of course I would. It looks like an amazing game and even if they only included like 5 minutes of gameplay I'd still get it. can't wait for 11/10/09!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Why would you pay to play a demo? That defeats the purpose of a demo IMO.BlobstoneHey, it's just a question. i'm interested to see how many ppl would do it. I voted no. Maybe if it was something like The Old Republic which I am really interested in and is probably not going to be released until 2011. But for something that should be out in a few months, I'm patient enough to wait.
There are better games (IMO of course) coming out this year that I am more interested in. My bro will be buying this game, so I will play it a bit, but this is Activision we are talking about here. You tell them you want to pay $10 for a demo, they will do it. They like money... a lot. Day 1 dlc, too. Really is a bummer.
even if they only included like 5 minutes of gameplay
Blobstone
No way, no how. Especially if it was only 5 minutes of gameplay!
Actually, try the DLC that is going to be released on day 1.No way because a couple weeks later your gonna have to buy the game for like $70 plus your $10 for demo that your never gonna play again. Better save the $10 for DLC that is sure to follow within a month.
93soccer
[QUOTE="93soccer"]Actually, try the DLC that is going to be released on day 1.No way because a couple weeks later your gonna have to buy the game for like $70 plus your $10 for demo that your never gonna play again. Better save the $10 for DLC that is sure to follow within a month.
UnamedThing
Exactly.
Demo is short for demonstration. Why should I pay a developer $10 to demonstrate the gameplay that will already be included in a game that is already gonna cost $60+. That just fuels other companies to attempt to get away with squeezing as much money from a game as they can. It takes no work, effort or extra money to create a demo. Well it may cost them a few bucks, but that's the point. Demos are created to get people interested in a game, it's a marketing tool and a form of advertisement in the video game world.
Consumers should never ever pay to see/play an advertisement! That is the most stupid thingI have ever heard suggestedsuggested! (besides bailing out AIG)
LMAO, you can't be serious with this thread. The purpose of the demo is to give people the chance to see how that game is before it actually comes out. Thats like paying to go to E3 and paying $10 to play ever demo game on the floor. It makes no sense.
That's the worst idea I've ever heard...wwervin
Agreed. I wouldn't do it even with a gun to my face. Worst idea ever, really.
They start that and everyone else will do it too ~Sassy-Cc
This being one of the reasons.
[QUOTE="wwervin"]That's the worst idea I've ever heard...Tom_delonge555
Agreed. I wouldn't do it even with a gun to my face. Worst idea ever, really.
They start that and everyone else will do it too ~Sassy-Cc
This being one of the reasons.
Yes, but it's just a demo so who cares if everyone does it? It doesn't change the fact that you still won't be able to buy it until the release date....so if some are willing to shell out $10 clams to preview a sample, what's the harm? It isn't offering an advantage, it just wets the appetite and will create an even bigger market with message board buzz. Maybe it would even give the creators a chance to streamline the gameplay based on reviews of those who sample it.No I wouldn't pay for a demo. Just waste of money. Rather wait to spend my money on the full retail version.
I would just wait for the intense CoD fanboys to get a hold of it and then see what they had to say about the demo, I have patience.
[QUOTE="Tom_delonge555"][QUOTE="wwervin"]
Agreed. I wouldn't do it even with a gun to my face. Worst idea ever, really.
[QUOTE="Sassy-Cc"]They start that and everyone else will do it too ~MrD3PO
This being one of the reasons.
Yes, but it's just a demo so who cares if everyone does it? It doesn't change the fact that you still won't be able to buy it until the release date....so if some are willing to shell out $10 clams to preview a sample, what's the harm? It isn't offering an advantage, it just wets the appetite and will create an even bigger market with message board buzz. Maybe it would even give the creators a chance to streamline the gameplay based on reviews of those who sample it.You are still missing the point. Did you even read my comment above re what is a demo???????
Also about streamlining the gameplay, lol, once a demo comes out, the discs are already being printed and the game is finalized--expect for updates, dlc, etc. People can already sample it and do reviews of demos if the demo is free. How does charging for a demo change this.
Lastly, it wouldn't be in a company's best interest to charge for a demo. Less people would purchase the demo and less people would get a chance to get interested in the game. However, I can see how a game like COD wouldn't matter where millions of people already plan to purchase the game, but regardless, there would be no benefit but getting 10 bucks for the suckers that payed for a demo. And I still don't see how paying wets someones appetite, when I get get it for free and have that wet my appetite. You logic has no sense.......
Yes, but it's just a demo so who cares if everyone does it? It doesn't change the fact that you still won't be able to buy it until the release date....so if some are willing to shell out $10 clams to preview a sample, what's the harm? It isn't offering an advantage, it just wets the appetite and will create an even bigger market with message board buzz. Maybe it would even give the creators a chance to streamline the gameplay based on reviews of those who sample it.[QUOTE="MrD3PO"][QUOTE="Tom_delonge555"]
This being one of the reasons.
joke_man
You are still missing the point. Did you even read my comment above re what is a demo???????
Also about streamlining the gameplay, lol, once a demo comes out, the discs are already being printed and the game is finalized--expect for updates, dlc, etc. People can already sample it and do reviews of demos if the demo is free. How does charging for a demo change this.
Lastly, it wouldn't be in a company's best interest to charge for a demo. Less people would purchase the demo and less people would get a chance to get interested in the game. However, I can see how a game like COD wouldn't matter where millions of people already plan to purchase the game, but regardless, there would be no benefit but getting 10 bucks for the suckers that payed for a demo. And I still don't see how paying wets someones appetite, when I get get it for free and have that wet my appetite. You logic has no sense.......
Yes, I agree with you, but you quoted the whole thing insanally wrong and made it look like I was the one who wrote all that nonsense that you just shut down about streamlining the gameplay, wetting someones appetite and so on. Besides that huge misunderstanding, I couldn't agree more with you. I didn't even bother replying to him because what he wrote made no sense at all. It COMPLETELY defeats the purpose of a demo in every way possible. The OP created the thread out of curiosity, not bc he acctually backs the ideia (based on what he wrote that's what I concluded at least) but it's ridiculous (and a little sad) that there are people supporting that same ideia. Anyway, a demo is like advertising. It tries to convince someone to spend money on a product. If you have to pay for it, then it completely defeats its original intent. So, this short sentence should keep anyone, even the craziest ones, from posting on favor of paying for demos again.[QUOTE="93soccer"]Actually, try the DLC that is going to be released on day 1. Can you please find anywhere that says that?No way because a couple weeks later your gonna have to buy the game for like $70 plus your $10 for demo that your never gonna play again. Better save the $10 for DLC that is sure to follow within a month.
UnamedThing
[QUOTE="joke_man"][QUOTE="MrD3PO"] Yes, but it's just a demo so who cares if everyone does it? It doesn't change the fact that you still won't be able to buy it until the release date....so if some are willing to shell out $10 clams to preview a sample, what's the harm? It isn't offering an advantage, it just wets the appetite and will create an even bigger market with message board buzz. Maybe it would even give the creators a chance to streamline the gameplay based on reviews of those who sample it.Tom_delonge555
You are still missing the point. Did you even read my comment above re what is a demo???????
Also about streamlining the gameplay, lol, once a demo comes out, the discs are already being printed and the game is finalized--expect for updates, dlc, etc. People can already sample it and do reviews of demos if the demo is free. How does charging for a demo change this.
Lastly, it wouldn't be in a company's best interest to charge for a demo. Less people would purchase the demo and less people would get a chance to get interested in the game. However, I can see how a game like COD wouldn't matter where millions of people already plan to purchase the game, but regardless, there would be no benefit but getting 10 bucks for the suckers that payed for a demo. And I still don't see how paying wets someones appetite, when I get get it for free and have that wet my appetite. You logic has no sense.......
Yes, I agree with you, but you quoted the whole thing insanally wrong and made it look like I was the one who wrote all that nonsense that you just shut down about streamlining the gameplay, wetting someones appetite and so on. Besides that huge misunderstanding, I couldn't agree more with you. I didn't even bother replying to him because what he wrote made no sense at all. It COMPLETELY defeats the purpose of a demo in every way possible. The OP created the thread out of curiosity, not bc he acctually backs the ideia (based on what he wrote that's what I concluded at least) but it's ridiculous (and a little sad) that there are people supporting that same ideia. Anyway, a demo is like advertising. It tries to convince someone to spend money on a product. If you have to pay for it, then it completely defeats its original intent. So, this short sentence should keep anyone, even the craziest ones, from posting on favor of paying for demos again.Sorry for the misunderstanding Tom. I was actually quoting MrD3PO, not you. The quoting thing can be a little bit confusing and easily misconstrue a quoter's or quotee's idea(s). MrD3PO actually quoted you and I followed by quoting him, thus it was all "above" as I stated.
Thanks for agreeing, and to everybody out there, don't be stupid.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment