Too Human's 5.5 (opinions plz)

Plz no opinions from peple who have not played the game at all, or barley gave the demo a shot. I personally feel that this was rather low cuz I quite like it. IT reminds me of Diablo a bit and it's fun to customize your character from the ground up. A few cool touches are when you click the right analog stick it does a panaramic view of your character so you can see all the cool stuff you've equipped him with. I don't know, maybe I'm crazy but I think they did a fine job and the camera's not as bad as they say once you realize the game is linear and you don't have to look around and it gives you very scenic cam shots alot.....I"m curious what you guys think about it, do you think the game is that bad? Or are you liking it?

gamespot completely demolished this game in its review.

I persoanlly didnt like it its not my cup of tea. but i really dont see why it got such low scores my friend plays it and loves it.

dont let reviews change your opinion man.

I'd recommend Too Human if you dig dungeon crawler hack n' slash games with a lot of loot. I wouldn't recommend to others, though. They'll think it's far too repetitive, because their not used to these kinda games. Anyways, it's a quality product, but it does have some rough edges (projectile targeting/camera). BioShockOwnz

If you like Hack N slashes like myself, i would wait on SW:FU the demo was alot better the the full version of TH

The game deserves more of a 7 or 7.5 imo.. not a 5.

The bottomline is that the fun factor is very hard.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I'd recommend Too Human if you dig dungeon crawler hack n' slash games with a lot of loot. I wouldn't recommend to others, though. They'll think it's far too repetitive, because their not used to these kinda games. Anyways, it's a quality product, but it does have some rough edges (projectile targeting/camera). lge777

If you like Hack N slashes like myself, i would wait on SW:FU the demo was alot better the the full version of TH

Completely disagree. TFU did nothing for me. I'd recommend a rent for that one. There will be no replay value whatsoever. With TH, you have loot and different classes.

Insanely bad controls, the worst i've encountered in YEARS. That and it's story is about as interesting as dish water. The custscenes look like they were animated by animation students, not proffetionals (I should know, I am one lol). You can argue about its good points all day, but the fact is - the games industry has changed, I expect to get some serious bang for my buck when it comes to purchasing games, not something that feels like it's still atleast a year off release. That, and you spend more time in menus than a multiplayer match of ghost recon.

Not to mention all the stunts the company tried to pull, anyone still remember them sueing epic over their engine not being done for them lol, everyone else seemed to get on more than fine with the UIII engine.... Not realy a reason to dislike the game, but an interesting fact none-the-less.

.... You did ask.... lol

I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gamelge777

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

[QUOTE="lge777"] I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gameBioShockOwnz

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

lol, I love how you pass people that don't like this sub-par game off as 'casual gamers'. I recall playing the very first fps as it came out, and if anything, that makes me dislike too-human more.

[QUOTE="lge777"] I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gameBioShockOwnz

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

You are completely right on 1 part thats i am a " Casual Gamer" and just to get a idea we put in a copy of Kindom Heart 2 in the playstation 2 on a standard Tv and put in TH on the HDTV and KH2 look 100x better..It turned into a slam on my friend for wasteing 60$ on TH he has 2 Tv's next to each other so we can check a game or something on the other Tv..check it out yourself if you still have a PS2/Xbox

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="lge777"] I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gamelge777

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

You are completely right on 1 part thats i am a " Casual Gamer" and just to get a idea we put in a copy of Kindom Heart 2 in the playstation 2 on a standard Tv and put in TH on the HDTV and KH2 look 100x better..It turned into a slam on my friend for wasteing 60$ on TH he has to Tv next to each other so we can check a game or something on the other Tv

I have KH2 and I can tell you that that's completely untrue. It's at 480i resolution and has more washed out textures, while TH is at 720p and has crisper textures, thanks to the resolution bump to HD. You may like the artstyle in KH2, but to say it's technically better than TH is untrue.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="lge777"] I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gamekieran88

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

lol, I love how you pass people that don't like this sub-par game off as 'casual gamers'. I recall playing the very first fps as it came out, and if anything, that makes me dislike too-human more.

Why? Cause Too Human is an FPS? Too Human is a dungeon crawler hack n' slash.

[QUOTE="kieran88"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="lge777"] I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gameBioShockOwnz

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

lol, I love how you pass people that don't like this sub-par game off as 'casual gamers'. I recall playing the very first fps as it came out, and if anything, that makes me dislike too-human more.

Why? Cause Too Human is an FPS? Too Human is a dungeon crawler hack n' slash.

No, the point I was trying to make was; I've been playing games obsessively for a realy, realy long time. Seeing something like too-human and trying to say that if you don't like it you're a 'casual gamer' is a bit ignorant.

Gamespot reviews have sucked for a long time, and this new .5 increment system only made them worse.

Go to IGN for reviews.

[QUOTE="lge777"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="lge777"] I have played it at a friends house for a few hours....can start off with the PS2 graphics, A weak Story line, bad real bad controls what the hecks with it always being at the wrong angle to see where you are going ????and the targeting was horrid. i myself didn't like anything about the gameBioShockOwnz

PS2 graphics? Errr... no. I can fully acknowledge that it's not the best looking game out on consoles, but it doesn't look anywhere near a PS2 game. First, you have the resolution switch from 480i (PS2) to 720p (Xbox 360), so you have a high definition image providing a cleaner and crisper image than any PS2 game. Not to mention, the textures are well above anything that could've been offered on a PS2.

Also, I'd recommend learning the controls. Real bad? Really? Odd, I have mastered the controls and they don't give me any problems at all. Instead of expecting instant gratification, I like a challenge. And I'm glad Too Human doesn't cater to the casual gamers.

You are completely right on 1 part thats i am a " Casual Gamer" and just to get a idea we put in a copy of Kindom Heart 2 in the playstation 2 on a standard Tv and put in TH on the HDTV and KH2 look 100x better..It turned into a slam on my friend for wasteing 60$ on TH he has to Tv next to each other so we can check a game or something on the other Tv

I have KH2 and I can tell you that that's completely untrue. It's at 480i resolution and has more washed out textures, while TH is at 720p and has crisper textures, thanks to the resolution bump to HD. You may like the artstyle in KH2, but to say it's technically better than TH is untrue.

You have to wash out all the HD tech spec's and just put it in and see for yourself, i completely understand all about HD and how it works but remember the graphics code have to match the power of the system, if you match it up by eye you will see for yourself.

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

RJM117

You have to wash out all the HD tech spec's and just put it in and see for yourself, i completely understand all about HD and how it works but remember the graphics code have to match the power of the system, if you match it up by eye you will see for yourself.lge777

I know exactly what I'm talking about. On a technical level, a PS2 game doesn't look better than an Xbox 360 game. Heck, even Gun (a PS2/Xbox port) looked slightly better on Xbox 360. That's a fact. There's no way of dancing around it.

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

RJM117

Roflzorz wafflez intranet talks da funz. Anyway i think it deserves around a 7. Just read the review yourself. I've officially given up on Gamespot reviews. Ign gave a much better review and score.

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

RJM117

On a more serious note, stop taking reviews so damn seriously, it's what some guy tought about the game, maybe you will love it, if a game you like gets a bad review, who cares? You should'nt feel the urge to defend that game just cause some guy thought it sucks, maybe the guy who wrote the review has a different taste, thought about that?

[QUOTE="RJM117"]

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

craigalan23

Roflzorz wafflez intranet talks da funz. Anyway i think it deserves around a 7. Just read the review yourself. I've officially given up on Gamespot reviews. Ign gave a much better review and score.

It's all opinion anyway.... lulz.

[QUOTE="craigalan23"][QUOTE="RJM117"]

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

kieran88

Roflzorz wafflez intranet talks da funz. Anyway i think it deserves around a 7. Just read the review yourself. I've officially given up on Gamespot reviews. Ign gave a much better review and score.

It's all opinion anyway.... lulz.

Read the review yourself you'll laugh a lot. I never heard the word groove used so many times.

[QUOTE="kieran88"][QUOTE="craigalan23"][QUOTE="RJM117"]

Gamespot should have not gave it a 5.5

-

-

-

They SHOULD have gave it an EPIC FAIL award

roflcopter

craigalan23

Roflzorz wafflez intranet talks da funz. Anyway i think it deserves around a 7. Just read the review yourself. I've officially given up on Gamespot reviews. Ign gave a much better review and score.

It's all opinion anyway.... lulz.

Read the review yourself you'll laugh a lot. I never heard the word groove used so many times.

I wouldn't have commented if I hadn't read the review/ played the game.

okay, 5.5 is too low.

this game can be very frustrating in many places, mainly with the camera, controls, and sometimes the enemies. (those red guys that blow up on contact- If you've played the game you probably know what i'm talking about)

BUT

it is a good rpg, with deeeeep customization options and way more than enough items and loot drops. And, the action is really awesome when everything works properly. I'll admit, sometimes, it can be corny, like in cyberspace (opening a door by pushing in a wall, lifting it and releasing a ginormous fish... WTF?) or in the story and stuff, but yeah overall it deserved at least a 7. IGN reviewed it better, i think.

if there wasnt the whole ten year wait thing this game prbly woulda gotten better scores across the board. it seemed like ppl jsut wanted to rip on this game as soon as it came out, if neone paid any attention to metacrtic, the reivews came out insanely fast rite when it was released. its like ppl didnt even give it time or a second chance.