2beers_in_hand's forum posts

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"]

Oh my god, liek wow! Another mediocre rehash from the best copycats ever! Seeing as they're copycats, it would be unreasonable to expect that Treyarch have the free will required to break from Infinity Ward's "innovation" of requiring PC users to use a proprietary P2P network and barring them from sharing or creating any custom content. Besides, if IW is on Acti's leash, what makes you think that Treyarch isn't on a shorter one? Treyarch has only one purpose, and that's cashing in on the name "Call of Duty." WaW was already a hackjob....ridiculous gameplay mechanics, totally unrealistic and historically inauthentic down to the slightest minutia, and everything else was a direct copy from COD4, down to the netcodeand the graphics engine.Brownesque
Don't you think your over exaggeratinga little bit??? While you could definitly argue that WaW was a glorified expansion pack... Don't you feel your being overly harsh to Treyarch??? You said it yourself while IW is Acti's poster board, Trey would be the abused red headed stepchild forced to live in the attic... Lets give Trey some credit here pal!!! At least they could give us campaign co-op with up to four people and not have to recycle lvls and call them specialops missions with only two players... Also Didn't Trey introduce the most popular new feature to any CoD in years??? Yup Zombie survival!!! If you look at the packages side by side WaW is the better deal with more options... I'm sure Treyarch would love to go off and make something new but unfortunately Acti wont allow it... One last thing unlike IW who can take their sweet time on CoD, Trey is forced to make various ports or new games in the same time frame...

they also had another game mode, this is particularly why i feel mw2 is a step back, all they really did was rearange the perks and add kill streaks so you could mass slaughter your opponents.

Seriously!!! I mean come on they are using the same engine slightly updateded... They spent more time on emblems and call signs then anything else...
Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

Oh my god, liek wow! Another mediocre rehash from the best copycats ever! Seeing as they're copycats, it would be unreasonable to expect that Treyarch have the free will required to break from Infinity Ward's "innovation" of requiring PC users to use a proprietary P2P network and barring them from sharing or creating any custom content. Besides, if IW is on Acti's leash, what makes you think that Treyarch isn't on a shorter one? Treyarch has only one purpose, and that's cashing in on the name "Call of Duty." WaW was already a hackjob....ridiculous gameplay mechanics, totally unrealistic and historically inauthentic down to the slightest minutia, and everything else was a direct copy from COD4, down to the netcodeand the graphics engine.Brownesque
Don't you think your over exaggeratinga little bit??? While you could definitly argue that WaW was a glorified expansion pack... Don't you feel your being overly harsh to Treyarch??? You said it yourself while IW is Acti's poster board, Trey would be the abused red headed stepchild forced to live in the attic... Lets give Trey some credit here pal!!! At least they could give us campaign co-op with up to four people and not have to recycle lvls and call them specialops missions with only two players... Also Didn't Trey introduce the most popular new feature to any CoD in years??? Yup Zombie survival!!! If you look at the packages side by side WaW is the better deal with more options... I'm sure Treyarch would love to go off and make something new but unfortunately Acti wont allow it... One last thing unlike IW who can take their sweet time on CoD, Trey is forced to make various ports or new games in the same time frame...

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

[QUOTE="ahmedkandil"]You guys still have not explained why MW2 is so bad. IMO it's just like CoD4 wich wasn't exactly a crap game to begin with...JangoWuzHere

Its not really an improved sequel over COD4. The "wow" factor has died out it seems. I personally think that the sequel should have a campaign of at least 10 hours.

Lets think of this for just a minute

Crysis Warhead:

5 hour long campaign

New multiplayer game modes.

New maps


40$ at release

Modern warfare 2:

5 hour long campaign

New multiplayer modes

New Maps

Spec ops

60$ at release

Really not a major improvement in anyway. Its just overpriced if you ask me.



Pretty much!!! It seems they spent more time on crappy emblems then the game its self...
Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

Attention Scanix and Jerk !!! Darksiders will score better on the PS3 then Bayonetta only because of a crappy port... :D

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

It will still be awesome its said Sega didn't ask Sony to help earlier...

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

Merry Chrismas everyone!!! I hope everyone stays safe and as a great one!!!

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

PS3 has web browser, there nothing she can't do i can't find on google :PJavieralijandro
Dirty but hilarious well said...Reminds me of that Southpark with Stans dad lol...

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"][QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]

You fanboys are off in your own little world.

Also play the game before you respond champ...

:lol: Pretty sad when you are so delusional about a game's flaws that you build yourself up to believe that everyone who finds something wrong with the game must not have played it.

Heres a better one play KZ2, UZ or MW2 and i'll tool you... But remember to play the game first...
Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts
[QUOTE="JHUTCHINSON0015"]

I don't understand this, Demons Souls got a 9.0/10 but uncharted 2 got a 9.5/10 yet Gamespot has Demons souls winning ps3 game of the year over uncharted 2? That makes not sense. And so does this mean U2 has no shot of winning game of the year on gamespot even though it is higher than DS? It would be ridiculous to have DS win ps3 game of the year but U2 win over all game of the year. i dont know. Anyway, sound off on what you think.

Ps. Ive played uncharted 2 and it is amazing! I have not play DS so im not bashing it, Gamespots decision just doesn't make sense to me if they base their picks off of highest rated.

Thanks and Merry Christmas

DS is the the PS3 game of the year, while U2 is the game of the year...
Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

Poor maintenance crew but the paid should be good.

Everiez
Do you know what your saying???