Yay or Nay?
i for one think that halo is a legend in games and should continue to live on like mario. making stand alone games like reach is good enough. thoughts?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yay or Nay?
i for one think that halo is a legend in games and should continue to live on like mario. making stand alone games like reach is good enough. thoughts?
I think it should continue, but maybe with a couple of new trilogies. I don't want it lasting as long as Mario though, as I think Halo's already got a bit boring. But the fluid combat and AI are really awesome, and I would say more things like Halo 3: ODST (with you not as Master Chief and two discs) would be great.
I might not get Halo Reach if it doesn't have Firefight, which was basically my reason for buying ODST as it greatly extends the lifespan of the game.
The only new Halo game i would like to see after Reach and before you say it I know it wont happen is a complete remake of Halo 3.
After that im not sure, if Bungie say what they are going to do with Reach and that is " max out the 360 " and I hope they are right there might be room for more but maybe not for a little while.
No, but I think they need to take a break after Reach. Maybe wait until the Xbox 3 to release another Halo. Work on making an epic campaign and adding to the multiplayer without changing the balance. And make an entirely new engine. Just, do whatever it takes to not release another halo this gen.
I might not get Halo Reach if it doesn't have Firefight, which was basically my reason for buying ODST as it greatly extends the lifespan of the game.
chelseaman99
Doesn't competitive multiplayer do that to?
They will milk the series for as much as they can, Though As someone who enjoys story I am curious as to how this will turn out. yes we know the outcome..but how they fought is always nice to see. And who knows what kind of toys they never got off the planet for us to use :)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment