like musicc videos ? wtf,
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Because people will still buy them for some reason.
Shrapnel99
that and technically its against the law to give them out for free (i.e. i believe you have to pay for this stuff at itunes too)
And on youtube, it's legal because the company themselves put it up.
So on xbl the companeis in a way force microsoft to make users pay for them.
Hopefully all realize youtube and mtv!
lol, Yes there is that too, seen the other day someone was not happy when they downloaded a red v blue session and not all the eps where there. I dont see the point as it's been on the web for free for what 4 years now.Because people will still buy them for some reason.
Shrapnel99
If the music videos were free most of them would be from artists you have never even heard of who are trying to get some free publicity.
[QUOTE="Shrapnel99"]
Because people will still buy them for some reason.
daprofesa
that and technically its against the law to give them out for free (i.e. i believe you have to pay for this stuff at itunes too)
And on youtube, it's legal because the company themselves put it up.
So on xbl the companeis in a way force microsoft to make users pay for them.
Hopefully all realize youtube and mtv!
mtv still plays music? I thought they had reduced to nothing more than horribly staged reality crap.
you are totally right face it the Xbox 360 has soooo much to offer and as long as there are "REAL" gamers then they will buy that stuf things like xbox live gold and the wireless network adapter there you have it case closed.Because people will still buy them for some reason.
Shrapnel99
I don't understand why Microsoft charges money for the COD map packs if they are free on the PC version... that just makes no sense.fighter91Because Bill Gates only cares about money, that's why google's beating microsoft in the webapps department... they don't charge for anything because all of google's money comes from ads while microsoft feels it should not only put 10 ads on a page but charge you for their service as well (Oh yea cause I really need to pay for hotmail premium). So it only makes sense that they'd do the same thing for xbl.
I don't understand why Microsoft charges money for the COD map packs if they are free on the PC version... that just makes no sense.fighter91
Microsoft doesn't charge for the Map packs, its the developer who does it. The reason why they are free on PC is because the PC map pack was sponsored by some graphics card company.
I know how you feel, i mean we pay to dollar for the xbox live gold and yet they also wnat us to pay for other stuff as well. It's just the way they are.
As far as music is concerned... Microsoft has to buy the license for the music... and they are selling the music through the music producer... So Microsoft is only getting a portion of the money, most of which is going to the music production company...
Same with Movies and DLC... the film companies and game developement companies are recieving most of the money through the sales, Microsoft just gets a portion of it...
[QUOTE="fighter91"]I don't understand why Microsoft charges money for the COD map packs if they are free on the PC version... that just makes no sense.Johnnylaw47Because Bill Gates only cares about money, that's why google's beating microsoft in the webapps department... they don't charge for anything because all of google's money comes from ads while microsoft feels it should not only put 10 ads on a page but charge you for their service as well (Oh yea cause I really need to pay for hotmail premium). So it only makes sense that they'd do the same thing for xbl. Bill Gates hasn't worked for Microsoft for quite a while now. He's been retired for several years. All he does anymore is give to charity.
[QUOTE="fighter91"]I don't understand why Microsoft charges money for the COD map packs if they are free on the PC version... that just makes no sense.MrSlippery39
Microsoft doesn't charge for the Map packs, its the developer who does it. The reason why they are free on PC is because the PC map pack was sponsored by some graphics card company.
Microsoft sets the price for all DLC and Arcade games. This is why some of it is free and some if it is not. Generally speaking, if there's achievements related to it, then there's a charge for it. Of course there are several exceptions to this rule. Examples of this would be the extra stages for Army of Two. Those were free because of a Pontiac promotion. There's an Arcade space shooter (like Gradius from SNES back in the day) that is free, with achievements, because it was developed by 3 interns at a university. I know this because I read a short interview with one of the managers at Stainless Games (they recently launched Magic on XBL) and he said they thought Microsoft was going to require 1,200 MS points ($15 for the game) but instead it's being sold for 800 MS points.Why do some people still not realize it's a business? It's not just Microsoft. Any company would do this. For reasons that a good number of people have already explained on here they have to. You know what you're getting yourself into when you sign up for XBL...so don't complain when things arise such as trying to watch copyrighted (key word) music videos!boltzcomBecause you're always going to run into people that want something for nothing and the moment they're denied that, they start complaining. It's like complaining about gas prices. Does it accomplish anything? Nope.
Because most things are produced at a cost and so the developers need to make back some of this cost, if you watched the E3 conference we will be getting quite a lot free for example the personalised radio stations and facebook. Dont complain about paying stuff because if you realli want something you should just go out and buy it.
Why do some people still not realize it's a business? It's not just Microsoft. Any company would do this. For reasons that a good number of people have already explained on here they have to. You know what you're getting yourself into when you sign up for XBL...so don't complain when things arise such as trying to watch copyrighted (key word) music videos!boltzcom
Because they are little kids that don't have to worry about money... They ask mommy and she says no... so they go into little kid rage pouting and make threads like this...
I think he meant things like to play online because the PS3 and Wii has free internet play. Also if Red Vs. Blue is free online then why not on the Xbox? However I do not waste money on such useless crap like videos and movies on the Xbox while I can rent it using blockbuster or download it in iTunes. When you but things on the Xbox, your limited to the Xbox.Dude, you're right! Why should they charge us for music videos? Why should they charge for movies? WHY SHOULD THEY CHARGE FOR GAMES?! (All sarcasm)
I also wonder why people like you waste space on the forums with these types of questions. (Not sarcasm)
P.S. If you really want your music videos that bad, there is a magical (yes, magical) website called Youtube!
xRmRxfreakBOMB
[QUOTE="boltzcom"]Why do some people still not realize it's a business? It's not just Microsoft. Any company would do this. For reasons that a good number of people have already explained on here they have to. You know what you're getting yourself into when you sign up for XBL...so don't complain when things arise such as trying to watch copyrighted (key word) music videos!Squeets
Because they are little kids that don't have to worry about money... They ask mommy and she says no... so they go into little kid rage pouting and make threads like this...
You just made my day. :lol:I don't understand why Microsoft charges money for the COD map packs if they are free on the PC version... that just makes no sense.fighter91games are also cheaper on pc, but when you have a gaming pc it can cost a lot of money to upgrade it.
I love how some of you have decided in your minds what should and should not be free.
The problem is that none of you have any good justifications for WHY these things should be free. And I'm not talking about a quick, one-line response, I'm talking an actual analysis on the product, its supply/demand and its potential market and whatnot. Ya know, stuff that these professionals do to determine these things?
Its very easy to say, "Oh but Microsoft isa huge, rich corporation and can afford to give away this for free." Well sure they can, yes. But does that mean they should? I'm sure they could afford to buy me a Ferrari without it denting their business in the least, but I certainly dont expect them to do that. Microsoft is not a charity. They(and the stockholders)invest their money, and they expect a return from it. Thats how business works.
Only thing I really hate paying for are gamerpics.brandontwbThen don't. Are gamerpics 100% essential for gaming? No. Does your Xbox 360 come with some? Yes. Problem solved, huh?
To TC: Do you walk into Wal-Mart and complain about all the products on the shelves not being free? Well, maybe you do but those of us that understand commerce don't. It's there if you want to purchase it,if you don't then just walk away.
[QUOTE="MrSlippery39"][QUOTE="fighter91"]I don't understand why Microsoft charges money for the COD map packs if they are free on the PC version... that just makes no sense.Lance_Kalzas
Microsoft doesn't charge for the Map packs, its the developer who does it. The reason why they are free on PC is because the PC map pack was sponsored by some graphics card company.
Microsoft sets the price for all DLC and Arcade games. This is why some of it is free and some if it is not. Generally speaking, if there's achievements related to it, then there's a charge for it. Of course there are several exceptions to this rule. Examples of this would be the extra stages for Army of Two. Those were free because of a Pontiac promotion. There's an Arcade space shooter (like Gradius from SNES back in the day) that is free, with achievements, because it was developed by 3 interns at a university. I know this because I read a short interview with one of the managers at Stainless Games (they recently launched Magic on XBL) and he said they thought Microsoft was going to require 1,200 MS points ($15 for the game) but instead it's being sold for 800 MS points. Nope your still wrong. Bill Gates hasn't worked for microsoft in quite awhile but his money grubbing partners are still there. And if you want to use the "it's a business" excuse because either you don't buy the DLC or arcade games and thus dont care, or for some other reason than please explain why microsofts first DLC was a horse armor for oblivion that cost $5? Can you tell me any reason why horse armor warrants $5 of anyone's money?[QUOTE="brandontwb"]Only thing I really hate paying for are gamerpics.Lance_KalzasThen don't. Are gamerpics 100% essential for gaming? No. Does your Xbox 360 come with some? Yes. Problem solved, huh? Heck, some games such as Gears of War 2 and Halo Wars give them to you for free just for completing certain in game objectives.
[QUOTE="Lance_Kalzas"][QUOTE="MrSlippery39"]Microsoft sets the price for all DLC and Arcade games. This is why some of it is free and some if it is not. Generally speaking, if there's achievements related to it, then there's a charge for it. Of course there are several exceptions to this rule. Examples of this would be the extra stages for Army of Two. Those were free because of a Pontiac promotion. There's an Arcade space shooter (like Gradius from SNES back in the day) that is free, with achievements, because it was developed by 3 interns at a university. I know this because I read a short interview with one of the managers at Stainless Games (they recently launched Magic on XBL) and he said they thought Microsoft was going to require 1,200 MS points ($15 for the game) but instead it's being sold for 800 MS points.Microsoft doesn't charge for the Map packs, its the developer who does it. The reason why they are free on PC is because the PC map pack was sponsored by some graphics card company.
Johnnylaw47
Nope your still wrong. Bill Gates hasn't worked for microsoft in quite awhile but his money grubbing partners are still there. And if you want to use the "it's a business" excuse because either you don't buy the DLC or arcade games and thus dont care, or for some other reason than please explain why microsofts first DLC was a horse armor for oblivion that cost $5? Can you tell me any reason why horse armor warrants $5 of anyone's money?
No, I'm not wrong. I didn't refer to Horse Armor in particular. I said "Generally speaking...." That means I'm not referring to any particular item plus I listed a few examples in my original post that show the opposite of what you're saying. Did you latch on to the 2nd sentence in my post and ignore the rest?
How you know it's MS putting a price on them? If you have notice, record companies don't like giving away anything for free. And they like to sue.like musicc videos ? wtf,
Merc009
I'm pretty sure it's not Microsoft slapping on the price tag. They get their cut from your live subscription and that's probably it. All other DLC money probably goes to publishers/developers....I don't know why people think that Microsoft or anyone else who tries to make money is evil....lol
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment