yeah they are pretty different games, if you want a free roam shooter with cool fire propagation then get Far Cry 2. if you want a uniuqe adventure with a good story the nget Prince of Persia
depends on what you're looking for in a game my friend...LessThanMike
y 2 gamertags? ne way i have not played prince of persia so i would have to say get that. Far Cry 2 is very repetitive and boring and i usually like almost every game i play that involves shooting things.
how i see it u get more play t5ime with farcry has online and price..... dont then farcry as map edior you put some hours into that then the story is supose to be like 30 hours long. price.... sounds like a one play runthrough and done with it i would spend that 60 bucks on gamefly
The first 2 hours of Far Cry 2 is boring. But once you unlock the Southern Territory the game starts to get really good, so I'd have to go with Far Cry 2.
The first 2 hours of Far Cry 2 is boring. But once you unlock the Southern Territory the game starts to get really good, so I'd have to go with Far Cry 2.KA12NAG3
I thought the start was boring too, almost stopped playing it but it does pick up after a while.
your question doesn't make sense. one game is a first-person shooter the other is a third person platform action game. you are on the gamespot website how about you take advantage ot the search function and read some reviews. hmmmm?
well ima have to say prince of persia, havent played it, but i am currently stuck on far cry 2 with no possible way of moving further in the game (only at 69%)
Log in to comment