Paid "professional" reviewers hold zero weight for me. We do not need to look to them in this age.
I'll give you a good example. FIFA 14. An absolute disaster of a game. The worst in the series for five years in my opinion (I played it for a month before selling it)
It gets gradings that are at masterpiece status across the board with all the paid critics.
On metacritic its average is around the high 8.5/10 with critics. With the general public, its around 4.3/10 on the same site.
Now, who would you believe? People who have played the game for at least several hours and who probably know what a football game should look like) or a hack who has a free copy and is being paid to play it for 30 mins?
I look at the AVERAGE of PUBLIC reviewers and make my mind up from that. This is common sense.
Log in to comment