3forFlinching's forum posts

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

I think the animation looks fine, very similar to the old SSFII Turbo game. It seems jarring at first maybe because the artwork is so crisp and tightly rendered. But considering that Backbone and Udon didn't add any new frames of animation, it still looks and plays exactly like how I remember it...well, almost because the darn D-pad on my 360 controls is so hard to get used to! :P

And when you really think about, it would be too difficult and would take too long to make a Third Strike HD because the animation frames in Third Strike is just too crazy. It'd be nice to see a cleaner Third Strike like Guilty Gear, but I think the animation in Third Strike is so good, I really don't think a HD version can improve on it. Also, Udon and Backbone would have a huge work cut out for them if they did. Third Strike moves and plays like a Disney animated cartoon, silky smooth and the best 2D fighting animation in a game ever made. The sprites in the original SFII looks archaic and misproportioned when you see it now so Udon's artwork looks great in the remake. But with Third Strike, I feel it's a different story because the original Third Strike animators were professional animators who drew the Third Strike characters meticulously. And not taking any credit away from Udon or Backbone, but I don't see how their work can improve on Third Strike's superior artwork. That's why I don't think a remake would work well in this case.

They can probably retrace the frames, frame by frame, but that's about it. Third Strike is a masterpiece that shouldn't be touched, in my honest opinion.

ASK_Story

Just bought the green controler and the new D-pad is really good, much better then the standard.

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

The reason the PS3 is more expensive is because you get more value from the start. You might not want or need these things but if you do the PS3 is cheaper or at least has more value from the start. That is, if you are going to buy all those things for the 360 that you get for free with the PS3.

It's the same reason 360 owners pay for XBL and PS3 owners get PSN for free. People wouldn't pay for XBL Gold if you didn't get any more value than a free competitive service.

The PS3 is more expensive from the start but you get more value from it.

XBL Gold is more expensive than PSN but you get more value from it.

If you were to buy all the things you get with the PS3 to your 360 it will end more expensive but at the same time you might not need them.

It's simple really, The PS3 is much more expensive in the beginning but it could end up cheaper in the end.

JLF1

/Thread

Good post

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="3forFlinching"]Resident Evil is really a very limited name if you see how the series has evolved. AgentA-Mi6

you mean from horror survival to third person shooter/adventure :P

More thinking about that the virus was confined in a small town at the begining. Small area, big problem. To me resident evil has a claustrophobic ring to it, not nowing who is affected or what it is. Biohazard more of something world wide and exact.

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Resident Evil is really a very limited name if you see how the series has evolved.
Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Or here if you whant to stay inside Gamespot.
Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

No one. Mercs 2 sucks. You should've saved money for Red Faction Guerilla.madcapper248

This is why you should ask this kind of questions here instead link, less stupid answers.

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Well then roll back to the old drivers?...............X360PS3AMD05

Well the problem is you can't get them anywhere, I tried that. I also tried to see if Vista saved my previous configuration but it didn't. Sorry for snapping at you, tired of always getting stupid answers when posting on forums.

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Intel integrated graphics are infamous for sucking...........good luck.X360PS3AMD05

Thanx for the constructive advise....If you would have read the post I did state that there was no problem before instaling the new drivers. I´m not trying to play Crysis on this system just older games so I am well aware of it´s limitations.

Avatar image for 3forFlinching
3forFlinching

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 3forFlinching
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I just instald the new drivers for my GMA x3100 card on my laptop. When I run a game the screen flickers, it seems to be only the lower part of the screen thou. The flicker is not constant but I don´t know what triggers it. I did not have this problem prior to instaling the new drivers, what can I do.

My specs are:

Intel celeron processor 530 (1,73 Gh)
1Gb DDR2 ram
Vista

I know almost nothing of computers so please explain with basic terms.

Edit: Screen only flickers when I run Games, Ex Warcraft 3