[QUOTE="BatmanKapow"]I didnt play it much online, though friends and I got through the SP on insane. IMO - The Multiplayer is really limited by a few things. Off the top of my head:
1-No Respawning Deathmatches ( Halo 2 had it flaws and all, but one of the greatest moments in that game is being tied up 49-49 in a TDM and screaming at the TV if you won or lost that last kill. In GOW, sitting on the sidelines just isn't that much fun.
2-No Carrying over Game Lobbies? Really? It's kind of a waste to go back to the menu screen after every single game.
3-Why can't I play ranked matches with my friends? What's the point in making friends on xbl if I can't play with them in my games anyway?
This is just my opinion, but I really think this is why I already traded the game in. Once the WOW! factor is gone, and the SP is beaten, the MP just isn't deep enough to hold my interest. Anyone agree or disagree?
Gamertag - BatmanKapow
FearlessSpirit
Like the designers of Gears and even Jeff of Gamespot here said; 'You have no idea what Gears is about'.
I get the feeling allot of people here just played Gears because it was hyped. Only so many people play that game because they really like how the game is. And you know it's true. I can give answers to all you're questions in a flash.
1. The game would lose the tactical fast pace purpose it has.
2. It's about being with random people and start playing as a team real fast, with the best teamwork you can come up with.
3. See number 2. Also, Player Matches.
If you don't like how Gears is played, then don't play it. This is how Gears is. If you don't like it why get the game and start complaining about it?
It's just like people complaining about you using every single weapon. 'Stop chainsawing! Stop using the pistol! Stop using the Torque Bow! Boomshot is so cheap! Beat down w*ore!' etc. etc.
If you don't like the things in the game or how the game is played, then don't play it. It's real easy.
I never said I dont like the game. And I dont need your advise on what to play and what not to play. And I didnt race out to buy the game like everyone else, I got a copy of it from Microsoft's expertzone. I paid 5 bucks for the game. And I'm pretty sure I know what the game is about, despite what you, Jeff from Gamespot (oooooo) or the dev team may think or say. All I was trying to say was that the game isn't as deep as other multiplayer games. As a gamer, I'd rather play with my friends, rather than random people, and I don't want or need my games to make that decision for me. I get the point, I get the logic behind it. I just felt that Epic was limiting the gameplay options by doing this. Also, the game is only so fast paced when it's 4 on 4. When it becomes 4 on 1 or 1 on 1, those left sitting on the sidelines are bored out of their skulls. You don't have to agree with my opinion, but you should at least respect it enough to not insult me. I get the point of the game, I'm not an idiot. I'm saying I don't like the point of the game. It gets old too quick for something as good as this game, because the gameplay itself is top notch.
Log in to comment