World at War had perks, and it was more unbalanced than Modern Warfare 2. It's obvious you never played the game, so please don't comment about it. It's bad enough the internet is full of Halo Haters who don't know anything about the game, we don't need more of your kind.
They casualized the FPS genre to the point where it's better suitable for the Wii and yet people are excited for their new games? No thanks. I don't want more deathstreaks. "7 Deathstreak: Press 6 for Godmode" (6 being the default key on PC for killstreaks in COD4)
343 Studios will be in charge of future Halo projects. If I'm not mistaken, they do have some former Bungie employees on the staff so hopefully they don't mess up too much.
Lol. Okay, thanks for the advice. I honestly dont play MW2 much, but I thought I'd play it more since all of my friends do. I just thought it would be easier to just stay in one place and use a light machine gun cuz Im no good at MW2. But, yeah I didn't realize it was that cheap to do.
JordanizPro
Camping is for lames..... Camping is a reliable tactic. No, I don't camp. I will never camp, but I understand there's nothing wrong with it. It's not a broken tactic that abuses exploits so there's no reason to say it's for lames. Obviously you have a dislike for it which is most likely due to you not being able to counter it. (Nobody dislikes something they know how to stop)
[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]lol I love how he took "camping" backxxxCr00k3dxxx
This^^ I actually lold.But seriously don't camp.Just get kills on your own without sitting in a corner.And there isnt a best map for any type of gun.Its just where you are in the map that matters. This is incorrect and also, gametype matters. Karachi and Favela for example, are maps best suitable for SMGs. They're small map and majority of the battles take place within close-quarters. An LMG wouldn't benefit you on these maps. Sure you would get kills (it's CoD, it's impossible to NOT get kills in this noobfest) but you would lose more battles than you would win. On the other hand, on larger maps like Derail or Wasteland wouldn't be very useful for SMGs and would be better suited for an LMG. I don't see where there's still this misconception that it doesn't matter what map you play. There's a reason why some people go 30-5 one game, and go 5-30 the next. It's not because they finally had a good game or they got lucky, it's because maybe on Wasteland they were sniping, but the next map was Favela, a map where sniping is basically useless against people who know what they're doing.
[QUOTE="Blaze092"]This sounds more like Shadowrun meets Halo which is an amazing combination. Shadowrun had some potential but sadly couldn't fulfill it, but it seems Halo has taken what Shadowrun did right and bringing it to Halo. SpiritOfFire117
Huh? MJOLNIR mk IV avatar. I never see any of those around here. I commend you for your originality. Thanks. Jerome and his MJOLNIR Mark IV armor is the only reason why I played Halo Wars. IMO Jerome > Master Chief. He just looks more badass, and he owned in the "Monster" cutscene. :D
This sounds more like Shadowrun meets Halo which is an amazing combination. Shadowrun had some potential but sadly couldn't fulfill it, but it seems Halo has taken what Shadowrun did right and bringing it to Halo.
I always quit when ever the nuke is called in as protest to adding such a pointless and gamebreaking feature. Think about how much camping would be reduced if the nuke (and possibly AC130 & Chopper Gunner) was gone.
ImproveMind
How is that in protest? You're still one of the 500k people who play this game everyday. If you wanted to protest you shouldn't even be playing the game to begin with because the Tactical Nuke isn't the only pointless and gamebreaking feature.
Log in to comment