What has better graphics battlefield bad company 2 os COD modern warfare 2?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for II-TAGGART-II
II-TAGGART-II

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 II-TAGGART-II
Member since 2008 • 26 Posts

They both seem to have extremely good graphics but I want to know what people think about it

Avatar image for DanEllacott
DanEllacott

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DanEllacott
Member since 2009 • 62 Posts

I've played MW2 to death but only seen videos of Battlefield. In seeing that, Battlefield appears to have the better graphics.

Avatar image for JordanizPro
JordanizPro

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 JordanizPro
Member since 2009 • 1912 Posts

Even though i perfer Modern Warfare 2 over BBC2,Battlefield Bad Company 2 has waay more advanced graphics than Modern Warfare 2

Avatar image for DanEllacott
DanEllacott

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DanEllacott
Member since 2009 • 62 Posts
in saying that **
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
Bad Company 2 looks better, MW2 looks worse but runs smoother.
Avatar image for Colin1192
Colin1192

6221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Colin1192
Member since 2008 • 6221 Posts

Graphics wise, I think they are pretty close, but I am no graphics expert.

Avatar image for dragonfly110
dragonfly110

27955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#7 dragonfly110
Member since 2008 • 27955 Posts

definetly battlefield. Although MW2 does have a smoother framerate.

Avatar image for 821dan128
821dan128

678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 821dan128
Member since 2007 • 678 Posts

stop kidding yourselves! modern warfare2 has the superior graphics if any1 says otherwise they're wrong. IGN's review backs me up so see for yourself.

Avatar image for JayQproductions
JayQproductions

1806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 JayQproductions
Member since 2007 • 1806 Posts

MW2 has the better graphics, BFBC looks almost cartoony and cell shaded, especially the character models and guns.

Avatar image for DamianAlexander
DamianAlexander

3762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DamianAlexander
Member since 2008 • 3762 Posts

Modern Warfare 2 by far, but that's about all that it has on Bad Company 2.

Avatar image for laliberte11
laliberte11

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 laliberte11
Member since 2008 • 4246 Posts

i've played both, and it is quite hard to tell actually, they both look pretty much the same

Avatar image for raylewisnfl52
raylewisnfl52

7146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 raylewisnfl52
Member since 2005 • 7146 Posts
Battlefield for sure
Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
Having played both, I can say for sure, MW2. Mainly due to it's level design, attention to detail, and color palette. Battlefield Bad Company 2's improvements include the beautiful backdrops and vistas, but that's contradicting to it's bland level designs. MW2 does have it's issues with low-res textures though. You can scan the environment and find a lot of low-res parts. It's noticeable but there's so much detail, sometimes it doesn't matter. And like others have stated, better frame rate.
Avatar image for Crayzorder
Crayzorder

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 Crayzorder
Member since 2010 • 510 Posts

Battlefield hands down. MW has good graphics and all, but BC's measure passed it.

Avatar image for jad206
jad206

1821

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 jad206
Member since 2009 • 1821 Posts

Battlefield no doubt.

Avatar image for EXLINK
EXLINK

5719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 EXLINK
Member since 2003 • 5719 Posts
MW2 has better gun models but that's about it.
Avatar image for DJSAV_101
DJSAV_101

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 DJSAV_101
Member since 2008 • 3701 Posts

MW2 has better graphics and runs smoother but I still prefer BC2 multiplayer.

Avatar image for qbell
qbell

1035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 qbell
Member since 2006 • 1035 Posts

i'd say bf because it has trees and stuff....lol nah but really sometimes when im chilling in the woods or jungle with the surround sound on its an epic experience all round.

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

i tried both out.. battefield is a very pretty game. the snow level. the jungle, the desert. i would say the graphics are better on battefield.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#20 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
To me it looked like Modern Warfare 2 had better looking character models and hud graphics(hands and guns). I thought Bad Company 2's environment and scale were more impressive.