What did you think of the MW3 Trailer?

Just saw it, looked terrible imo. I saw rectangle pixelated orange beams for bullets, unacceptable.

I thought it was great.

It looks kinda cool, but it still looks like the same old game.

I just watched it, the COD series is like Madden...theres one every year now it seems and there really isn't much more you can do with this series, same old same old. The trailer itself was a little exciting in a way though, just like if you'd watch a preview for an action movie. Most likely my Brother will be getting it so I'll just play his copy.

This will probably be the first COD that I'm going to wait for a price drop.

I just watched it, the COD series is like Madden...theres one every year now it seems and there really isn't much more you can do with this series, same old same old. The trailer itself was a little exciting in a way though, just like if you'd watch a preview for an action movie. Most likely my Brother will be getting it so I'll just play his copy.

mother_farter

I wasn't impressed at all, I got tired of COD since COD MW2, so no matter what I kind of wasn't going to like it. Although I gave it a chance and put down 15.75 just incase. But I'm gonna go back to gamestop and put it down on something else now.

People might hate this next thing I say, but Activision sucks. They ruined one genre of music by releasing yearly/too many music games in Guitar Hero. I think they like to drag down games they sell.

I hope I am not the only one who think Call of Duty had more than its fair share of fun. Too many and now its just getting to be dull.

It was what I expected. Whether that is good or bad has yet to be determined.

It looks Modern Warfare as ****. And, as much as it hurts me to say it, I can't freakin' wait.

Meh! Looked nice,But probally another on rails,do some automatic driving trigger a nice explosion,linear,too many cutsscene,move there trigger some enemy spawn,use yet another C-130 CoD.

It just looked like the same game. Nothing new.

Just kidding. It looked great! The CoD trailers always get mereally excited for the campaign, even though I'll spend most of the time on MP.

Meh! Looked nice,But probally another on rails,do some automatic driving trigger a nice explosion,linear,too many cutsscene,move there trigger some enemy spawn,use yet another C-130 CoD.

CUDGEdave

We haven't used a C-130 in CoD yet. We have used an AC-130.

It's literally the exact same as the MW2 trailer. No thanks.

Looked like crap compared to Battlefield 3. What else is new. They are releasing a game every single year. People are going to buy Call Of Duty because of the name now. It can be garbage.. but people will still pick it up and eat it all up.

The trailer looked really good, but every Call of Duty trailer is well made. I'm going to skip this because I'm just not interested in anymore CoDs.

It's literally the exact same as the MW2 trailer. No thanks.

realguitarhero5

[QUOTE="realguitarhero5"]

It's literally the exact same as the MW2 trailer. No thanks.

Kaze_no_Mirai

Meh, Black Ops is my last CoD. MW3 looks like the same game yet again. BF3 is what I'm excited for.

Looked like they mixed a bit of halo's storyline and everything else from Call of Duty 4, but with different characters.

[QUOTE="Kaze_no_Mirai"][QUOTE="realguitarhero5"]

It's literally the exact same as the MW2 trailer. No thanks.

Victors_Valiant

when i see it , my mouth went O . unfortunely it's sad to see some gamers say it's bad. however im looking forward for it somehow. :)

Looks good but if you look good in the trailer then you see the same things as in mw2... example:

Only this time with some moreaction on the background.

[QUOTE="realguitarhero5"]

It's literally the exact same as the MW2 trailer. No thanks.

Kaze_no_Mirai

it look like cod4 and mw2, actually it somehow looks worse

Not sure why everyone seems to assume that one can only purchase either BF3 or MW3. I'm getting both because both satisfy different tastes in multiplayer gaming--fast and brutal in CoD and tactical/strategic in BF. Both look great, and I suspect both will be great in different ways. Why limit yourself to only one when you have 6 months to save up for both? Hell, throw Gears 3 in as well and you won't need a new MP title for a year or longer. As for MW3 offering more of the same, what else would you expect? It's a formula that works brilliantly, has revolutionized most online FPS games, and, if the sales are any indication, that millions of people love. I don't want a radical shift in what CoD offers anymore than I would want a radical shift in what BF or any other established franchise offers. Part of the reason I know I'll like the game is that I know I like what it offers; to move away from that would be to risk the loss of my purchase along with potentially millions of others. Not a wise choice, and one that could just as easily end in disaster as success. Leave major changes and risks to new IPs and leave my standby titles alone, please.sixgears2

[QUOTE="sixgears2"]Not sure why everyone seems to assume that one can only purchase either BF3 or MW3. I'm getting both because both satisfy different tastes in multiplayer gaming--fast and brutal in CoD and tactical/strategic in BF. Both look great, and I suspect both will be great in different ways. Why limit yourself to only one when you have 6 months to save up for both? Hell, throw Gears 3 in as well and you won't need a new MP title for a year or longer. As for MW3 offering more of the same, what else would you expect? It's a formula that works brilliantly, has revolutionized most online FPS games, and, if the sales are any indication, that millions of people love. I don't want a radical shift in what CoD offers anymore than I would want a radical shift in what BF or any other established franchise offers. Part of the reason I know I'll like the game is that I know I like what it offers; to move away from that would be to risk the loss of my purchase along with potentially millions of others. Not a wise choice, and one that could just as easily end in disaster as success. Leave major changes and risks to new IPs and leave my standby titles alone, please.Kaze_no_Mirai

I'm actually really surprised ANYONE likes Infinity Ward's teaser trailers, this one was just as god awful as MW2. it did not get me pumped for the game in the slightest. I'm definitely picking up Battlefield 3, but this will be the first Call of Duty that I won't be preordering. If it's anything like MW2, I'm going to hate it with all my being. I'll probably still give it a shot, but I PROBABLY won't get it. Personally, I wish they'd refrain from releasing new entries every year. Map packs and gun packs on a regular, scheduled basis would be a much better option for me. New Call of Duty games should only come around for sylistic changes, like a Cold War-era game as we saw in Black Ops, or WWII-era, or modern-era like Infinity Ward's work. We really don't need a new game every year.creeping-deth87

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]I'm actually really surprised ANYONE likes Infinity Ward's teaser trailers, this one was just as god awful as MW2. it did not get me pumped for the game in the slightest. I'm definitely picking up Battlefield 3, but this will be the first Call of Duty that I won't be preordering. If it's anything like MW2, I'm going to hate it with all my being. I'll probably still give it a shot, but I PROBABLY won't get it. Personally, I wish they'd refrain from releasing new entries every year. Map packs and gun packs on a regular, scheduled basis would be a much better option for me. New Call of Duty games should only come around for sylistic changes, like a Cold War-era game as we saw in Black Ops, or WWII-era, or modern-era like Infinity Ward's work. We really don't need a new game every year.sixgears2

@speedfog, great comparison.

I too am tired of COD and may be giving BF3 a shot.

[QUOTE="sixgears2"][QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]I'm actually really surprised ANYONE likes Infinity Ward's teaser trailers, this one was just as god awful as MW2. it did not get me pumped for the game in the slightest. I'm definitely picking up Battlefield 3, but this will be the first Call of Duty that I won't be preordering. If it's anything like MW2, I'm going to hate it with all my being. I'll probably still give it a shot, but I PROBABLY won't get it. Personally, I wish they'd refrain from releasing new entries every year. Map packs and gun packs on a regular, scheduled basis would be a much better option for me. New Call of Duty games should only come around for sylistic changes, like a Cold War-era game as we saw in Black Ops, or WWII-era, or modern-era like Infinity Ward's work. We really don't need a new game every year.creeping-deth87

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"][QUOTE="sixgears2"] Why would they pass up a yearly opportunity to sell over 20 million copies of a single game in 6 months? That's more than most publishers sell out of their entire portfolio in an enitire year. Besides, I'm still not tired of the Call of Duty formula because it is simply far and away better than nearly any comparable game out there. You can flame all you want, but I suspect there are tens of millions of people who agree with me. It's fun, people love it, and it makes mountains of money. Can you honestly say you wouldn't do the same in Activision's place?sixgears2

[QUOTE="sixgears2"][QUOTE="creeping-deth87"] I never said Activision had a good reason for going with my idea of regular content, I was trying to say it would be good for the gamers themselves. I, personally, would have much preferred that Call of Duty 4 was continuously updated with maps, guns and perks until about last year or so, where we could have gotten another new game - and I'm sure a lot of people who fell in love with this franchise with Call of Duty 4 would agree with me. I'm sure there ARE tens of millions of people who agree with you that the COD formula is fun, that really has no bearing on anything that I said. People who love COD would still love additional content and longer post-launch support for their games. A yearly installment is absolutely unnecessary. I would do the same thing in Activision's place, but I am not a businessman. I don't come onto this forum and respond to everyone's opinion as if I'm Bobby Kotick. My opinion is first and foremost that of your typical, average joe gamer. Bearing that in mind, I, personally, would much prefer regular content rather than regular instalments. Does this mean I don't understand the reason that Activision does what it does? Of course I do, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with it just because it makes them more money.creeping-deth87

It was the most stupidest trailers i have ever seen. this game is going to be exactly what you played before same old run n gun sh%t

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"][QUOTE="sixgears2"] So you openly admit that your opinion is basically indefensible in light of the reality of the game industry as a business? I guess there isn't much else to say, then. I'm no businessman. I just prefer to ground my hopes and expectations in reality instead of some nebulous concept of what the average Joe would like to happen whether it makes sense or not.sixgears2