For once I agree with the gamespot reviews. Halo was a great series for the time it did a great job in gameplay and maybe was a little over rated (think about it halo 1,2,and 3 players and compare it to some other games from back then). But Bungie is done with their masterpiece, the saga is over. And now other companies are trying to save their quarterly loses with borrowing the name. The fact is for a RTS halo wars fails. Two major factions is all? that means to styles of play and the specials for most units are all similar mass destruction. Wow, so much strategy, and upgrades are unreasonable let me put it this was in the 3 games I played I upgraded marines to OTS highest level and they took 4 convent wraiths. WTF. That is just plain stupid. I mean so units are more effective then others when dealing with certain things but you can still with with just one type of unit and that is plain stupid not strategical. And strategy is what made halo, well halo you can't charge the enemy with a pistol when he was a shotgun, but this game says different. Thats why is fails and why bungie should not lend out the name. Its time for Halo to retire.
After the 6.5 review was released by gamespot i said to my self why has every other review gave it around the 8.0 mark. hum yer because its worth about that. Gameplay. Works great for a console. very streamlined. ... Read Full Review
It's good while it lasts, but it will appeal more to fans of Halo and casual RTS players than anyone looking for a deeply engrossing strategy game.(gamespot review) Its funny that it is halo wars so you would think it ... Read Full Review
