Which game would you prefer for online purposes, and has a decent story. I like both the style of COD4 gameplay and GRAW. Which would you say is more fun and has more team work involved?
I'd recommend BF: BC much more over RSV2. RSV2 is a great game but the online issues are more than unacceptable. RSV2 also has next to no story that you'll actually care about while BF will have you turning up the volume just to hear the jokes and the story. And for once, you aren't a hero to save the day so it's interesting.
RSV2's gameplay is more like GRAW than CoD 4 while BF: BC is vice-versa. BF is much more fun (IMO) and it definetely requires much more teamwork which is a great addition. The destructable environments are great too.
I'd recommend BF: BC much more over RSV2. RSV2 is a great game but the online issues are more than unacceptable. RSV2 also has next to no story that you'll actually care about while BF will have you turning up the volume just to hear the jokes and the story. And for once, you aren't a hero to save the day so it's interesting.
RSV2's gameplay is more like GRAW than CoD 4 while BF: BC is vice-versa. BF is much more fun (IMO) and it definetely requires much more teamwork which is a great addition. The destructable environments are great too.
Vegas 2 is much better, me and a friend of mine bought it and played it at his place for about 4 hours and the game is not very good, we both returned our copies to ebgames and put money down on some other games. Get Vegas 2, its alot better then Vegas 1 and if you like realist shooters its perfect as far as online goes imo. If you have some friends to be on your team or justdecent random players who work as a tema, Vegas 2 is alot of fun, very team based for modes like teamconquest and team deathmatch.
Id rate Vegas 2 a 9 and the new battleifield a 7 at the most.
I just want to say I thought the first Rainbow Six game was the possibly the best online game for it's time and with the second I expected a lot more from it. It's still good, but next to Battlefield it's not the better game.
Battlefield: BC has an amazing and addictive multiplayer, campaign is hilarious. Vegas 2 is awesome but the game was a lot more popular back in Vegas 1. It's still a great game but I would go with Battlefield.
I just want to say I thought the first Rainbow Six game was the possibly the best online game for it's time and with the second I expected a lot more from it. It's still good, but next to Battlefield it's not the better game.Strife88
i played it for 2 hours and couldn't find anything to like about it.... I could shoot a guy 63 times with a SMG and he'd be fine; and while i reloaded he would come up close to me with a shotty and kill me. BF is much more balanced. RSV pretty much made you use either a sniper or shotgun to kill people --- otherwise it was next to impossible.
It's a tough call. Bad Company definitely requires more teamwork, but i don't necessarily consider that a good thing because you'll get pissed off when your team members don't pull their weight. Battlefield is much larger in scale and features vehicles. Vegas 2 is close combat and has a more solid "feel" to the gunfights and such. So I'd base your decision more on that. Close combat/cover system type tactical gameplay versus all out war.
btw I really liked the single player campaign in Vegas 2 and you can play it all co-op, so it may be worth it for that... haven't tried the SP for Bad Company yet.
oh and you will spend a LOT more time customizing your character and unlocking stuff in Vegas 2 :)
Log in to comment