Wow....Frontlines is terrible compared to CoD4

F: FoW is terrible! I rented it just about 3 hours ago and i've already returned it. It's the worst online multiplayer game i've ever played. It seriously is terrible. Why would people like this game? Yeah, it has dedicated servers and 32 player MP but still, the gameplay and graphics are beyond horrible.

CoD4 owns all the way.

This game is no COD4 but its a great game all in its own. each game has its different features, i have both, all it needs to be is fun, and thats what really matters.

I think once Battlefield Bad Company comes out, Frontlines will be a distant memory.

F: FoW is terrible! I rented it just about 3 hours ago and i've already returned it. It's the worst online multiplayer game i've ever played. It seriously is terrible. Why would people like this game? Yeah, it has dedicated servers and 32 player MP but still, the gameplay and graphics are beyond horrible.

CoD4 owns all the way.

Zeldaguy16

I only played the demos (campaign and online). I did not like the campaign one at all and I thought the multiplayer was kind of boring, but that was because it was 3 vs 3 on some HUGE map and I didn't know where anyone was the whole time.

I think it is a little unfair to compare the two, even though they are both in the FPS genre. Yes CoD4 graphics are WAY better, but the gameplay varies in multiplayer sense. Frontlines is all about the big maps, vehicules and all out war with large teams, where CoD4 tries to be a little bit mroe tactical or a complete bloodfest (depending on the gametype).

As for singleplayer I would agree Frontlines seems much weaker then CoD4's and does not provide nearly the same intense-action packed excitment that CoD4 provides with its stellar single player.

To all of those who are saying why are you comparing the two they aren't even the same.....that really isn't true. They are IN THE SAME GENRE, but they are trying to do two different things, however still have a lot of the same elements and when you comapre those same elements COD4 just takes the cake.

F: FoW is terrible! I rented it just about 3 hours ago and i've already returned it. It's the worst online multiplayer game i've ever played. It seriously is terrible. Why would people like this game? Yeah, it has dedicated servers and 32 player MP but still, the gameplay and graphics are beyond horrible.

CoD4 owns all the way.

Zeldaguy16

I only played the demos (campaign and online). I did not like the campaign one at all and I thought the multiplayer was kind of boring, but that was because it was 3 vs 3 on some HUGE map and I didn't know where anyone was the whole time.

I think it is a little unfair to compare the two, even though they are both in the FPS genre. Yes CoD4 graphics are WAY better, but the gameplay varies in multiplayer sense. Frontlines is all about the big maps, vehicules and all out war with large teams, where CoD4 tries to be a little bit mroe tactical or a complete bloodfest (depending on the gametype).

As for singleplayer I would agree Frontlines seems much weaker then CoD4's and does not provide nearly the same intense-action packed excitment that CoD4 provides with its stellar single player.

To all of those who are saying why are you comparing the two they aren't even the same.....that really isn't true. They are IN THE SAME GENRE, but they are trying to do two different things, however still have a lot of the same elements and when you comapre those same elements COD4 just takes the cake.