[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]Worse than Dance Central?? Mmkay...Wasdie

This is why scores suck so much. Do you really think it's even fair to compare those games? I don't care if it got an 8.0, you're trying to compare a sim racer to some casual dance game. The casual dance game is going to be scored by comparisons made to others like it in it's own genre, same as GT5.

GT5 is being compared to games like GTR and Forza, and it falls flat. Dance Central is compared to other casual titles.

I'm pretty sure they are all inspired by sci-fi movies :P

Gees, guys, it's only a matter of time that EVERYTHING becomes part of motion controls, not just gaming. No need to be so tense about it.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I was talking about depth accuracy. The lights make it more accurate depth-wise and reviews of both hardwares tend to reflect that.Dire_Weasel

Absolutely incorrect. Move controller mapping is 1-1 and lag free in all 3 dimensions, Kinect is definitely not.

With the move controller it can function in 3d much more accurately than Kinect and also difference several players probably better also.kuraimen

PS Eye can still compete in this casual controller free space as seen with these gifs.PS3 clearly has the best motion setup as it has casual and precision.killzowned24

What is the need for Move if PS EyeToy was already so advanced?

While I understand the technology behind Kinect, I don't know about EyeToy so much, what I said in my previous posts was my own theory based on what I heard. Would you kindly explain it to me?

And, what I noticed is that all of the gifs you provided only show people moving from side to side (2D), but not forward and backward (3D). 3D sensor may or may not be needed depending on your point of view, however, 2D and 3D are different, and the technology that goes behind upgrading 2D to 3D should count as something.

In my theory, the reason why Sony created Move was to give the EyeToy a 3D aspect, so that the EyeToy can detect depth by detecting the Move. In another word, EyeToy on its own cannot do what Kinect does.

Am I right?

[QUOTE="Bear_in_Action"][QUOTE="FragTycoon"]

If they bothered, they wouldn't even need Move for that dance game (just like the punching blocks game). PS Eye can detect all the movements and create an outline of a person just like kinect.

People often think something new when it's not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_RTaAQ9RNM

xX-Incubus-Xx

I rarely see people bashing Kinect(other then the lag and inability to see darker skinned people). I almsot always see people bashing it's games. It just doesn't work well with games. Little party games to get drunk and fall over would be fun here and there. But that's about it.

I can see you have sipped some of the juice.

What part of Dance Central do you think uses 3d tracking? Go ahead and look at the vid again and ask yourself if it's just tracking the outline.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIRK34wfCAY

Off beat on every arm movement at 2:20 but the outline is right so... tadda! it counts. It doesn't have some magical skeletal detection system, sorry.

And to answer your "if eyetoy was so amazing blah blah blah",

1. They had better games to advertise
2. They wanted to push gaming forward by way of great games, not gimmicky controls

Both I appreciated very much until the recent Move push.

FraggTycoon