single player campaigns a must

k certain titles that been released lately just don't focus on whats really important!SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN.i MEAN GUYS i BEAT COD4 in 5 hours!!!!!!!!! FIVE HOURS!!!!.and i got store cred for it the next day,I mean why even bother making a game with a campaign that short.whats the point?whats the point in making a game with 6 stages,(ARMY OF TWO)WHICH i WILL BE TRADING IN FOR dark sector tomorrow.But my point is games of today, this generation focus two topics a bit too much,eye candy(graphics)&multiplayer(onlinemultiplayer)now nothing is wrong with a good multiplayer BUT in each title that has it its almost the same, a king of the hill,a capture the flag(not always those words)& a death match.in each game its the same thing just a different concept of it.Now eye candy,I love a game that's good on the eyes but after a while the graphics will wear thin.I just think they should take the extra time,push a game back for another year.work on something that will make someone say o.k!!!I'll spend $64 on this.because lately it's been pretty DISAPPOINTING.search your hearts guyz&galz you know I'm right.

Call of Duty 4 is not as short as people say. You beat it in 5 hours because you played it on easy.

How about you play the game on Veteran like a REAL gamer?

I can beat any game in 5 hours if I play it on the easy setting, but I don't do that. Only losers play games on anything less than the hardest setting.

I also agree though that about most games campaigns being to short. Army of two is a prime example because all the reviewers and player reviews were saying that the campaign is the best part about army of two. So why make the campaign so short? idk.

ya i agree games are getting shorter, but really i think our expecations are getting much higher

army of 2 has a short campaign, but its a co op game and you can play those levels over and over again

i know i do and its still fun with my buddy