STOP complaining about WWII shooters!!!!!

"I hate wwii shooters they're all the same." "I can't believe another wwii shooter is coming out." Stop saying they are all the same because THEY'RE NOT. Go complain about how the Madden sports games are all the same. Football, NCAA, Nascar, Hockey, Soccer...THEY'RE ALL THE SAME. Not WWII shooters.

WWII is awesome. i think they should make more, thank god for COD: world at war.**** modern day warfare it can suck my wizard ballsRJB1994

Make more? There are hundreds of them.

The WW2 thing is played out and has been done to death. I'm sick of them and I know for a fact that most people our also sick of them as well. PlasmaBeam44

yeah. especially with the D-Day part. its too overwhelmed.

NEVER!

But seriously, I could care less that there are more WWII shooters. You could complain that there is too much of any game really. "I'm so sick of puzzle games!" "I'm so sick of RPGs!" There are always going to be a lot of types of games in a genre, just deal with it!

"I'm so sick of RPGs!" There are always going to be a lot of types of games in a genre, just deal with it!

EkriLik

You really picked the wrong genre for and example. And i don't think i've ever heard someone say that about the 360's library.

You're comparing a WWII shooter to a sporting event? Its Football, Basketball, NASCAR, Hockey, Soccer. They don't change. Teams change. Owners change. Plays change. But the fundamental gameplay of any sport stays the same. WWII had many battles. Many countries. Many weapons. But WWII games keep rehashing the same battles, with the same countries, with the same weapons. And that's why people get tired of them. It's not the gameplay. A good game is a good game. And i wont ignore any game just because of the setting. But give me something new. If you do, and its a good game, they'll keep getting my money.

I don't mind them. Although i'd rather see different things. Like Turning point but actually good.craigalan23

I agree, Turning Point sounds great in concept it was just poorly executed. A better developer should really try to re-do that game or try something similar I think.

[QUOTE="EkriLik"]

"I'm so sick of RPGs!" There are always going to be a lot of types of games in a genre, just deal with it!

vendettared468

You really picked the wrong genre for and example. And i don't think i've ever heard someone say that about the 360's library.

I meant of all consoles, not just 360.

I will play any WWII game as long as it is fun and realistic. I could care less wether they keep making them but the only thing I wish they would do is have you doing things other than destroy AA guns and raiding a big house on the top of a hill surrounded by Nazis.

Like I want to storm the beaches of Normandy and have an experience almost like the DDay scene in Saving Private Ryan.

I don't care where or when it is (excluding the future) as long as it is fun, realistic, and has you do lots of things.

the tc is right

i love ww2

except the thing i dont like about the cod games is that they dont have skill levels that make unlimited waves of enemies coming at u so its like u can kill 100s of people but u will still lose if u dont move up

NEVER!

But seriously, I could care less that there are more WWII shooters. You could complain that there is too much of any game really. "I'm so sick of puzzle games!" "I'm so sick of RPGs!" There are always going to be a lot of types of games in a genre, just deal with it!

EkriLik

yeah...i agree with you on that

Why don't you stop complaining about the WWII videogame complainers?

There are too many FPSs on the 360. There are too many WWII FPSs. It was a novel idea 10 years ago; now it is a long dead horse whose tattered corpse is continually beaten by developers too eager to copy the idea and attempt to make a quick buck.

I'd much rather see the money and talent invested in an original title, or an under-represented genre, or just something new and different. Instead, we're shoveled more WWII titles and expected to fork over our money to support a tired genre in a tired setting.

Why can't developers do something a little different? I don't know - how about a third-person shooter set in Vietnam? It's not that far outside the box, but could be interesting. Not the same old tired crap we're getting instead.

Everyone is sick of them because we all know what happened in WWII. There's no surprises in the story at all. In Call of Duty 4, it was exiting because you DIDN'T know what was going to happen. That's why I'm sick of WWII shooters. (And everyone likes future/modern guns.)xRmRxfreakBOMB

Why don't you stop complaining about the WWII videogame complainers?

There are too many FPSs on the 360. There are too many WWII FPSs. It was a novel idea 10 years ago; now it is a long dead horse whose tattered corpse is continually beaten by developers too eager to copy the idea and attempt to make a quick buck.

I'd much rather see the money and talent invested in an original title, or an under-represented genre, or just something new and different. Instead, we're shoveled more WWII titles and expected to fork over our money to support a tired genre in a tired setting.

Why can't developers do something a little different? I don't know - how about a third-person shooter set in Vietnam? It's not that far outside the box, but could be interesting. Not the same old tired crap we're getting instead.

kennykaos317

[QUOTE="kennykaos317"]

Why don't you stop complaining about the WWII videogame complainers?

There are too many FPSs on the 360. There are too many WWII FPSs. It was a novel idea 10 years ago; now it is a long dead horse whose tattered corpse is continually beaten by developers too eager to copy the idea and attempt to make a quick buck.

I'd much rather see the money and talent invested in an original title, or an under-represented genre, or just something new and different. Instead, we're shoveled more WWII titles and expected to fork over our money to support a tired genre in a tired setting.

Why can't developers do something a little different? I don't know - how about a third-person shooter set in Vietnam? It's not that far outside the box, but could be interesting. Not the same old tired crap we're getting instead.

monkeytoes61

I don't think that's true. I don't expect game companies these days to invest a ton of money in a radically new genre. But at least try something a little different. Bioshock, Mass Effect, and Assassin's Creed are three good examples. All were new titles, not sequels. All brought something a little new and different to their genres. And all received both critical and commercial praise.

What has been announced for COD5 is a step backward. Why are we going back to WWII? The gameplay sounds like Treyarch will simply rehash the awesomeness that Infinity Ward created. They're going to have to give me a reason to stop playing COD4. I'm going to need more than COD4+1.

I wish they would stop making WWII shooters, I've killed i dunno, about 100000000000000000000000000090834734837 Nazis over the years, so you cant tell me that this genre is not getting old.masterchief375

and you're gonna say you've killed less say . . . aliens over the years? doubt it chief.

"I hate wwii shooters they're all the same." "I can't believe another wwii shooter is coming out." Stop saying they are all the same because THEY'RE NOT. Go complain about how the Madden sports games are all the same. Football, NCAA, Nascar, Hockey, Soccer...THEY'RE ALL THE SAME. Not WWII shooters.

SirCokerThe9th

We are compaining because we dont want a good game like Call of Duty 4, being as successful as it was, getting FUKED up by some random developer, making the game in the same setting and time as all the other 100 FPS WWII piece of crap games that came before it. Whats the point of making the same game, u cant change the story, only the gameplay but that can be very limited. How the hell will COD5 online be compared to COD4's online? Will we get some random attachments? COD4 took a risk and made a new story new setting and fun weapons. In the WWII games the story was predicatable but in Call of Duty 4 u didnt no what happened. I think that we all have the right to FUKING compain about these crappy WWII shooters and hopefully us whining and complaining will get through the stupid developers heads. WORLD WAR GAMES SUCK!! PERIOD!!

Mostly we constaintly buy Sports games because of the new physics and graphics, sometimes they add new gameplay elements but mostly we buy these game so when ppl come over we can play against eachother and have a good time.

Also u didnt even justify or explain why all WWII games are not the same....Same time period, same guns, SAME STORY, SAME GAME!

FAIL!!!

Why don't you stop complaining about the WWII videogame complainers?

There are too many FPSs on the 360. There are too many WWII FPSs. It was a novel idea 10 years ago; now it is a long dead horse whose tattered corpse is continually beaten by developers too eager to copy the idea and attempt to make a quick buck.

I'd much rather see the money and talent invested in an original title, or an under-represented genre, or just something new and different. Instead, we're shoveled more WWII titles and expected to fork over our money to support a tired genre in a tired setting.

Why can't developers do something a little different? I don't know - how about a third-person shooter set in Vietnam? It's not that far outside the box, but could be interesting. Not the same old tired crap we're getting instead.

kennykaos317

QFT.

"I hate wwii shooters they're all the same." "I can't believe another wwii shooter is coming out." Stop saying they are all the same because THEY'RE NOT. Go complain about how the Madden sports games are all the same. Football, NCAA, Nascar, Hockey, Soccer...THEY'RE ALL THE SAME. Not WWII shooters.

SirCokerThe9th

[QUOTE="kennykaos317"]

Why don't you stop complaining about the WWII videogame complainers?

There are too many FPSs on the 360. There are too many WWII FPSs. It was a novel idea 10 years ago; now it is a long dead horse whose tattered corpse is continually beaten by developers too eager to copy the idea and attempt to make a quick buck.

I'd much rather see the money and talent invested in an original title, or an under-represented genre, or just something new and different. Instead, we're shoveled more WWII titles and expected to fork over our money to support a tired genre in a tired setting.

Why can't developers do something a little different? I don't know - how about a third-person shooter set in Vietnam? It's not that far outside the box, but could be interesting. Not the same old tired crap we're getting instead.

WardCleaver02

QFT.

How are there too many WW2 shooters on the 360?

CoD2
CoD3
The Outfit
Hour of Victory
Turning Point

[QUOTE="WardCleaver02"][QUOTE="kennykaos317"]

Why don't you stop complaining about the WWII videogame complainers?

There are too many FPSs on the 360. There are too many WWII FPSs. It was a novel idea 10 years ago; now it is a long dead horse whose tattered corpse is continually beaten by developers too eager to copy the idea and attempt to make a quick buck.

I'd much rather see the money and talent invested in an original title, or an under-represented genre, or just something new and different. Instead, we're shoveled more WWII titles and expected to fork over our money to support a tired genre in a tired setting.

Why can't developers do something a little different? I don't know - how about a third-person shooter set in Vietnam? It's not that far outside the box, but could be interesting. Not the same old tired crap we're getting instead.

Juggernaut140

QFT.

How are there too many WW2 shooters on the 360?

CoD2
CoD3
The Outfit
Hour of Victory
Turning Point

That's 4 too many.

WW2 shooters is my favorite genera, and I am way excited for The new Call of duty World at war, It sounds F'ing intense and brutal.