are you mad that sony will have what live has for free. (even though Qore will charge people to play a demo)

what has micrsoft bring to the table.

on-line nope the pc had it as well as dreamcast.

controller nope same amount of buttons as the ps controller even the face buttons are the same layout with differant letters.

so tell me for 2 gens what is new from micrsoft. lol achivements there always been a high score now i guess you can brag about it to people you don't now

GARRYTH

You do realize that by making fun of achievements, you are also making fun of "trophies", right? Cows love to make fun of something they don't have and put it down, then once they get the same exact thing, it's the greatest thing ever. Sad, sad gamers.

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Just when you thought PSN is getting closer to XBL, XBL have it's seasonal updates and once again be more advance and have more features than PSN, it's like a cycle.

OsgoodSchlatter

Is the $50 fee a cycle?

I find it hilarious that that's the only thing you cows can say. "but but, we get PSN for free!" why? 'Cause it's half-a$$ed and Sony would be stupid to charge for it.

I also find it hilarious that you brag about having a "free online" but somehow fail to mention that you are going to have to pay for game demos. How much of a joke is that? $25 dollars a year for something that Xbox Live Silver lets you have for free.

[QUOTE="hopesfall2own"]Kinda like ps3 people bashing bioshock when it came out, and are now orgasming all over it. That's pretty typical of what you do when you get our hand me downs. SpruceCaboose

Is that how 360 owners feel about PC hand-me-downs?

360 gets Halo first, then the PC. 360 gets Mass Effect first, then PC. Only game that the 360 and PC have had come out on the same day was BioShock, though the 360 is the vastly superior version.

So in shorter words, you fail.

Jealousy. Pure jealousy.

Admittedly the game is not for everyone (people who suffer from ADHD come to mind) but a lot of the backlash is simply due to the fact that the PS3 now has a perfect 10 exclusive.

And well, that hurts some people.

OsgoodSchlatter

*sigh* You poor, poor cow. When will you learn that no one is jealous of one game that will be forgotten a year from now? You go outside of a internet message board, no one cares about MGS4.

Wow. That is harsh.

Just goes to show all, ytou really don't know until the game is released. Really. You can look at 100's of screenshots and videos and still have no clue how it really is.

Here endeth the lesson........

The_Crucible

Don't trust the IGN US review. The IGN UK review gave it either a 7 or 7.5, can't remember. Other sites have given it a 7. Something was just up the a$$ of the IGN US reviewer.

I'm glad I didn't trust the ONE IGN US review and looked at other reviews as well, cause I would've missed out on a good (at times great) game. Sadly, too many people nowadays have no idea how to think for themself and will just go along with that one review.

[QUOTE="Doctor-Salvador"][QUOTE="Koalakommander"]

I totally called this one. I own.

Called it when they showed the first demonstration that blew everyone away.

It just looked bad to begin with to me.

Koalakommander

Well, I'm glad you can brag about a company's misfortune. I'm sure all of the people that will lose money from this are real happy for you.

I'm bragging about my ability to spot terrible games.

How is this "misfortune" in any way? They had complete control over how their game was made. They are just bad at what they do.

Sadly, this game will still sell 300,000+ copies easily because it has guns in it, so it won't be a complete loss.

Well, then you should really stop bragging. It's not a terrible game, the IGN US review is WRONG. Way wrong. Alone in the Dark requires a brain and patience and sadly this generation doesn't have either. Just look at the user reviews, 7.1 compared to 3.5. Tells you right there how wrong the review is.

I saw one combat preview and actually lol'ed out alloud. It looked insanely bad if I remember correctly, some plastic looking thing flailing around like an old 1930s animation.hywel69

Then you have one awful memory. Plastic looking thing flailing around? I am lol'ing at your...erm...assessment. You probably weren't even looking at the right game, cause it's a very fun game (and I can say that, seeing as how I have played it and love it).

IGN US is wrong once again. Just look at the user ratings on IGN (7.1). If that doesn't say how off the loser that reviewed it is, then nothing will.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Iceman2911"]

I PERSONAL think it could still be the year the ps3 since I play mgs4, after that socom and LBP, Then Resistance 2 and naruto. I will be busy all this year.Also don't forget the updates and home.

Al3x_n90

Alright then, these are 5 important titles, what does the 360 have (AAAe) this year ? not even GeOW2 cuz it'll be on the PC as well.:roll:

By the time people play it on a computer, no one will care about Gears 2 anymore.

[QUOTE="-Jiggles-"][QUOTE="TheNuyorican"]

I have a question for you guys.

How would you go about marketing your product?

rumtumtugger

Tell the truth so that the consumer doesn't bite me in the ass later on.

"HI there! Our 360 has a 33% failure rate, but that's not a problem since we will repair it for you and you only need wait a month. Our console is also for everyone in the family, if you can count one family oriented game as for everyone. So please buy our console!"

When will cows learn that the failure rate for the 360 is drastically down? Probably never, but I sure wish that they would try.

As for someone else that mentioned "$50 a month, laggy online":lol: I would rather pay $50 ONCE A YEAR (it's once a year cows, get your "facts" straight) for an online service that is proven and praised worldwide, as opposed to the PSN that will never come close to being decent and has that tacked on feel.