical shooting...

Vegas 2 = some running and gunning... and less tactical shooting

As a big big fan of Vegas 1. I was disappoined with Vegas 2. I played vegas 1 for 10 months and played vegas 2 for roughly 10 days. Plus vegas 1 has 4 player co-op, and better mp maps.

But that's all my opinion.

t0taldj


Vegas 1 and 2 are almost exactly the same only 2 has a sprint button and ranks work a little different. Actual gameplay is almost identical.

Avatar image for Kill_ZONE2
Kill_ZONE2

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 Kill_ZONE2
Member since 2006 • 863 Posts
If you've played vegas 2, you've essentially played vegas 1 Besides, if you want to play multiplayer there is definately more players on vegas 2.
Avatar image for t0taldj
t0taldj

1397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 t0taldj
Member since 2009 • 1397 Posts

[QUOTE="t0taldj"]

Vegas 1 = alot more tactical shooting...

Vegas 2 = some running and gunning... and less tactical shooting

As a big big fan of Vegas 1. I was disappoined with Vegas 2. I played vegas 1 for 10 months and played vegas 2 for roughly 10 days. Plus vegas 1 has 4 player co-op, and better mp maps.

But that's all my opinion.

Darkslayer16


Vegas 1 and 2 are almost exactly the same only 2 has a sprint button and ranks work a little different. Actual gameplay is almost identical.

Nop... the overpowered shotguns... The sprint ability, and a small change in the cover and aim makes it really really different for vegas 1 pros.

Avatar image for Darkslayer16
Darkslayer16

3619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Darkslayer16
Member since 2006 • 3619 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkslayer16"]

[QUOTE="t0taldj"]

Vegas 1 = alot more tactical shooting...

Vegas 2 = some running and gunning... and less tactical shooting

As a big big fan of Vegas 1. I was disappoined with Vegas 2. I played vegas 1 for 10 months and played vegas 2 for roughly 10 days. Plus vegas 1 has 4 player co-op, and better mp maps.

But that's all my opinion.

t0taldj


Vegas 1 and 2 are almost exactly the same only 2 has a sprint button and ranks work a little different. Actual gameplay is almost identical.

Nop... the overpowered shotguns... The sprint ability, and a small change in the cover and aim makes it really really different for vegas 1 pros.


Umm... the shotgun was always over powered.. in Vegas 1 you can basically snipe with the shotguns.

Avatar image for axeman87
axeman87

999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#10 axeman87
Member since 2006 • 999 Posts

All I remember, was first playing RSV1 when it came out and thought it was pretty ordinary.

Yet, when I played RSV2 I loved it, I cant remember exactly why, but it just seemed to be a much better game. I think it looks a lot better, RSV1 had this horrible frosted look to it that I coudlnt stand. They must have worked out a bunch of minor bugs in it also because it it just worked better.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

Havn't played Vegas 1 but Vegas 2 was horrible. From what I hear the former is better.

Avatar image for CardiacKid07
CardiacKid07

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 CardiacKid07
Member since 2007 • 1225 Posts

I enjoyed both single and multiplayer modes more in RSV2 than RSV.

rustedMECH
Same here.
Avatar image for enterawesome
enterawesome

9477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 enterawesome
Member since 2009 • 9477 Posts
Vegas 2 is really good, the only flaw is that its not really "Vegas" anymore, just generic setpeices in the city. I like it better than 1 anyways.
Avatar image for Duke_51
Duke_51

806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Duke_51
Member since 2008 • 806 Posts

If you took gameplay from vegas 2 and combined it with the maps from vegas 1, you'd have the perfect vegas. Fortunately, there are a few original maps from vegas 1 that are available on vegas 2.