If you are as aware of a gamer as me, than you have found that games seem to have their own kind of people. I find that the Public of Call of Duty, are a balanced society of hardy fun people, and highly competitive (but still not hellish) people. While in Halo 3, the people are generally negative with their gaming. The attitudes of Halo 3 tend to be overly aggressive, easily angered, stupid (yes as in not very smart), or oppressive of race, age, and speech. Than their are the gamers that I see in more tactical games such as Left 4 Dead and Gears of War (2). These people tend to have a positive side, and a negative side. The positive side are the ones that you have a fun match with (whether you win or lose), and end up adding as a friend. While the negative side are the people who glitch, team kill, or are extremely irritating to play with, and are the people who you end up filing a complaint about, just because they are so damn aggravating. I am wondering if you, the gaming public can one, be able to identify what kind of gamer you are. Or two, relate to my observations, and can help me find a way to find more positive people in places where you would not expect. If you can find an answer to any form of question you may have found in my writing, or just want to comment about it. Be my guest.

Is it just me, or do any whom this may concern find that in online 1st person shooters, such as Battlefield: Bad Company, Call of duty 4, etc. The M-16 as a gun, somehow pushes itself to be an extremely overpowered gun, and in the hands of every gamer wishing to get an easy kill that they really don't deserve. I've sat and screamed at my xbox 360 too many times now. And am now wondering if the rest of the world's gamers have been put in the difficult situation of, "Join the noobs," or "die (again and again and again) trying to prove a point both morally and publicly." But back to the base question: are you, fellow gamers, finding yourself put up against this overpowered weapon as much as I think you and me are?