rainbow six vegas series = rentals at best

  • 80 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts
who here thinks that the rainbow six vegas series is only good enough for a rental, i mean common, the production values suck, the game seems like just another shooter, the game just isnt as high quality as cod, unreal, halo, mario, zelda...plus tom clancy likes to whore out games, seeing theres a tom clancy game on the market, almost every year or so...all tom clancy games suck...ok not suck, but they are rentals are best
Avatar image for DZBricktop
DZBricktop

2914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DZBricktop
Member since 2007 • 2914 Posts
I dont agree.
Avatar image for Strife88
Strife88

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 Strife88
Member since 2005 • 6073 Posts
I disagree with everything you just said. Most/All Tom clancy games are innovators and it shows in how much they offer in their gameplay. I can hardly remember any game before GRAW that allowed you to use cover and tactics as well as they did and the same with RSV. Just that alone and the styles of these games make them guarenteed buys.
Avatar image for Strife88
Strife88

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 Strife88
Member since 2005 • 6073 Posts
I considered RSV a huge waste of my $60. I felt I flushed my cash down the toilet after a few days of playing both the SP and MP. I won't even be giving RSV2 a rent. It looks like a quick cash-in off the first games success. No thank you. There are 5 other games I'd rather be playing in March.BioShockOwnz

I take it you're not that good at FPS and were just overwhelmed by it. RSV2 may seem like a quick cash-in to you, but there's enough new content in it to make it a true sequel.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#7 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts
I dissagree, I still enjoy alot of Tom Clancy games..... Vegas was alot of fun online, but i must admit i had a bit mroe fun with the first Rainbow6 and Rainbow6 Black Arrow. Ill still be getting Vegas2 though, because i played the first Vegas alot online with friends.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#8 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
couldnt disagree more, i cant wait for RSV2
Avatar image for bazanger
bazanger

2838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 bazanger
Member since 2004 • 2838 Posts
i really have no idea what the hell you're talking about. not only did rainbow six vegas provide a great single player story, but it also gave me one of the best multiplayer FPS games i've ever played. R6V2 looks only to better the first.
Avatar image for nyc05
nyc05

10190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 nyc05
Member since 2005 • 10190 Posts

I couldn't possibly disagree with you more.

I loved both the single player and the multipalyer in Rainbow Six, and I can't wait for Rainbow Six 2.

Avatar image for jpstill85
jpstill85

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 jpstill85
Member since 2006 • 440 Posts
Go play your Halo some more and cry to their garbage community cause you get your world rocked in some Rainbow Six.
Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts
rainbox six vegas just feels like a poor mans cod4..i mean why have margarine when you can have butter.....it just feels cheap, and whored out...thats why i said its only a rental.....i mean common, look at all the AAA games that have been out since vegas 1...halo 3, cod4, bioshock, mass effect, super mario galaxy, metroid prime 3, gears, i can go on...rainboz six is just average...also if gears 2 comes out this year itll own vegas 2....also we have fay cry 2, fallout 3, possibly re5 and sf4, common do you guys actually think vegas has a chance?...my foot it does?....pffff you guys are delusional
Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts

Go play your Halo some more and cry to their garbage community cause you get your world rocked in some Rainbow Six.jpstill85

rainbow six vegas is an easier game online than halo 3 or cod4...so why dont u go cry, cos apparently you like doing so

Avatar image for bazanger
bazanger

2838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 bazanger
Member since 2004 • 2838 Posts
rainbox six vegas just feels like a poor mans cod4..i mean why have margarine when you can have butter.....it just feels cheap, and whored out...thats why i said its only a rental.....i mean common, look at all the AAA games that have been out since vegas 1...halo 3, cod4, bioshock, mass effect, super mario galaxy, metroid prime 3, gears, i can go on...rainboz six is just average...also if gears 2 comes out this year itll own vegas 2....also we have fay cry 2, fallout 3, possibly re5 and sf4, common do you guys actually think vegas has a chance?...my foot it does?....pffff you guys are delusionalIronre5
you're the delusional one. gears came out first, SMG and metriod prime 3 aren't on the 360, fay cry isn't real, i have no idea what SF4 is, and bioshock, mass effect, fallout, and resident evil are completely different types of games. i mean, i understand the fact that you're a CoD4 fanboy, but Vegas is a fantastic game and i feel bad for you because either 1. you just suck at it, 2. my joke was correct and you really are a fanboy, 3. you can't recognize a good game when you see it., or 4. vegas was simply too good.
Avatar image for jpstill85
jpstill85

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 jpstill85
Member since 2006 • 440 Posts

[QUOTE="jpstill85"]Go play your Halo some more and cry to their garbage community cause you get your world rocked in some Rainbow Six.Ironre5

rainbow six vegas is an easier game online than halo 3 or cod4...so why dont u go cry, cos apparently you like doing so

Actually, I'm pretty dominant at CoD4 and was at Halo3 until I sold it cause it was boring. Rainbow Six Vegas was definitely the greatest challenge of any of them from my experience. And in no way shape or form was I crying... so I believe you should check yourself before you make a comment like that because you're just embarassing yourself.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

I respect your opinion, but I could not disagree any more. RSV is my favorite 360 game of all time (hence my profile pic). The multiplayer is extremely varied and deep, and the community is way more mature than Halo3 or even CoD4. You can't go into RSV and treat it like any other shooter or you will get your @$$ handed to you. RS is a thinking man's shooter; it actually requires you to work as a team and move tactically in order to win. That's what I love most about RS, and I am waiting with great anticipation for RSV2.

If you asked me which game I wish I had rented instead of bought, I would have to say Halo 3 for sure. At least RS adds something new and exciting to the multiplayer with each installment instead of reshashing the same formula with brighter lights and bloom.

Avatar image for KMay23
KMay23

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 KMay23
Member since 2007 • 65 Posts

OK. Here is my opinion on this subject. I think CoD4 took a lot of ideas from Rainbow Six Vegas (ranking system for one). Plus if you think the ranking system in CoD 4 is good wait til' you play the Rainbow Six series. MANY MANY rewards as you level higher and higher. I think CoD 4 is a great game but will definitely be trumped by Rainbow Six Vegas 2. I have no doubt in my mind. I wouldn't be suprised if it turns out to be the one of the best shooters on the 360 this year.

Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts
who here thinks that the rainbow six vegas series is only good enough for a rental, i mean common, the production values suck, the game seems like just another shooter, the game just isnt as high quality as cod, unreal, halo, mario, zelda...plus tom clancy likes to whore out games, seeing theres a tom clancy game on the market, almost every year or so...all tom clancy games suck...ok not suck, but they are rentals are bestIronre5
I think you need to stop eating the lead based paint...Vegas 1 is awsome & Vegas 2 might be the best game this year.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
I'll be blunt and quick here. You're the first person I've come across that dislikes/hates R6V series.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde

12935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 82

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
Member since 2005 • 12935 Posts

TC=a rental at best.

You obviously havent played R6V have you? Or you just hate great games......

Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts

I'll be blunt and quick here. You're the first person I've come across that dislikes/hates R6V series. Elann2008

i dont hate R6V..i think its a great game, its just nothing special, its not going to be remembered few years from now, like halo 1, or super mario bros. its just not classic, also maybe if they took out tom clancys name from the game, it wud be a whole lot better, that guy plain sucks....and GRAW sucked too...tom clancy games maybe good, even great, but theyre not classic, and nothing that i would spend 60 bucks on...there are far better games IMO coming out/already out, that deserve my 60 bucks......and unless you guys have tons of cash i dont see how youll can spend 60 bucks to buy a game like this...

Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts

[QUOTE="Ironre5"]rainbox six vegas just feels like a poor mans cod4..i mean why have margarine when you can have butter.....it just feels cheap, and whored out...thats why i said its only a rental.....i mean common, look at all the AAA games that have been out since vegas 1...halo 3, cod4, bioshock, mass effect, super mario galaxy, metroid prime 3, gears, i can go on...rainboz six is just average...also if gears 2 comes out this year itll own vegas 2....also we have fay cry 2, fallout 3, possibly re5 and sf4, common do you guys actually think vegas has a chance?...my foot it does?....pffff you guys are delusionalctfvyrsgurbnorn
you're the delusional one. gears came out first, SMG and metriod prime 3 aren't on the 360, fay cry isn't real, i have no idea what SF4 is, and bioshock, mass effect, fallout, and resident evil are completely different types of games. i mean, i understand the fact that you're a CoD4 fanboy, but Vegas is a fantastic game and i feel bad for you because either 1. you just suck at it, 2. my joke was correct and you really are a fanboy, 3. you can't recognize a good game when you see it., or 4. vegas was simply too good.

i listed Gears, cos it came out around the same time...i listed smg and metroid cos i was just citing how much better those games are in overall value, and amazingness than r6v...and i listed far cry cos its an excellent game, since when do games have to be real, to be great....dont be foolish, so in your opinion halo 1 isnt great, mario zelda metroid gears half life....SF4 = street fighter 4.....the reason i listed bioshock etc, is cos those are games that deserve 60 bucks...and those are the games that i will get over r6v anyday...i didnt add a whole lot of other game slike fable 2, ninja gaiden 2 etc, cos the list is too long....i dont suck at vegas, im not a fanboy, and obviosly from the games listed above you can see that i can recognize a good game when i see it, and NO vegas is no simply too good....its simply too average

Avatar image for Strife88
Strife88

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#24 Strife88
Member since 2005 • 6073 Posts
i dont hate R6V..i think its a great game, its just nothing special, its not going to be remembered few years from now, like halo 1, or super mario bros. its just not ****c, also maybe if they took out tom clancys name from the game, it wud be a whole lot better, that guy plain sucks....and GRAW sucked too...tom clancy games maybe good, even great, but theyre not ****c, and nothing that i would spend 60 bucks on...there are far better games IMO coming out/already out, that deserve my 60 bucks......and unless you guys have tons of cash i dont see how youll can spend 60 bucks to buy a game like this...Ironre5

Your opinions a little scattered now. Rainbow six vegas reinvented the series, it revived it and introduced a lot of gamers to the RS styl of gaming. It offered a lot of new tactics and an amazing online. Two years from an expert team (ubisoft montreal) can only mean amazing changes since the game engine is similar, their talents were focused on different elements of the gameplay. To not be able to pay the $60 for this game you're truly missing out on something great and everyone here would agree.
Avatar image for Vambran
Vambran

1921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Vambran
Member since 2005 • 1921 Posts
The game is okay but Tom Clancy puts his name on atleast 2 games a year and its starting to become over kill. Too much of a good thing can be bad.
Avatar image for ConflictMaster
ConflictMaster

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ConflictMaster
Member since 2008 • 212 Posts

rainbox six vegas just feels like a poor mans cod4..i mean why have margarine when you can have butter.....it just feels cheap, and whored out...thats why i said its only a rental.....i mean common, look at all the AAA games that have been out since vegas 1...halo 3, cod4, bioshock, mass effect, super mario galaxy, metroid prime 3, gears, i can go on...rainboz six is just average...also if gears 2 comes out this year itll own vegas 2....also we have fay cry 2, fallout 3, possibly re5 and sf4, common do you guys actually think vegas has a chance?...my foot it does?....pffff you guys are delusionalIronre5

RB6 is a AAA game,How is it a poor mans COD4,their not really as alike as you make it sound,RB6 is more of a tactical,close quarters game

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#27 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I'll be blunt and quick here. You're the first person I've come across that dislikes/hates R6V series. Ironre5

i dont hate R6V..i think its a great game, its just nothing special, its not going to be remembered few years from now, like halo 1, or super mario bros. its just not classic, also maybe if they took out tom clancys name from the game, it wud be a whole lot better, that guy plain sucks....and GRAW sucked too...tom clancy games maybe good, even great, but theyre not classic, and nothing that i would spend 60 bucks on...there are far better games IMO coming out/already out, that deserve my 60 bucks......and unless you guys have tons of cash i dont see how youll can spend 60 bucks to buy a game like this...

Sorry for putting words into your mouth like that. But you are right on one thing, maybe taking out his name (Tom Clancy) might be good for his games. I am, pretty tired of seeing Tom Clancy on everything lol. Although he makes great games. :)

We know you're good Tom!

Avatar image for angryfodder
angryfodder

20490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 angryfodder
Member since 2007 • 20490 Posts

Rainbow is probably the best shooter online. I rate it over the GRAW games.

COD4 is awesome, its a shollow, fast paced, run and gun shooter - and thats why I love it.

However, rainbow has more sticking power as I like the tactical, team work, communication bases gameplay

Avatar image for omrikk87
omrikk87

1322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 omrikk87
Member since 2005 • 1322 Posts
overall i would agree but.. the co-op online is awesome plus the co-op offline is just great alot of fun.. but i agree that a weekend could be enough to get the best out of the game...
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

I dont agree. DZBricktop

agreed. doubt he played it

Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts
[QUOTE="Ironre5"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I'll be blunt and quick here. You're the first person I've come across that dislikes/hates R6V series. Elann2008

i dont hate R6V..i think its a great game, its just nothing special, its not going to be remembered few years from now, like halo 1, or super mario bros. its just not classic, also maybe if they took out tom clancys name from the game, it wud be a whole lot better, that guy plain sucks....and GRAW sucked too...tom clancy games maybe good, even great, but theyre not classic, and nothing that i would spend 60 bucks on...there are far better games IMO coming out/already out, that deserve my 60 bucks......and unless you guys have tons of cash i dont see how youll can spend 60 bucks to buy a game like this...

Sorry for putting words into your mouth like that. But you are right on one thing, maybe taking out his name (Tom Clancy) might be good for his games. I am, pretty tired of seeing Tom Clancy on everything lol. Although he makes great games. :)

We know you're good Tom!

I don`t care if they call it Beavis and Butthead`s Rainbo 6, it`s gonna kick ass and thats ALL that matters!
Avatar image for pinionxl
pinionxl

1870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 pinionxl
Member since 2002 • 1870 Posts
I'll be blunt and quick here. You're the first person I've come across that dislikes/hates R6V series. Elann2008
I'm the second then I suppose. Most overrated FPS ever. I always try to like it and just hate it in every way. Same with Splinter Cell.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#33 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="Ironre5"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I'll be blunt and quick here. You're the first person I've come across that dislikes/hates R6V series. HilbillyRokstar

i dont hate R6V..i think its a great game, its just nothing special, its not going to be remembered few years from now, like halo 1, or super mario bros. its just not classic, also maybe if they took out tom clancys name from the game, it wud be a whole lot better, that guy plain sucks....and GRAW sucked too...tom clancy games maybe good, even great, but theyre not classic, and nothing that i would spend 60 bucks on...there are far better games IMO coming out/already out, that deserve my 60 bucks......and unless you guys have tons of cash i dont see how youll can spend 60 bucks to buy a game like this...

Sorry for putting words into your mouth like that. But you are right on one thing, maybe taking out his name (Tom Clancy) might be good for his games. I am, pretty tired of seeing Tom Clancy on everything lol. Although he makes great games. :)

We know you're good Tom!

I don`t care if they call it Beavis and Butthead`s Rainbo 6, it`s gonna kick ass and thats ALL that matters!

Lol.

Avatar image for spencertaylor
spencertaylor

288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 spencertaylor
Member since 2005 • 288 Posts
vegas is good but the single player on realistic was one of the most cheaply frustrating experiences in a game i've ever had. that and the first time i played doa4. overall its pretty good though, i just hope in the second one they fixed the godly enemy artificial intelligience.
Avatar image for jpstill85
jpstill85

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 jpstill85
Member since 2006 • 440 Posts

vegas is good but the single player on realistic was one of the most cheaply frustrating experiences in a game i've ever had. that and the first time i played doa4. overall its pretty good though, i just hope in the second one they fixed the godly enemy artificial intelligience.spencertaylor

I thought it was actually pretty well done. It was rough yes, but it wasn't anything unrealistic. I mean, look at the situations you faced and tell me how easy that would be in real life. I didn't really see anything "cheap" about it.

Avatar image for the_kidisblack
the_kidisblack

1184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 the_kidisblack
Member since 2008 • 1184 Posts

Who is this mighty noob called Ironre5

Just because you cant afford it

*o0o0o0o0o*

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts

I don't buy a lot of games, and I'm buying RSV2.

That game is going to last be so long if its anything like the first RSV.

Avatar image for Acronomic
Acronomic

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Acronomic
Member since 2003 • 439 Posts

Ironre5, looks like you're vastly outnumbered. Maybe you should just accept the fact that you simply don't like Rainbow Six and stop trying to convince everyone else to think the same thing.

Fact is that Raibow Six Vegas is a tactical shooter, while COD4 is simply a shooter. That means running arond shooting people, and the only thing that really matters is how fast you can react. Rainbow Six encourages a tactical way of thinking, and teamwork in multiplayer is essential, unlike in COD.

Call of Duty 4 is a glorified and quite boring shooter that unfortunately glues everyone to the screen, and I'm sorry for you if you can't see that. I played it for a week straight before I got my head together and realised I wasn't even having fun.

Avatar image for stolz1975
stolz1975

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 stolz1975
Member since 2005 • 422 Posts
your insane rb6 is the best the 360 has to offer as far as multi player games
Avatar image for fenwickhotmail
fenwickhotmail

7308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 fenwickhotmail
Member since 2004 • 7308 Posts
I agree in some ways. Thee latest one looks very similar to its predecessor so I will probably end up renting it
Avatar image for WMDfreeman99
WMDfreeman99

1874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 WMDfreeman99
Member since 2007 • 1874 Posts

I think that COD4 is a great game also Halo3. I cant stop playing either. There has always been a game that i go back to after awhile and that has always been the rainbow six series...Vegas i feel was one of the best FPS ever created. Now with the 2nd coming just make competitive online game even better..I feel sorry for the TC cause you are unable to enjoy some of the best gaming experience ever created.

Good luck in your future gaming!!!!

Avatar image for Nocturnal15
Nocturnal15

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Nocturnal15
Member since 2006 • 1476 Posts

who here thinks that the rainbow six vegas series is only good enough for a rental, i mean common, the production values suck, the game seems like just another shooter, the game just isnt as high quality as cod, unreal, halo, mario, zelda...plus tom clancy likes to whore out games, seeing theres a tom clancy game on the market, almost every year or so...all tom clancy games suck...ok not suck, but they are rentals are bestIronre5

If anything there are alot of things to fix in Vegas and it seems as if they are fixing it as well as adding Tons more. COD4 is good but not the greatest. They have yet to fix the shoddy hit detection. And where on earth did friggin Mario and Zelda come into this? Arent we comparing shooters here much less XBOX GAMES? No one here really cares about Nintendo.

Avatar image for Elraptor
Elraptor

30966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Elraptor
Member since 2004 • 30966 Posts
Calm down, people. Tastes vary. I've enjoyed playing R6V. Personally, I've never played a game with such a handy cover mechanic before, and the squad commands were remarkably smooth, too.
Avatar image for wellbigd
wellbigd

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 wellbigd
Member since 2007 • 240 Posts

RSV6 is a great game but can be frustrating in difficulty. It was to me maybe because this was the first FPS I played but It got me really frustrated and the MP had bad graphics it looked like gta.personal I would rent the next one just cause of the difficulty.

Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts

Who is this mighty noob called Ironre5

Just because you cant afford it

*o0o0o0o0o*

the_kidisblack

i can afford it, i just dont think that i would like to put down 60 bucks for a turd of a game....on the other hand you like turdy games, so i can imagine you even selling your mother to be able to play the game....

Avatar image for WMDfreeman99
WMDfreeman99

1874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 WMDfreeman99
Member since 2007 • 1874 Posts
[QUOTE="the_kidisblack"]

Who is this mighty noob called Ironre5

Just because you cant afford it

*o0o0o0o0o*

Ironre5

i can afford it, i just dont think that i would like to put down 60 bucks for a turd of a game....on the other hand you like turdy games, so i can imagine you even selling your mother to be able to play the game....

.

relax man its just a game. grow up

Avatar image for cheames748
cheames748

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 cheames748
Member since 2007 • 667 Posts
I don't like R6V, but the reasons you gave sucked. I don't think there's anything wrong with the game, its just not my cup of tea.
Avatar image for Ironre5
Ironre5

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Ironre5
Member since 2008 • 1164 Posts
[QUOTE="Ironre5"][QUOTE="the_kidisblack"]

Who is this mighty noob called Ironre5

Just because you cant afford it

*o0o0o0o0o*

WMDfreeman99

i can afford it, i just dont think that i would like to put down 60 bucks for a turd of a game....on the other hand you like turdy games, so i can imagine you even selling your mother to be able to play the game....

.

relax man its just a game. grow up

he started it lol...

Avatar image for Sub-ZeroJoe
Sub-ZeroJoe

377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Sub-ZeroJoe
Member since 2007 • 377 Posts

[QUOTE="jpstill85"]Go play your Halo some more and cry to their garbage community cause you get your world rocked in some Rainbow Six.Ironre5

rainbow six vegas is an easier game online than halo 3 or cod4...so why dont u go cry, cos apparently you like doing so

It definetly isnt. CoD4 is probably one of the easiest games to pick up and be good at. Not much skill is needed to dominate in a online match.