This question is asked mainly towards Atheists and Agnostics. I'd like for Christians to refraim from answering this. I'm merely curious as to your interpretation of the event, and what he could have possibily done before his "ressurection". Your answer could be serious, or just for the luls, whatever floats your boat.

I think he was posting on OT, celebrating his 10K post anniversary.

Everyone in this damn thread would merely ask for proof that he did these so-called miraculous signs. The Shamai said he had a demon and that was how he was doing those things. I guess Jesus only did his miracles in certain parts of cities where he knew people wouldn't shoo the lip claiming he was of Satan or something. I realize the testimonies of the disciples and the Early Christian Church isn't even worth considering to most people.

Hey...let's look at Jesus on a larger scale, using historical evidence. Years after his passing, the 2nd temple was destroyed, Rome became permeated with Christianity and hit the bucket. Jews developed the Talmud over a period of 300-400 years, trying to adapt temple worship and sacrifice into their daily lives. What's a Jew without a temple or a blood sacrifice anyway? Maybe it's unbiblical, and maybe this Talmud is heresy.

Or maybe Jesus being the final blood sacrifice and spiritual temple of cleansing water and bread of life...hahaha, maybe Jesus is the spiritual temple of the Jews. The temple destoyed could have been some message to the Jews about salvation.

I realize the sincerity of the Disciples carries no merit for most. And their writings may have been fornicated, but I recall most of the 12 dieing horrible deaths at the hands of the "pious", and their sincerity left and unshakle impression on the Roman Empire. That and Paul's testimony as well.

I'm not a theist or anything, but it's really some interesting stuff, lol.