I'm not surprised that, when compared with a high-end computer, the graphics on the PC are superior to the 360. However, I must say how sick I am of Gamespot members who argue that articles like these prove how the PC is in a league of its own. I'm going to use 00Ramol00 as an example, in this same comment section he wrote, "don't even include the PC dudes, PC always beats the competition (unless its a sh***y computer )". The PC does not always beat the competition, Gamespot's article proves that if you read it. Of the thousands of people who spend endless amounts of time arguing over how PC graphics are superior, only about 10% (and that may even be an overstatement) own a "High-End PC" which renders better graphics than the 360. As of now, I really feel that with the pricepoint of the 360, there is no way you can build a PC which will produce the same quality of graphics...and thats what should be considered. I agree that the high-end PC is superior...but this in no way means that PC's are in a league of their own.
Andrewc989's comments