This topic is locked from further discussion.
If your going to say something like this.. youmay as well say
"God of War coming to 360!?"
Which would for 1) Be a heck of a lot cooler then killzone...
But either way... Neither game is coming to the 360 since both are made/developed by SCEA.Â
it would be cool even though we don't need it. We have MASTER CHEIF!!!!!!!!!!!IAMGOODICECREAMNo, it wouldn't.
So many names on this thread are gonna be used to admit self-ownage....to say this game is gonna suck without seeing or playin it is self-ownage...
Killzone 1 wasn't as great a game cuz it was limited by very dated technology...Killzone 2 is on the side of newer technology...that being said...Halo's biggest win was what could be done onscreen....as it was Killzone 1's biggest downfall...not the case this time around. Actually quite the opposite...honestly I'd luv to see KZ2 on 360 though it won't be technologically possible...same with resistance....50 gig KZ2 = TEH SLOPPY UBER COMPRESSION FROM TEH HELLZORS...Resistance just has too many particle effects and enemies onscreen at once...not IMPOSSIBLE for 360 but highly unlikely atm given devs knowledge of 360...come back in a year...
So many names on this thread are gonna be used to admit self-ownage....to say this game is gonna suck without seeing or playin it is self-ownage...
Killzone 1 wasn't as great a game cuz it was limited by very dated technology...Killzone 2 is on the side of newer technology...that being said...Halo's biggest win was what could be done onscreen....as it was Killzone 1's biggest downfall...not the case this time around. Actually quite the opposite...honestly I'd luv to see KZ2 on 360 though it won't be technologically possible...same with resistance....50 gig KZ2 = TEH SLOPPY UBER COMPRESSION FROM TEH HELLZORS...Resistance just has too many particle effects and enemies onscreen at once...not IMPOSSIBLE for 360 but highly unlikely atm given devs knowledge of 360...come back in a year...
Hikaru-119
 I am having difficulties trying to understand what you are saying...
Are you saying that because the game was on a PS2 that is why it isn't good?
That would mean that God of War, God of War 2, Okami, or any final fantasy on the PS2 is bad because it's on dated technology?
Killzone sucked because the controls were terrible, the gameplay was dull and wasn't all that fascinating, the mutliplayer sucked, and it just wasn't that fun.
Saying the only reason why halo was better is the graphics or "What it could do onscreen" is just ignorant.
The first Halo was VERY dated and still beat Killzone by miles... It was an Xbox launch title, so you can't get more dated then that in the xbox generation. Â
[QUOTE="Hikaru-119"]So many names on this thread are gonna be used to admit self-ownage....to say this game is gonna suck without seeing or playin it is self-ownage...
Killzone 1 wasn't as great a game cuz it was limited by very dated technology...Killzone 2 is on the side of newer technology...that being said...Halo's biggest win was what could be done onscreen....as it was Killzone 1's biggest downfall...not the case this time around. Actually quite the opposite...honestly I'd luv to see KZ2 on 360 though it won't be technologically possible...same with resistance....50 gig KZ2 = TEH SLOPPY UBER COMPRESSION FROM TEH HELLZORS...Resistance just has too many particle effects and enemies onscreen at once...not IMPOSSIBLE for 360 but highly unlikely atm given devs knowledge of 360...come back in a year...
Bigfoot_Slayer
I am having difficulties trying to understand what you are saying...
Are you saying that because the game was on a PS2 that is why it isn't good?
That would mean that God of War, God of War 2, Okami, or any final fantasy on the PS2 is bad because it's on dated technology?
Killzone sucked because the controls were terrible, the gameplay was dull and wasn't all that fascinating, the mutliplayer sucked, and it just wasn't that fun.
Saying the only reason why halo was better is the graphics or "What it could do onscreen" is just ignorant.
The first Halo was VERY dated and still beat Killzone by miles... It was an Xbox launch title, so you can't get more dated then that in the xbox generation.
Killzone 1 was built on technology that was dated....the controls weren't refined and though the game had potential...it never broke any barriers...this time around the tables have changed a tad bit though. Killzone 2 has a 20 million dollar budget and 120 man team making it (most expensive and largest dedicated to final product team ever)...I just think people are getting ahead of themselves talkin smack about a game that will probably dwarf Halo 3 and possibly Crysis given what we've seen of both and only knowing that Killzone can use up to 50 gig Discs. My opinion though..So many names on this thread are gonna be used to admit self-ownage....to say this game is gonna suck without seeing or playin it is self-ownage...
Killzone 1 wasn't as great a game cuz it was limited by very dated technology...Killzone 2 is on the side of newer technology...that being said...Halo's biggest win was what could be done onscreen....as it was Killzone 1's biggest downfall...not the case this time around. Actually quite the opposite...honestly I'd luv to see KZ2 on 360 though it won't be technologically possible...same with resistance....50 gig KZ2 = TEH SLOPPY UBER COMPRESSION FROM TEH HELLZORS...Resistance just has too many particle effects and enemies onscreen at once...not IMPOSSIBLE for 360 but highly unlikely atm given devs knowledge of 360...come back in a year...
Hikaru-119
Lol, Gears makes anything else out right now look poor in comparison.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment