This topic is locked from further discussion.
If you have live then i would definately go with rainbow six vegas ALL THE WAY.. its an excellent game with more tacticalness than gears but less than graw2... it fits right in, if you dont have live but usually just system link-local game... then i would go with Call Of Duty 2... Call of duty three isnt worth the extra 20 you have to spend to get it.
I am going to pick up a shooter a bit later and I was wondering which one I should get. I AM BUYING FOR MULTIPLAYER mostly but a good Campaign would be nice to have. I already have Gears. I dont want GRAW either.chester706cod3 sounds like it'll do the trick. it has a pretty good single player and incredible online. i can sit down and play cod3 ranked matches online all night without blinking, where as gears, i just get pissed and tired of and can't take very long of. seriously, cod3 is really good.
I have Halo 2. I am severely torn between COD3 and RB6 Vegas. They both look so fun! chester706call of duty 3. campaign is kinda lame but multi player makes up for it ten fold.
Vegas ATW 8)
I dont know about you but im getting it next week, i played the multiplayer demo and its mind blowin fun remind me of the old school great multiplayers like goldeneye 64, 007 nightfire, halo 2. but this game has kick a!# graphics, great controls and one insanely wicked arsenal of weapon to choose from. :)
I'm so pissed with myself about not getting this game earlier :evil:
I am going to pick up a shooter a bit later and I was wondering which one I should get. I AM BUYING FOR MULTIPLAYER mostly but a good Campaign would be nice to have. I already have Gears. I dont want GRAW either.chester706
For multi-player the best game to me is Battlefield 2: Modern Combat, but the campaign(single-player) sucks even though it has the really cool "hotswapping" feature.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment