What is considered a decent Gamerscore?

OVER 9000!!!!

i'm on a measley 5000. i don't play games often enough to compete with some of the other gamerscores people have.

at lest over 5000 but im really not into gamerscore i just care about having fun.

Well, if you're completely new a couple thousand is fine. Gamerscore is a completely pointless number anyway except for bragging rights with friends. 10,000 seems to be a good number that separates a lot of people and seems "respectable" in my opinion. That is, unless you played Avatar, because if you do there is no chance of ever being respectable.

I guess 20k is a decent chunk even though I don't really pay attention to it.

at lest over 5000 but im really not into gamerscore i just care about having fun.

DarkRikuShadow

I Would say anything over 25.

It depends how long you have had a 360 but for people that got it around launch I would say about 50k. Unless they rarely play it even without trying they should be over 50k.

i think most people don't even care... so it's kind of difficult to determine if a score is decent or not.

It depends how long you have had a 360 but for people that got it around launch I would say about 50k. Unless they rarely play it even without trying they should be over 50k.

Darkslayer16

For the people that actually care about gamerscore, I'd say like 15,000+ maybe. If you don't care, then it doesn't matter. For me, I don't care one bit. :P

It depends how long you have had your 360 for and weither or not you TRY to get achievments or if you just game and let the points come as they do, without looking at what the achivements are before.

i would say that depends on how many games uve played. if u have 100 played games and a 10k gamerscore. thats uber lame. ill say a decent gamerscore should be at least 50% of the total points of all ur played games.. like if u have 10 played games. a decent gamerscore should be 5000g

I only have 8000, the majority of my friends have around 5000-7000.

I'm sure everyone thinks differently when it comes to having decent gamerscore, so really it's all just in your opinion what a decent gamerscore would be.

Gamerscore just shows how much time you devote togames. Above 25,000 or so and you're closing in on agoraphobia.

Gamerscore just shows how much time you devote togames. Above 25,000 or so and you're closing in on agoraphobia.

seankane

It was a slight exaggeration, but the premise is right. If your gamerscore is getting that high, you probably play a little too much(in my opinion, of course).

15k+ is pretty "good"... Just have fun, that's what matters.

It was a slight exaggeration, but the premise is right. If your gamerscore is getting that high, you probably play a little too much(in my opinion, of course).

seankane

[QUOTE="seankane"]

It was a slight exaggeration, but the premise is right. If your gamerscore is getting that high, you probably play a little too much(in my opinion, of course).

chaoscougar1

I dont think 'half' the people on this site have gamerscores of 25,000 or more. And if they do, and they're offended then oh well. I'm not going to take back what I honestly think.

And saying 'in my opinion' is only my way of covering in-case somebody wanted to get into a war of what is or isn't too long. Too many people assume that without those words, you are trying to impose 'truths' on them or something. Basically, I'm trying to save time of going through the pointless parts of an argument.

But please, explain to me whats ignorant about my comments. You keep saying it, but you've done absolutely nothing to show it.

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="seankane"]

It was a slight exaggeration, but the premise is right. If your gamerscore is getting that high, you probably play a little too much(in my opinion, of course).

seankane

I dont think 'half' the people on this site have gamerscores of 25,000 or more. And if they do, and they're offended then oh well. I'm not going to take back what I honestly think.

And saying 'in my opinion' is only my way of covering in-case somebody wanted to get into a war of what is or isn't too long. Too many people assume that without those words, you are trying to impose 'truths' on them or something. Basically, I'm trying to save time of going through the pointless parts of an argument.

But please, explain to me whats ignorant about my comments. You keep saying it, but you've done absolutely nothing to show it.

I have about 14,000 and have had a 360 for just under 3 years.

But that's actually very low it would seem for the time.

I guess I tend to not really go for achievements that much. Seems some aim for the full thousand on every game they buy.

i think most people don't even care... so it's kind of difficult to determine if a score is decent or not.

a55a55inx

I have to go with this.

Gamerscore just shows how much time you devote togames. Above 25,000 or so and you're closing in on agoraphobia.

seankane

on a gaming forum, you called all people with over 25,000 gamerscore 'agoraphobic,' what isnt ignorant about that? first of all your saying this ON A GAMING FORUM. Secondly your generalising a large population based on an irrelevant number. Thirdly, your not taking into considertion how long they have actually had their console. Fourth; 25,000 gamerscore is not a lot considering over 150,000 people have reached that milestone. Finally; you decided to label those 150,000+ persons as agoraphobic, having absolutely no clue who they are. show enough ignorance for you?

chaoscougar1

Ok, well I've already addressed the fact that my 'agoraphobic' comment was a purposeful exaggeration. You will continue to use it, I know, because its your best(and only) weapon, but do try and get on with the conversation instead of dwelling on already explained comments, will ya?

Anyways, it doesn't matter that 150,000 people have reached that same 'milestone', because itsquite likelythat there's at least 150,000 people out there who play video games a littletoo much, wouldn't you say?

And how is the fact that this is a gaming forum any kind of evidence of ignorance? Thats a strange one.

[QUOTE="seankane"]

Gamerscore just shows how much time you devote togames. Above 25,000 or so and you're closing in on agoraphobia.

DPhunkT

I see you have SIXTY EIGHT games with a completion percentage of 72%. I dont think the Xbox360 has been out long enough to make that kind of statistic reasonable. Sounds like you play video games a little too much, if you ask me.

I mean, I think that I play games too much as it is. Not that my gamerscore reflects it(since I dont go for acheivements), but I do put in quite a bit of playing, and I certainly wouldn't ever come close to your guy's score even if I did go for acheivements.

Really, I probably shouldn't be saying to people that I think they're playing games too much, I can admit that. Its none of my business. Perhaps I'm just jealous that I CANT play video games as much as you guys do.

Is that fair enough?

Really, I probably shouldn't be saying to people that I think they're playing games too much, I can admit that. Its none of my business. Perhaps I'm just jealous that I CANT play video games as much as you guys do.

Is that fair enough?

seankane

I didn't 'take back' anything. I still stand by my position that gamers with scores over 25,000 probably play games a little too much.

All I'm conceding is that its probably a bit much to go and preach to people how they should be spending their time, which was never my intent, but which I was cornered into doing.

i have had my 360 for 7 and a half months......... and i only have 2,000 gamerscore.

i dont really aim to get achivments so when i get them it is like a surprirse

I'd say zero. i mean seriously - who gives a **** gamerscore doesn't mean a thing.

I only have 3 360 games so far: Soul Calibur IV, Kung Fu Panda (came with it so I played it a bit; it's not bad) and Assassin's Creed and I haven't played Assassin's Creed yet. A lot of the games I wanna play are regular XBox games and they don't give achievements.