Masses agree ... Vegas is a better game ... i personally dont like Bad Company, It just doesnt FEEL right ... shooting in vegas is alot more accurate and it feels more real ... and also Bad Company is a newer game so they'll prbably give u more money for it
I have both and they are both great but i think i might sell bad company i do enjoy hte tactical part or vegas and it seems like it will take it longer for me to rank up in vegas so it will last longer
I would keep Rainbow Six Vegas 2. The campaign is fun... Multiplayer is better in my opinion. With the t-hunt missions - that adds tons of extra gamplay as well.
Those are my two favorite online shooters on the 360 at the moment! Vegas 2 is awesome and so is battlefield! Although both games take awhile to get use to.
I have RSV2, it's fun, but it's get boring after a while cause everyone loves to camp. I'm only an Elite though. But I played the BF:BC demo, and I really enjoyed it once I got the hang of sniping :)
I just bought bad company and Vegas 2 in the month span but i was thinking of selling one. But if i do sell one which one should it be and why?Navy0820
They are both great games, for me its Bad Company, but if you want Co op then i would say Vegas.. i love BF's online and the destructible walls and everything really changes up the game. and with vegas you get to pick what guns you get and everything.. so like i said its up to you they are both great games... keep them both
I own both, but I would have to say Vegas. BF can just be frustrating sometimes on the smaller maps. You will spawn with 65 percent health because you are being shot at as soon as you spawn.
write now that i am seeing everyones opinon i might keep both and the next game i but wll be mercanaries 2 but feel free to keep writing all your opinons
Considering that BBC is a rip-off of COD4 wich copied Rainbow Six Vegas, keep RSV2.great_rulo
Yeah, um, how do you figure any of that? Call of Duty is not a squad based tactical shooter, and Battlefield is a completely different experience from CoD4; different guns, destructible environments, much larger maps, vehicle combat, no perks or weapon customization, and CoD has nothing like Gold Rush... what, is it the fact that they both have Middle Eastern set maps? Explain your reasoning here.
Log in to comment