Too Human - Online co-op down to 2 players!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for allnamestaken
allnamestaken

6618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 allnamestaken
Member since 2003 • 6618 Posts

10 years in dev and the best they can give us is 2 player co-op in a primarily online ARPG?! This is doubley bad because for months they've been promoting the four player co-op as a big thing! Goodbye Diablo killer.

http://toohuman.net/index.php?option=com_joomlaboard&Itemid=28&func=view&id=20139&catid=2

Avatar image for madgamer544
madgamer544

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 madgamer544
Member since 2008 • 42 Posts
thats pretty stupid, i was actually thinking about getting this just to be able to play with friends but now its kinda pointless
Avatar image for Mau-Justice
Mau-Justice

4907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Mau-Justice
Member since 2008 • 4907 Posts

10 years in dev and the best they can give us is 2 player co-op in a primarily online ARPG?! This is doubley bad because for months they've been promoting the four player co-op as a big thing! Goodbye Diablo killer.

http://toohuman.net/index.php?option=com_joomlaboard&Itemid=28&func=view&id=20139&catid=2

allnamestaken

4 Player coop would hardly be a Diablo killer anyway.

Trust me, they have something up their sleeve. Why would they even have the BioEngineer (Medic) for 2 player coop? I'm really stoked about this game, I don't even care if I have to play it 1 player...It's like Devil May Cry with tons of RPG elements.

So what will the benefit be from all of the Group Buffs they explained in the skill tree videos.

I will be trying it out no matter what.

Avatar image for djphelps
djphelps

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 djphelps
Member since 2002 • 331 Posts
yeah, i prefer the real-world co-op instead of the online co-op. That allows for some gaming time and spouse-time at the same time. We need more games like Baldur's Gate and Marvel Alliance, not less.
Avatar image for destinhpark
destinhpark

4831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 destinhpark
Member since 2006 • 4831 Posts
who cares? local co op is way better anyways.
Avatar image for Magebane
Magebane

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Magebane
Member since 2003 • 362 Posts

Not too excited about this news.

Reserving judgement til release ;(

Avatar image for Mau-Justice
Mau-Justice

4907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Mau-Justice
Member since 2008 • 4907 Posts

who cares? local co op is way better anyways. destinhpark

My thoughts exactly.

This will really make group buffs pretty pointless, who wants to play a healer in a 2 man group though? Seriously...

Avatar image for DoomBringer2010
DoomBringer2010

649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 DoomBringer2010
Member since 2006 • 649 Posts
they only took out 4 player co-op because they thought it would drag the gameplay down, besides 2 ppl are more than enough in co-op
Avatar image for Mau-Justice
Mau-Justice

4907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mau-Justice
Member since 2008 • 4907 Posts

they only took out 4 player co-op because they thought it would drag the gameplay down, besides 2 ppl are more than enough in co-opDoomBringer2010

Well they thought it would cause problems (Slowdown etc) having 4 beserkers zooming across the screen.

But it does kind of bring concern as to group buffs and stuff like that. Like I said, nobody will play a healer in a 2 man group, so all these group buffs they were planning may mess with balance and bring other issues. Considering they've already had a delay, I'm a little worried.

Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts
WOWOW they pulled it because of the way it looks what you have 4 people zooming around? WTF!? that has to be the biggest BS ever. this game was practically built around coop (the skills) and then they cut it in half... uhg! i dunno about this any more it just wont be the same with 2 people... (still might be a decent game but not has good as it would have been with 4 players; online will probably be dead after a couple months) EVEN action games like champions of norath on PS2 had 4 player coop and that was like one of the first online ps2 games. this pisses me off.
Avatar image for crosis420
crosis420

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 crosis420
Member since 2007 • 115 Posts
WOWOW they pulled it because of the way it looks what you have 4 people zooming around? WTF!? that has to be the biggest BS ever. this game was practically built around coop (the skills) and then they cut it in half... uhg! i dunno about this any more it just wont be the same with 2 people... (still might be a decent game but not has good as it would have been with 4 players; online will probably be dead after a couple months) EVEN action games like champions of norath on PS2 had 4 player coop and that was like one of the first online ps2 games. this pisses me off.zero9167
i agree w/u rember the critical hit bubble