Vegas 2 ign review!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for leonhead
leonhead

1524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 leonhead
Member since 2007 • 1524 Posts

Yeah 8.4 i was expecting a 8.5-9.5 i probably won't be getting it, i don't really like tactical games.

http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/860/860324p1.html

but yeah i'm sure alot of people would still buy this.

Avatar image for kaycon11
kaycon11

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kaycon11
Member since 2008 • 442 Posts

Yeah 8.4 i was expecting a 8.5-9.5 i probably won't be getting it, i don't really like tactical games.

http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/860/860324p1.html

but yeah i'm sure alot of people would still buy this.

leonhead
I thought it would get a low to mid 8 because its pretty much an over priced expansion, sure it might have more content than a normal expansion would but overall, the game looks exactly the same, the only difference is you can sprint, which I will admit, is a welcomed change. I will prolly be buying this title tho, This will prolly be a title thats played by a good number of people over the summer.
Avatar image for AGMing
AGMing

1694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 AGMing
Member since 2003 • 1694 Posts
sounds like a fair score most FPS games are over rated and given 1-1.5 points higher than they should in most reviews.
Avatar image for sivasiva
sivasiva

1101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#4 sivasiva
Member since 2007 • 1101 Posts
I am sure this game deserves a rating of at least 9.0 .But no matter what, i will still get this game as i have been longing for a sequel of this game.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#5 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
One reviewer's opinion shouldn't sway you from thinking differently. The main reason it recieved an 8.4 score was because it was like a revamped R6V1. Some gamers prefer games not to change, except bring more content like what R6V2 did.
Avatar image for raylewisnfl52
raylewisnfl52

7146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 raylewisnfl52
Member since 2005 • 7146 Posts
well after watching the review I agree but most of the bad things arent really a big concern for me, like if they use the same music as the last one is no biggy,
Avatar image for Tree06
Tree06

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Tree06
Member since 2006 • 3552 Posts
I can't wait to play this game. Like I played the hell out of COD4. I need a fresh new multiplayer FPS.
Avatar image for volcomstoner180
volcomstoner180

4410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#8 volcomstoner180
Member since 2008 • 4410 Posts
ya that sucks tho that the co op is only for 2 players not 4, and also that they didnt change too much...i know its a proven formula but this is 2 years later than the orig was release...its time for a update and not just a expansion like game
Avatar image for davim84
davim84

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 davim84
Member since 2003 • 319 Posts

boring

zzzzzz

Avatar image for Lostboy1224
Lostboy1224

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 Lostboy1224
Member since 2007 • 3425 Posts
You don't really need to change that much, cause the first game was really good. New weapons, maps, sprint mode, and single player story is all I really need to enjoy it.
Browse Boards
Jump to Top

×

Move topic to another board

Pick a board and hit submit

  • (Or search for a more specific forum)
    • Close