[QUOTE="123Sippi"][QUOTE="Maddie_Larkin"]
*Boots up Arma3 looks at the graphics, shuts it down again* So TC... either you hagve the most horrible PC of all times (one that can barely even run the game). Or you need glasses (or simply take off the fanboy goggles, that alone would help).
Game looks pretty damn impressive on my pc, it gives BF3 a run for the money. And size does have an influence on graphics aswell. Give me a console game where I can see a firefight from other players 10 km away ingame, with the same kind of graphics, and come back to me. Oh wait you can't because Consoles have not the scale nor alot that can match Arma3s visuals.
Well movement looks rather rough, alot of reused assets from what Ive seen. It is by no means perfect, it is a mid tier game. One that seemingly kicks the ass of pretty much any game showed sofar on the next gen of consoles (not that conolse games wont get better looking as time goes by, the launchgames always look butt ugly).
Maddie_Larkin
lol your eyes suck if you think next gen games of the next gen consoles are ugly lolYou mean like the flat unbumbed surfaces? the very low drawdistance weve seen sofar? the lack of the console versions of a good number of multiplats shown? (there for no one can comment)
Yeah I can honestly say the launch games do NOT match what they should without trying to fool myself. We have one game that looks what you would expect from a new gen (meaning lower end of a new leap) the rest? They look fairly bad, or have not even been shown running on the respectible platforms yet, so yeah I can say that.
your eyes just sucks
Log in to comment