Even as a gamer who plays 95% of the time on consoles (I have an 4 year old MacBook and therefore can only run something like Diablo II, which is an awesome game), I'm amazed at how great PC gaming can actually be and ashamed at some (a minority) of my fellow console gamers for being ignorant d****.

As for any graphics comparison, PC is first by a landslide, 360 and PS3 are even. Which brings my next question : why even bother making such comparisons since results are freaking obvious?

"The difference is, of course, that the game itself determines how important its story is to it. Not every game needs a big story to be awesome, but when a game spends a lot of time telling one, it's asking you to pay attention to it." & "Aren't the best games the ones that you think about even when you aren't playing them?" Right on the money, KVO.

The main difference is the brightness, which can be modified at any point in-game thrgouh the options menu or with your TV settings. Other than that... this is utterly pointless.

PC does look better. But honestly, they all look 98% the same. Why care?

I don't own a PC, but it looks (for me, anyway a wee bit better on it. As for PS3 vs 360, well it's pretty much the same, depending on the screenshot.

Great March Madness ahead people.

Yeah screenshots are not the best way to compare graphics. From those screenshots, the PS3 looks better, but the difference is really no big deal. The lighting affects too much.