topic/ poll ^^^please dont just vote...post what u picked and why
i picked the pistol cause it with would be awesome slicing some ones arms off with a pistol whip motion
This topic is locked from further discussion.
topic/ poll ^^^please dont just vote...post what u picked and why
i picked the pistol cause it with would be awesome slicing some ones arms off with a pistol whip motion
I think it should stay the same, and keep the chainsaw on the Lancer.
Having said that though... a chainsaw bayonette on a shotgun would be the ultimate close quarters weapon.
I think it should be on the Snipe because with the lancer, if you get in close quarters battle, you still have a gun that shoots off rounds rapidly. With the snipe, if someone comes up on you and all u have is the snipe, your screwed if you can melee. jchaffI think the balancer for the sniper's melee is its reach. That's part of the reason I used it for melee so much, besides the hammerburst, course.
I think I like it on the chainsaw. It seems like a cool idea to fight without limbs after a chainsaw slice, but what's the point in the game? Every weapon thus far has a strength and a weakness. Without one of each, it's just adding to aesthetics, something this game is rich with already.BranKetra
What a idiot.
id like the sniper to have a 10 foot chainsaw bayonet so i can get ppl through walls :):)00173
i think your talking about this....
i call it....the punisher
how about some new weapons. Like, some kind of medium sniper (a scoped hammerburst with less scope basically), a minigun or heavy machine gun, a grenade launcher, some kind of energy weapon (plasma gun), a dedicatedclose combat weapon, and maybe some kind of mine layer ortrip wire... basicaly something to set explosive traps with if placed right. The weapons they havenow are fine, and at leastbalanced. Stuff like a chainsaw shotgun on theother hand would betoo ridiculously overpowered.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment