Dragon Age: Origins. Definitely one of my top 10 favorite games of all time. Although I played on PC, I don't know if I'd feel the same if I'd played the 360 version.
I'd have to go with. Dragon Age: Origins. The Characters were good, and I felt immersed in a great world, loved the complexity, wasn't an RPG lite. I was hoping for much more from Fable III. Like more customisation and complexity, definitely didn't happen. That said I still really like Fable III.
I barely made it through Fable III, and I wasn't a fan of the ending. On Dragon Age, however, I beat the game three times, did every piece of DLC and got every achievement. I adore Dragon Age Origins, and on a different note hated Dragon Age II. I think I'd even take Fable III over Dragon Age II!
ive never played dragon age, but fable 3 was a disaster in my eyes.
bessy67
People are way too hard on Fable 3. Sure, it was too easy and the story wasn't great, but it was still fun. It was at least a 7.5-8.5 type game.
maybe i over exagerated, it is GOOD, but it was a big stepdown from fable 2. and honestly i didnt feel like i had a reason to play it, i mean there was nothing to keep me going at all.
Holy cow - what an excellent question! They were both such epic let-downs it's really hard to decide. But since Dragon Age really tried to be a good game and Fable 3 was pretty much a mockery of Fable 2, I'd have to give the nod to Dragon Age.
Fable 3 is better if you like a simpler RPG experience that still has a good story and combat mechanics. Dragon Age is better if your an RPG purist who enjoys depth.
KoA Reckoning beats both, and Skyrim/Fallout beats that. Couldn't get into DA:O and Fable III was an abomination even compared to the lackluster Fable II.
Log in to comment