What happened to the days of real tactical shooters.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

Games such as ghost recon, rainbow six black arrow, splinter cell chaos theory,games where each multiplayerround consisted of one life, making the player have to think about his moves.

Games where it took true skill to make a kill, where the sense of achievement was always high as everyong one was much more careful not to die.

What happened to making people wait in the lobby for the dead, as they continued to view the action, discussing the 'still alive' players movements.

Those moments where you were the last person alive on your team and you knew everyone else was watching you, your heart would start to race as you new it was time to show your skills, possibly managing to kill the whole other team and consequently returning to an applause in the lobby from your team who were watching.

I know there are still last man standing games on Graw 2, but no one ever plays them, everyone plays sharp shooter as I immagine no one can be bothered to wait around if they die, they would rather instantly have another chance, and then another one, and another one, so everyone ends up running around like headless chickens.

Is this what the masses have done to games? where have all the true hardcore tactical gamers gone?

Now everyone plays call of duty, a game of mindless relentless action... and this is obviously what the masses want, as it clearly always sells so well...

I know I am a small minority, but this wasnt how games used to be, and i believe games will never be the way they were again.

Infact things will only get worse, as systems such as the wii have had such success, microsoft and sony are already following the wii on their main objective which is and always will be to make money, therefore sell as many units as possible, no matter how bad the quality of the games are.

Avatar image for sharkman123
sharkman123

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 sharkman123
Member since 2007 • 69 Posts

although call of duty does give you an infinite amount of lives you can play search and destroy that is basically what you just explaind. You can also play gears of war/gears of war 2 exicution rainbow six vegas 2. there are many choices of the types of games you like with lots of players and i no lots of peole who hate cod so not everyone plays it

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

i have playe on call of duty search and destroy, its is not the same as what i am talking about, the movement of call of duty is far too quick to ever be considere a true tactical shooter, representing a real life situation. The fact that when you are moving you have less of a good aim as when you are not moving is what makes a game feel realistic, and what creates the most tactical situations.

Avatar image for sharkman123
sharkman123

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 sharkman123
Member since 2007 • 69 Posts

But Aim dissabilatys is a feature in call of duty and are you saying that its not a good tactical game because people run to fast?

Avatar image for AdjacentLives
AdjacentLives

1173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AdjacentLives
Member since 2009 • 1173 Posts

Games such as ghost recon, rainbow six black arrow, splinter cell chaos theory,games where each multiplayerround consisted of one life, making the player have to think about his moves.

Games where it took true skill to make a kill, where the sense of achievement was always high as everyong one was much more careful not to die.

What happened to making people wait in the lobby for the dead, as they continued to view the action, discussing the 'still alive' players movements.

Those moments where you were the last person alive on your team and you knew everyone else was watching you, your heart would start to race as you new it was time to show your skills, possibly managing to kill the whole other team and consequently returning to an applause in the lobby from your team who were watching.

I know there are still last man standing games on Graw 2, but no one ever plays them, everyone plays sharp shooter as I immagine no one can be bothered to wait around if they die, they would rather instantly have another chance, and then another one, and another one, so everyone ends up running around like headless chickens.

Is this what the masses have done to games? where have all the true hardcore tactical gamers gone?

Now everyone plays call of duty, a game of mindless relentless action... and this is obviously what the masses want, as it clearly always sells so well...

I know I am a small minority, but this wasnt how games used to be, and i believe games will never be the way they were again.

Infact things will only get worse, as systems such as the wii have had such success, microsoft and sony are already following the wii on their main objective which is and always will be to make money, therefore sell as many units as possible, no matter how bad the quality of the games are.

ULYSSES2004

You missed the greatest online FPS of all time. Counter Strike Source.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
not because people run fast, its the movement as a whole, running turning, topping, crouching etc. its an arcade shooter at the end of the day, its not trying to be a realistic shooter
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

Boo hoo. God forbid that not everyone like what you like. Times change, and tastes change. There are a whole horde of people with your mentality at your local nursing home, all mad because kids don't like to play with jacks and push little metal wheels down the road with sticks anymore.

Games where it took true skill to make a kill, where the sense of achievement was always high as everyong one was much more careful not to die.

ULYSSES2004

If I had a dime for every time someone, when complaining about genres or subgenres of gaming that he doesn't like, said that they take no skill...

What happened to making people wait in the lobby for the dead, as they continued to view the action, discussing the 'still alive' players movements.

ULYSSES2004

In my opinion: That's ****ing boring. If I wanted to watch people play a game, I'd go to the bar and watch football.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#8 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

Could you possibly switch to PC gaming? Maybe something along the lines of ARMA 2 or Operation Flashpoint 2 would better suit you.

Also, both the Xbox 360 & PS3 have a bunch of quality games. You should have been smarter & not seek realistic shooters on consoles when everyone knows that sort of gameplay resides on PC. So basically, stop complaining & don't post comments like the no quality one here.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
do you think anyone else wants to sit in the lobby watching? the answer is no one does, but that is what you get for dying, i assure you the next round you will be more careful and before you know it you wont ever find yourself in the death lobby as you will have learned. The truth is you are the majority, and thats why games are the way they are today... kids have no patience, no will to learn, no understanding of the greater sense of achievement of gradually learning something and getting better. They just want to get on there and run in kill, kill again, die, run back in throw grenade, crouch, get shot from behind, run in again, and so on...
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#10 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

You do realize that most these games aren't developed by MS & Sony, why complain about them when your biggest culprit of a game Modern Warfare 2 was devolped by Infinity Ward & published by Activision.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
i tried them out, but they have gone down the other extreme, where it is all way too much and not easy enough to get into a quick and fun online match, as much as i liked playing through some of the missions of arma, online i didnt get into one good game, just people doing random things all over the place, im also looking for something a little more close quater, not fighting over an entire island where it takes half and hour to get to anybody. Add that to the fact that owining a pc the can run arma 2 well is gonna cost you a fortune and i gave up on pc gaming...
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#12 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

That last part of your original post really made me LOL. You act as if it wasn't a company's main objective before to make money...............???

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
i spoke about sony and microsoft because they are now going to try and copy the wii, but ultimately i dont even blame them, all of these people are just trying to make money, they couldnt care less if a game isnt much different as long as it sells, and the fact of the matter is they do sell theefore the only people i can truely blame are all the gamers that buy these re hashed games.
Avatar image for thedigitals
thedigitals

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 thedigitals
Member since 2005 • 947 Posts

I used to feel the same way but Modern Warfare & now MW2 are so good I really don't care anymore. & with 3rd person tactical and search n destroy (as mentioned) as well as the hardcore modes, there's still some tactics to be found even in MW2.

GRAW 2 but my fav tactical shooter on the 360 has been Rainbow Six 1, I went over to the PS3 for a while to see if Socom Confrontation could live up to Socom 2 or even Socom 3 but trust me it doesn't. MW2 is my new crack

Avatar image for thedigitals
thedigitals

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 thedigitals
Member since 2005 • 947 Posts

^ should've said GRAW 2 was a good game but my fav 360 tactical shooter was Rainbow Six VEGAS 1

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
of course the have always been in it to make money, but before there were not so many gamers, i believe gamers that were a little more piccky than or average gamer today. As more of the masses have got involved games have been simplified, games that are too hard dont sell very well, so all the developers follow the trend.
Avatar image for LostSoul781
LostSoul781

1630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 LostSoul781
Member since 2003 • 1630 Posts

people got bored and they became unpopular

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#18 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
i spoke about sony and microsoft because they are now going to try and copy the wii, but ultimately i dont even blame them, all of these people are just trying to make money, they couldnt care less if a game isnt much different as long as it sells, and the fact of the matter is they do sell theefore the only people i can truely blame are all the gamers that buy these re hashed games.ULYSSES2004
Of course they are trying to make money, wouldn't make sense for them not to. There are plenty of awesome games available & a bunch more currently in development, so what really is your deal man? So what the majority likes MW 2, get over it. I prefer Battlefield & Ghost Recon myself, both series have games on the way.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

kids have no patience, no will to learn, no understanding of the greater sense of achievement of gradually learning something and getting better.ULYSSES2004

Nevermind the presumption of making assessments of peoples' character based on their hobbies, you are literally making a "Kids these days" statement, in regards to something that is under 20 years old. That is ridiculous. What's even more ridiculous, is you didn't even reference any old shooters in your opening post. Black Arrow is like, five or six years old. You're acting like all this not wanting to wait around in the damn death-lobby is a new thing. I guess you somehow avoided Quake when you were younger.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]i spoke about sony and microsoft because they are now going to try and copy the wii, but ultimately i dont even blame them, all of these people are just trying to make money, they couldnt care less if a game isnt much different as long as it sells, and the fact of the matter is they do sell theefore the only people i can truely blame are all the gamers that buy these re hashed games.shawn7324
Of course they are trying to make money, wouldn't make sense for them not to. There are plenty of awesome games available & a bunch more currently in development, so what really is your deal man? So what the majority likes MW 2, get over it. I prefer Battlefield & Ghost Recon myself, both series have games on the way.

Whats my deal?? Have you still not understood??? NO MORE TRUE TACTICAL SHOOTERS!!! did you ever play black arrow? or the first ghost recons?
Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]kids have no patience, no will to learn, no understanding of the greater sense of achievement of gradually learning something and getting better.Palantas

Nevermind the presumption of making assessments of peoples' character based on their hobbies, you are literally making a "Kids these days" statement, in regards to something that is under 20 years old. That is ridiculous. What's even more ridiculous, is you didn't even reference any old shooters in your opening post. Black Arrow is like, five or six years old. You're acting like all this not wanting to wait around in the damn death-lobby is a new thing. I guess you somehow avoided Quake when you were younger.

No the death in the lobby is an old thing, an old thing that has been dropped and according to me should be brought back. I refer to the majority as kids, because i believe most of the new comers to gaming are of the younger generation, i didnt mean any offence to you in particular.
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#22 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

[QUOTE="Palantas"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]kids have no patience, no will to learn, no understanding of the greater sense of achievement of gradually learning something and getting better.ULYSSES2004

Nevermind the presumption of making assessments of peoples' character based on their hobbies, you are literally making a "Kids these days" statement, in regards to something that is under 20 years old. That is ridiculous. What's even more ridiculous, is you didn't even reference any old shooters in your opening post. Black Arrow is like, five or six years old. You're acting like all this not wanting to wait around in the damn death-lobby is a new thing. I guess you somehow avoided Quake when you were younger.

No the death in the lobby is an old thing, an old thing that has been dropped and according to me should be brought back. I refer to the majority as kids, because i believe most of the new comers to gaming are of the younger generation, i didnt mean any offence to you in particular.

Well yeah new gamers would most likely be young since that is when myself & most others started themselves. So your freaking out because younger kids are more into the Call Of Duty series than a realistic must strategically plan out each attack will die with 1 shot kind of game?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Xbox casual gaming happened, basicly all games are simple so more people can play them, and i say x360 because games on ps3 and pc are more hardcore on what they do!! Anyway atleast thats what i think happend, game developers make their games more casual so more people would buy them, and xbox is best when it comes to casual gaming!!! Remember halo and fable;)
Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="shawn7324"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"][QUOTE="Palantas"]

Nevermind the presumption of making assessments of peoples' character based on their hobbies, you are literally making a "Kids these days" statement, in regards to something that is under 20 years old. That is ridiculous. What's even more ridiculous, is you didn't even reference any old shooters in your opening post. Black Arrow is like, five or six years old. You're acting like all this not wanting to wait around in the damn death-lobby is a new thing. I guess you somehow avoided Quake when you were younger.

No the death in the lobby is an old thing, an old thing that has been dropped and according to me should be brought back. I refer to the majority as kids, because i believe most of the new comers to gaming are of the younger generation, i didnt mean any offence to you in particular.

Well yeah new gamers would most likely be young since that is when myself & most others started themselves. So your freaking out because younger kids are more into the Call Of Duty series than a realistic must strategically plan out each attack will die with 1 shot kind of game?

First of all im not freaking out, second, i dont care that the younger generation like there run n gun fps, all i was complaining about as you can see from my topic title, is that there are no more tactical shooters for gamers like me and a few others who prefer and more tactical approach. Now if you had played the first xbox when xbox live was in in its first years of existence, you would have found that yes there was halo 2 and a few other arcade type shooters, but there was also ghost recon 1, rainbow six black arrow, and a few others which was for players who preffered tactical shooters. Now that the market has opened up the developers are fully aware of that fact that the gamers who prefer tactical shooters are fewer than those which prefer run n gun style shooters. Therefore even those games which were more for the tactical gamers, are influenced towards making there new games more acadey. For example if you go online on graw 2 you will never find a game where people play without respawns. On the first ghost recon on the xbox, the majority of people played on last man standing therefore no respawns. Capisc??
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

No the death in the lobby is an old thing, an old thing that has been dropped and according to me should be brought back.ULYSSES2004

Sitting in the death lobby does not predate not sitting in the death lobby. If you think it is, then you started playing shooters sometime after the '94-'96 timeframe.

As for something being brought back, something should be brought back only for a good reason. Example: People should exercise more. When discussing something like gaming, which is all purely preference anyway, nothing should be brought back. Gaming will develop as popular taste dictates. I'm sure there are a few people around who pine for the days of text-only multiuser dungeons, and think more people should play those instead of these new-fangled 3D graphics games. I disagree. If you don't like the way shooters are developing, then I suggest you start a forum or clan just for people who want to play a particular sty|e of game.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#26 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]Xbox casual gaming happened, basicly all games are simple so more people can play them, and i say x360 because games on ps3 and pc are more hardcore on what they do!! Anyway atleast thats what i think happend, game developers make their games more casual so more people would buy them, and xbox is best when it comes to casual gaming!!! Remember halo and fable;)

So the majority of games on the Xbox 360 console are intended for casual gamers, is that what your saying?
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

there are no more tactical shooters for gamers like me

ULYSSES2004

graw 2

ULYSSES2004

Advanced Warfighter 2 is three years old. And they're making another GRAW game. So obviously there are games for gamers like you.

What you're complaining about is this:

For example if you go online on graw 2 you will never find a game where people play without respawns.

ULYSSES2004

That despite there being games for gamers like you, people don't want to play the modes you like in them. Well, I dunno what to tell you. People like what they like, and there's nothing wrong with that. See my previous post for more commentary/suggestions.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#28 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
[QUOTE="shawn7324"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"] No the death in the lobby is an old thing, an old thing that has been dropped and according to me should be brought back. I refer to the majority as kids, because i believe most of the new comers to gaming are of the younger generation, i didnt mean any offence to you in particular.ULYSSES2004

Well yeah new gamers would most likely be young since that is when myself & most others started themselves. So your freaking out because younger kids are more into the Call Of Duty series than a realistic must strategically plan out each attack will die with 1 shot kind of game?

First of all im not freaking out, second, i dont care that the younger generation like there run n gun fps, all i was complaining about as you can see from my topic title, is that there are no more tactical shooters for gamers like me and a few others who prefer and more tactical approach. Now if you had played the first xbox when xbox live was in in its first years of existence, you would have found that yes there was halo 2 and a few other arcade type shooters, but there was also ghost recon 1, rainbow six black arrow, and a few others which was for players who preffered tactical shooters. Now that the market has opened up the developers are fully aware of that fact that the gamers who prefer tactical shooters are fewer than those which prefer run n gun style shooters. Therefore even those games which were more for the tactical gamers, are influenced towards making there new games more acadey. For example if you go online on graw 2 you will never find a game where people play without respawns. On the first ghost recon on the xbox, the majority of people played on last man standing therefore no respawns. Capisc??

There are tactical shooters available, GRAW & RSV are very good ones, so basically your not actually complaining about the lack of games but rather the lack of other gamers whom like to play those games the same way as yourself.
Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="Palantas"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]

there are no more tactical shooters for gamers like me

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]

graw 2

Advanced Warfighter 2 is three years old. And they're making another GRAW game. So obviously there are games for gamers like you.

What you're complaining about is this:

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]

For example if you go online on graw 2 you will never find a game where people play without respawns.

That despite there being games for gamers like you, people don't want to play the modes you like in them. Well, I dunno what to tell you. People like what they like, and there's nothing wrong with that. See my previous post for more commentary/suggestions.

Games like graw 2 have moved towards being more arcadey, consequently they no longer work as well in a respawn game, the same with vegas 2, the changes they have made work better in respawn games.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

...despite there being games for gamers like you, people don't want to play the modes you like in them.I

...your not actually complaining about the lack of games but rather the lack of other gamers whom like to play those games the same way as yourself.shawn7324

Jinx.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="I"]...despite there being games for gamers like you, people don't want to play the modes you like in them.Palantas

...your not actually complaining about the lack of games but rather the lack of other gamers whom like to play those games the same way as yourself.shawn7324

Jinx.

And finally i Wrote Games like graw 2 have moved towards being more arcadey, consequently they no longer work as well in a respawn game, the same with vegas 2, the changes they have made work better in respawn games.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

Games like graw 2 have moved towards being more arcadey, consequently they no longer work as well in a respawn game, the same with vegas 2, the changes they have made work better in respawn games.ULYSSES2004

I think every game works better with quick respawns, as the death lobby is ****ing boring, but that's just my opinion. In regards to your comment here, would you like to elaborate on these changes? I haven't played GRAW 2, but Vegas and Vegas 2 were so damn similiar they could be ports of one another. What changes?

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]Games like graw 2 have moved towards being more arcadey, consequently they no longer work as well in a respawn game, the same with vegas 2, the changes they have made work better in respawn games.Palantas

I think every game works better with quick respawns, as the death lobby is ****ing boring, but that's just my opinion. In regards to your comment here, would you like to elaborate on these changes? I haven't played GRAW 2, but Vegas and Vegas 2 were so damn similiar they could be ports of one another. What changes?

Im not refering to the first rainbow six vegas, im talking about rainbow 6 black arrow by far the best version of the series, a game that was out six years ago, and trust me there are huge diferences.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

Write them down.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#35 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]Games like graw 2 have moved towards being more arcadey, consequently they no longer work as well in a respawn game, the same with vegas 2, the changes they have made work better in respawn games.Palantas

I think every game works better with quick respawns, as the death lobby is ****ing boring, but that's just my opinion. In regards to your comment here, would you like to elaborate on these changes? I haven't played GRAW 2, but Vegas and Vegas 2 were so damn similiar they could be ports of one another. What changes?

True on Vegas comment. GRAW isn't like a arcade type shooter & is by far the most Tactical shooter available on consoles this gen. I'm not following TC's changes at all. He is clearly pissed that no one wants to play a no respawn match with him & is trying to come up with other reasoning, no sure why though.
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#36 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
[QUOTE="Palantas"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]Games like graw 2 have moved towards being more arcadey, consequently they no longer work as well in a respawn game, the same with vegas 2, the changes they have made work better in respawn games.ULYSSES2004

I think every game works better with quick respawns, as the death lobby is ****ing boring, but that's just my opinion. In regards to your comment here, would you like to elaborate on these changes? I haven't played GRAW 2, but Vegas and Vegas 2 were so damn similiar they could be ports of one another. What changes?

Im not refering to the first rainbow six vegas, im talking about rainbow 6 black arrow by far the best version of the series, a game that was out six years ago, and trust me there are huge diferences.

Yes the Tactical Shooter has drifted away from it's hardcore strategic gameplay, but current games are awesome in their own ways. GRAW & GRAW 2 are both freaking awesome via Co-Op & Online.
Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"][QUOTE="Palantas"]

I think every game works better with quick respawns, as the death lobby is ****ing boring, but that's just my opinion. In regards to your comment here, would you like to elaborate on these changes? I haven't played GRAW 2, but Vegas and Vegas 2 were so damn similiar they could be ports of one another. What changes?

shawn7324

Im not refering to the first rainbow six vegas, im talking about rainbow 6 black arrow by far the best version of the series, a game that was out six years ago, and trust me there are huge diferences.

Yes the Tactical Shooter has drifted away from it's hardcore strategic gameplay, but current games are awesome in their own ways. GRAW & GRAW 2 are both freaking awesome via Co-Op & Online.

Did you ever play any of the original ghost recons online on the orignial xbox? or even black arrow?

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#39 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

[QUOTE="shawn7324"][QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"] Im not refering to the first rainbow six vegas, im talking about rainbow 6 black arrow by far the best version of the series, a game that was out six years ago, and trust me there are huge diferences.ULYSSES2004

Yes the Tactical Shooter has drifted away from it's hardcore strategic gameplay, but current games are awesome in their own ways. GRAW & GRAW 2 are both freaking awesome via Co-Op & Online.

Did you ever play any of the original ghost recons online on the orignial xbox? or even black arrow?

Yes I have, still own Black Arrow & nearly every game in both series. I agreed with you that Tactical Shooters aren't nearly as intense these days as before, but I'm sorry if I found GRAWs online very enjoyable.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="shawn7324"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]

Yes the Tactical Shooter has drifted away from it's hardcore strategic gameplay, but current games are awesome in their own ways. GRAW & GRAW 2 are both freaking awesome via Co-Op & Online. shawn7324

Did you ever play any of the original ghost recons online on the orignial xbox? or even black arrow?

Yes I have, still own Black Arrow & nearly every game in both series. I agreed with you that Tactical Shooters aren't nearly as intense these days as before, but I'm sorry if I found GRAWs online very enjoyable.

Yes you own black arrow, and you confirmed it is the best in its series, however you have not confirmed if you have and played any of the orignal xbox 1 ghost recons. Do you?
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#41 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

[QUOTE="shawn7324"]

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]

Did you ever play any of the original ghost recons online on the orignial xbox? or even black arrow?

ULYSSES2004

Yes I have, still own Black Arrow & nearly every game in both series. I agreed with you that Tactical Shooters aren't nearly as intense these days as before, but I'm sorry if I found GRAWs online very enjoyable.

Yes you own black arrow, and you confirmed it is the best in its series, however you have not confirmed if you have and played any of the orignal xbox 1 ghost recons. Do you?

The comment there about me owning nearly every game in both series, that mean both the Rainbow Six & Ghost Recon series. I would say either Black Arrow or Raven Shield. It wasn't maybe 6 months ago I played through Summit Strike.

Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"][QUOTE="shawn7324"] Yes I have, still own Black Arrow & nearly every game in both series. I agreed with you that Tactical Shooters aren't nearly as intense these days as before, but I'm sorry if I found GRAWs online very enjoyable.

shawn7324

Yes you own black arrow, and you confirmed it is the best in its series, however you have not confirmed if you have and played any of the orignal xbox 1 ghost recons. Do you?

The comment there about me owning nearly every game in both series, that mean both the Rainbow Six & Ghost Recon series. I would say either Black Arrow or Raven Shield.

Well if you played any of the orignial ghost recons you would know how much better they were online then the graw series. As much as graw might be enjoyable at time, the orignials were in a different league all together in terms of tactical shooter.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#43 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

[QUOTE="shawn7324"][QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"] Yes you own black arrow, and you confirmed it is the best in its series, however you have not confirmed if you have and played any of the orignal xbox 1 ghost recons. Do you?ULYSSES2004

The comment there about me owning nearly every game in both series, that mean both the Rainbow Six & Ghost Recon series. I would say either Black Arrow or Raven Shield.

Well if you played any of the orignial ghost recons you would know how much better they were online then the graw series. As much as graw might be enjoyable at time, the orignials were in a different league all together in terms of tactical shooter.

True the older games are much more suited to the genre, but knowing that never stopped me from enjoying GRAW, RSV, ARMA, or OP Flashpoint Today.
Avatar image for ULYSSES2004
ULYSSES2004

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ULYSSES2004
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="shawn7324"][QUOTE="ULYSSES2004"]

The comment there about me owning nearly every game in both series, that mean both the Rainbow Six & Ghost Recon series. I would say either Black Arrow or Raven Shield. shawn7324

Well if you played any of the orignial ghost recons you would know how much better they were online then the graw series. As much as graw might be enjoyable at time, the orignials were in a different league all together in terms of tactical shooter.

True the older games are much more suited to the genre, but knowing that never stopped me from enjoying GRAW, RSV, ARMA, or OP Flashpoint Today.

Hey i too at one point was enjoying rainbow six vegas and the first the graw series, but the fact that we are both in agreement that these games were not as good as their predecessors that came out more than 6 years ago says a lot right?? It should be the opposite way round, i.e games get better as technology and ideas improve???
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#45 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]Xbox casual gaming happened, basicly all games are simple so more people can play them, and i say x360 because games on ps3 and pc are more hardcore on what they do!! Anyway atleast thats what i think happend, game developers make their games more casual so more people would buy them, and xbox is best when it comes to casual gaming!!! Remember halo and fable;)

What a joke. The PS3 and 360 have nearly identicle game releases. And the PC, aside from Valve and Blizzard the same can be said.
Avatar image for oUndauntedo
oUndauntedo

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 oUndauntedo
Member since 2009 • 84 Posts

Better question:

Do you have a problem with every modern video game? Or is it just those on the Xbox 360?

I ask because you have at least five threads whining about almost every element of video games, if you really hate them so much why not get a different hobby?