Rainbow Six: Vegas VS Call Of Duty 4

Which is the better game? I like Vegas much more because it feels much more tactical than CoD4. Vegas is all about planning things out. CoD4 is about who sees who first.

CoD4 actually feels very much like a rip-off of both Battlefield and R6:V (multiplayer wise).

I suck at tactical shooters.

COD was my thing.

Which is the better game? I like Vegas much more because it feels much more tactical than CoD4. Vegas is all about planning things out. CoD4 is about who sees who first.

CoD4 actually feels very much like a rip-off of both Battlefield and R6:V (multiplayer wise).

Uncle_Uzi

Vegas is a more tactical game.

CoD4 has the same CoD feel as always so it is in no way a rip off of another game. The only thing that really changed about the series was the time period it was based on. Its the same CoD feel it has always had.

Who wins is all up to opinion really. Some people rather have a less tactical game others rather have that tactical game. IMO CoD can be played either way. It seems to me the people who play it with tactics in mind always get the better scores.

I'm probably getting more fun out of Call of Duty 4 than I have for any game on the 360, multiplayer wise. I just like style of gameplay on CoD 4.

i love both but i sucked at vegas

so i switched over to cod

COD4 multilpayer is alot like rainbow six but COD4 pulls it off alot better.

I like both and I have both.

COD4 is good to jump in and just play.

Rainbow Six: Is more of a Clan game and the level ofthings you can do is insane.

Also Vegas is a year old. Vegas 2 will be with the Unreal Ed 3.0 (Gears of War)

But for the win, I pick Rainbow Six.

Vegas runs circles around COD4...nuff said.

Both are incredible games IMO, though they are very different:

VEGAS:

RSV is a much slower paced shooter. It takes a lot more thought and planning to win a RS match. You have less chance of killing someone with the "spray and pray" technique than in CoD4. Also, the cover system alone completely differentiates the two games. I find myself communicating with my team WAY more in RS than in CoD, because that's what it takes to win. I also move a lot slower through the levels being way more cautious and I tend to camp more in RS.

CoD4:

Call of Duty is much more run and gun. Whereas my style in Rainbow Six is to hang back or move very slowly, CoD4 for me is all about constant and quick flanking maneuvers. I am almost constantly sprinting to get behind the other team or skirting the outside of the map. I am very run-and-gun in CoD, usually to great success (2.25 k/d ratio, over 4000 kills so far). I also tend to operate much more independently in CoD4 when in RS I relied more on my team and communication.

In conclusion, they are just very different games. I love that both share a similar health system and that it is very easy to take someone down with a few well placed shots, but it's hard to say that one is better than the other. Your play style should really determine which game you choose.

Rainbow Six Vegas by far for me.

I love how tactical and team based it is, and something that brings down COD4 is that I never need my teammates. I always play individualy, and never need help because of how easy it is just to die and forget about it. In RSV, if I die, I know that I need to tell my teammates that I did and where the enemy is coming from while in COD4, I never hear anyone calling out any enemies.

I'll go even as far as saying that Halo is more tactical than COD games.

I'll go even as far as saying that Halo is more tactical than COD games.

II-FBIsniper-II

Blasphemy!