The more I read and see of this game, the more I think it will really surprise us and end up being an unbelievable game.
I'm gonna take a risk and say AAA, I have high hopes for this game. It looks like a fresh, promising new IP
The more I read and see of this game, the more I think it will really surprise us and end up being an unbelievable game.
I'm gonna take a risk and say AAA, I have high hopes for this game. It looks like a fresh, promising new IP
[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]It doesn't matter if ANY console doesn't get maxed after just 5 years or so. There is STILL a place for newer technology to enter the market, and 5-6 years is th standard. Sorry if you don't like that Jesse, but many people don't pick up the newest model as soon as it's released, keeping to their current one for another couple of years, and you can too.
Don't like the 5 year cycle? Too bad, it doesn't revolve around your preferences.
Oh and PS2 was still released while PS1 wasn't maxed out (5 years after PS1). PS3 was released while PS2 wasn't maxed out (God of War had come out just the year before, and PS3 releasing 6 years after PS2). You think PS4 won't be out by 2011-2012 while PS3 still has so much potential to explore?
So WHY do you make it out like it's a crime for MS to release a new console 5 years after X360 when it DOES still have graphical potential? Why not cry about Sony releasing PS4 only 6 years after PS3? Double Standard much?
jessie5788
this isn't like buying a tv or an ipod. this is a console. something you drop hundreds and hundreds of dollars on. if this were to be the standard no one will play games and the industry will go down the drain. i know if i bought a 360 in it 4 year and find out its going to be replaced then i would sell it. no use in wasting money. you should look at the post on page one. it show that console aren't replaced in 5 years and its clear that ms is trying to make it standard.
TVs and ipods are updated and re-released far more than consoles are, and cost as much or more as any of the new consoles. With your logic, buying computers, televisions, ipods, or anything electronic is completely useless because they'll just be replaced in a few years. Of any electronic products, consoles actually last the longest. A new ipod is released every two years, new computers are released almost on a monthly basis, and televisions are optimized and given higher resolutions every year or two as well. A console lasts at least twice as long as any of these other products, and a good TV or an ipod touch can cost just as much or hundreds of dollars MORE than a console.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]over 75k and single is pretty "rich"[QUOTE="rimnet00"] You mean the one that says, if you are single and make over $75K, you are considered "rich" and pay more tax? $125k for couples? This is the one Obama is talking about. Quofan
My sister makes that much, and just bought a house all willy nilly.
I am making $68k coming out of college. That's not exactly "rich". Considering how much the value of the dollar has inflated. I don't see why I had to work hard to get a good degree in college, and now I get to pay even more money because I worked hard, instead of dropping out of college.
You can live however you want on 68k :lol:Don't try and talk about inflation. That's a CRAPload of money. You'll be able to buy a car, rent, food, any video games/systems you want, etc.
Don't complain about BS.
And in the UK, we cant afford to buy houses or even get our feet on the property ladder. House prices are getting ridiculous.
I say Socialism FTW :D
WRONG
[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"]cows, they amuse me. look at gears compared to bioshock or CoD4 and you will get your answer. btw unchared sucks rumpJared2720
If you prefer the 360 over the PS3, fine, but saying that Uncharted sucks is just plain ignorant and foolish.
Why, is it against the law to not like Uncharted?
Log in to comment