123Sippi's forum posts

Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="123Sippi"]yeah im sure you know all the tech thats in gta 5lundy86_4

GTA V map is 49 square miles. Or, just shy of 80KM.

Arma 3's map is 270 square KM's.

That's 3.4x bigger.

Hey, sippi.

like i said you know ALL the tech going into gta5
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]Looks so bad that it looks better than 100% of current console titles.ReadingRainbow4

That's not exactly a crowning achievement.

yeah looking better than 100% of wii games isnt a crowning achievment
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

[QUOTE="KillzoneSnake"]

If you compare it to Shadow Fall it looks dead ugly. I dont care how big the maps are.

uninspiredcup

 

Agreed, Particularly the multiplayer, Shadow Fall looks terrible. Really bad use of lightshafts and bloom.

 

rsz_killzone-shadow-fall-multiplayer-scr

 

Arma 3 (being a big boy pc game) lets you customize it. Even on default it's better.

E0519EA77966D578DEDD93317C4B35C34A341695

screens? why not gameplay vs gameplay
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

[QUOTE="123Sippi"][QUOTE="Maddie_Larkin"]

*Boots up Arma3 looks at the graphics, shuts it down again* So TC... either you hagve the most horrible PC of all times (one that can barely even run the game). Or you need glasses (or simply take off the fanboy goggles, that alone would help).

Game looks pretty damn impressive on my pc, it gives BF3 a run for the money. And size does have an influence on graphics aswell. Give me a console game where I can see a firefight from other players 10 km away ingame, with the same kind of graphics, and come back to me. Oh wait you can't because Consoles have not the scale nor alot that can match Arma3s visuals.

Well movement looks rather rough, alot of reused assets from what Ive seen. It is by no means perfect, it is a mid tier game. One that seemingly kicks the ass of pretty much any game showed sofar on the next gen of consoles (not that conolse games wont get better looking as time goes by, the launchgames always look butt ugly).

Maddie_Larkin

lol your eyes suck if you think next gen games of the next gen consoles are ugly lol

You mean like the flat unbumbed surfaces? the very low drawdistance weve seen sofar? the lack of the console versions of a good number of multiplats shown? (there for no one can comment)

Yeah I can honestly say the launch games do NOT match what they should without trying to fool myself. We have one game that looks what you would expect from a new gen (meaning lower end of a new leap) the rest? They look fairly bad, or have not even been shown running on the respectible platforms yet, so yeah I can say that.

your eyes just sucks
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Graphically aside from nice lighting and models, the rest look like junk sh*t. It's understandable since it's catering for a huge area but still, graphics is graphics. Smaller map games will always look better. If judging by screenshot even some PS3 games look better.uninspiredcup


But it looks better than all console games.

yeah paper mario
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

Because their peasant eyes aren't used to good graphics and they think it's the graphics king or something.

It should be named the king of "in your face" lighting.

Lumpy311
it is graphics king period and ive been playing good graphics all gen on ps3 exclusives so whatever
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

*Boots up Arma3 looks at the graphics, shuts it down again* So TC... either you hagve the most horrible PC of all times (one that can barely even run the game). Or you need glasses (or simply take off the fanboy goggles, that alone would help).

Game looks pretty damn impressive on my pc, it gives BF3 a run for the money. And size does have an influence on graphics aswell. Give me a console game where I can see a firefight from other players 10 km away ingame, with the same kind of graphics, and come back to me. Oh wait you can't because Consoles have not the scale nor alot that can match Arma3s visuals.

Well movement looks rather rough, alot of reused assets from what Ive seen. It is by no means perfect, it is a mid tier game. One that seemingly kicks the ass of pretty much any game showed sofar on the next gen of consoles (not that conolse games wont get better looking as time goes by, the launchgames always look butt ugly).

Maddie_Larkin
lol your eyes suck if you think next gen games of the next gen consoles are ugly lol
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts
You also have to keep in mind that this a photo realistic art style is much harder to produce than a stylized environment like that of Killzone.lhughey
lol surely they dont even have to draw up art to make photorealistic environment and more often than not photorealistic worlds have destructible environments that to me shows that photorealistic worlds are easier to produce else killzone and other games would have destrutibility
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Jesus christ, it looks so "bad" because it has a map that is probably larger than GTA V, with WAY more special effects, everything being rendered in REAL TIME and having 2000 AI battles, etc.

pelvist

 

Its 4 times the size of GTAV map.

yeah im sure you know all the tech thats in gta 5
Avatar image for 123Sippi
123Sippi

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 123Sippi
Member since 2013 • 237 Posts

Even if ARMA has technical defeciencies, what it accomplishes is way above and beyond what consoles can achieve, Heck i want a console version of ARMA on the PS4 if possible:(

megaspiderweb09
sike, consoles like wii u