Anyone who bashes Socom because of graphics is just a fanboy grasping for straws. Socom has never been about graphics..

But hey, I forgot graphics make a great game. Thats why Lair got a 10.0 and Crysis got a 15. (out of 10)

xbox 360 is a real gaming machine while ps3 doesnt have as many good games as 360....which means currently 360 pwns ps3 games wise and thats all gamers should care aboutmingo123

Considering most people don't play 10 different games at a time it doesn't matter. Usually people will play one or two games, maybe a 3 or 4. It doesn't matter if you have more quantity because in the end, you probably only play 3 games while the others sit there making your collection look pretty.

Also, in the gaming world today most people probably only play one game. A multiplayer game such as COD4, Halo 3, UT3, Crysis, etc. since you can put hours into them.

Agree or disagree?

Regarding 3, they use points because its universal. It would be harder to use the currencies of each respective country.

Regarding 4, by the time PSN catches up to Xbox Live (as it is now), XBL will have improved even more. It still has a long way to go unlike most fanboys claim.

However, I went from 360 to PS3 because I don't even get RROD, my 360's constantly freeze so I just said forget it and got a PS3. Resistance, Unreal Tournament 3 and Madden 08 keep me busy. Also i'll be getting Ratchet & Clank and Uncharted because I enjoyed both demos so I won't be starved of games as the 360 fanboys say.

Packers beat Patriots? Your out of your mind. Everyone is underrating the Patriots severely. Almost everyone was saying how the Jags' two man running game would run all over the Patriots, meanwhile they looked like third string players against them.

I'm not shocked at the Dallas game, I was saying the entire time that the Patriots game boosted the Giants confidence even though they lost. What shocked me was the Chargers game. Especially since Rivers, Tomlinson and Gates really did not play the fourth quarter.

All the divisional games were amazing though. I'm glad I got to watch great games instead of boring one-sided games like the BCS games were.

[QUOTE="CherrySkittle"][QUOTE="Luke-85"]I'm talking about, the BEST O line and receievers. Don't ever talk about the Bengals D, they have been in the bottom half of OPPG for a long time now. A Few years back, the Bengals made the Playoffs and lost a close game when there starter was hurt, they would have won. You know what, the team they lost to, WON THE SUPERBOWL. Palmer has better Mechanics, plus Brady can throw it to Wes Welker whenever Donte or Randy aren't open, Palmer dosn't have the best slot guy in the game. Plus if the Bengals had the Pats D this year, they'd be 14-2 with a worse O line (I did the math)

Luke-85

So would have's and could have's make Carson Palmer the better QB.

Why does this year even matter? Brady led the Patriots to a Superbowl win when he took over after Bledsoe got injured. Everyone expected the Patriots to become an utter failure (such as if Peyton got injured, nobody would think that Jim Sorgi would lead them to a Superbowl, let alone win it) and they beat The Greatest Show On Turf who had one of the best offenses the past decade along with a good defense.

Or how about the other two years when he had no good recievers (besides Branch) let alone a slot reciever? That's your excuse as to why Carson hasn't won, yet Brady managed to do it.

Being a great QB takes much more than mechanics, but you obviously do not know that since you are saying Palmer is better than Brady when most would would know it is completely moronic to compare Brady or Peyton to any QB in the League today. They are just way ahead of everyone, but of course since they are so successful everyone wants to hate them.

PS: You did the math? Your obviously another moron who thinks that "oh if they stopped them here they wouldn't have gotten the TD so lets take off the 7 points, we would've won 23-17 if it wasn't for that" while not realizing the entire game would have been played differently. I'm done with you..your just another pathetic Brady hater who has no legit argument as to why you hate him. Your only reasons are theoretical situations and an little paragraph about him having gay milkshake wars with Matt Cassel.

When Carson wins atleast one ring, then you can come back to me. Even though by then Brady will probably have about five or six.

Don't say Welker is a bad argument, If you have to WR's who need serious attention, than Welkers open almost every play, so if nothings open deep, give it to wes or Moroney, plus best O line EVER.

Welker was not on any of the Superbowl teams. Brady has been winning long before Moss, Stallworth and Welker arrived in town. I think you might want to go to nfl.com and go to the New England Patriots official website and research the past seven years and what they've done, and then look at the subpar offensive players that Brady had.

PSN cannot compete with Xbox Live, but for anyone who isn't a fanboy we can live with that considering XBL has been out for five years while PSN only has a little over a year under its belt.

Also considering its free doesn't hurt, although it doesn't make it better as some people try to say. Piss is free, doesn't mean its better than a beer or any drink for that matter.

Palmers still better, plus he doesn't say things like this, just search for, 16 reasons to root against the patriots, go to the site thats called Touchdown dot org, and read reason number 3. Please do it.

Luke-85

:lol: that was pretty funny.

I still don't see how that proves Carson Palmer is better than Tom Brady. Is it because he came out of USC and right away became a starter? It certainly isn't the stats or achievements because Brady just makes nearly every player today look like a high school player.

I just find it amazing how everyone can hate Brady, yet most people idolize these Hall of Famers who they never saw play. They just see that they're in the HOF and their stats and proclaim they were great. In 15 years Tom Brady is going to be one of those players, we actually get to watch it happen instead of looking at number and highlights but people would rather hate him because he has gay milkshake fights with the backup QB or for any other dumb reason.

Brady isn't as good as Carson, he has the best O-Line and Receiving core, plus a amazing D, give Palmer that, he'd have 4 superbowls and 3 MVP's.Luke-85

You can't be serious. Please tell me your joking..

Why do the Brady haters think being a QB means you just throw the ball? You can't just give a QB a good offensive line, a good receiving core and a good defense and expect a QB who is one of the best all-time.

Eli has a great offensive line and defensive line and a good recieving core when all healthy, and even at its current state is equal, maybe better than what Brady had in his three Superbowl wins.

I'm about to just give up, everyone who hates Brady isn't going to change their mind.

PS: Carson a few years back had a great offensive line, a defense that forced the most turnovers (or top 5 atleast) and two great wide recievers in TJ Houshmenzadeh and Chad Johnson. Guess what? They lost, and have sucked ever since then. Carson is nowhere near Brady and if you believe that then you have no hope and shouldn't even follow football.

Everyone just wants to bash the Patriots and Brady because they are great. I just laugh at everyone, because I always make them look foolish when they bash the Patriots.

"Patriots barely got to 16-0" so you know what I say?

To Cowboy fans: "You remember that game when Tony Romo had 6 turnovers against the Bills and got a lucky onside kick and kicked the game winning field goal"

From Cowboy fans: "Does it matter? They won and were able to come through when it mattered most"

You can use that scenario to any fan and it'll be similar. When their team wins, it's because they are good but when the Patriots do it, it's luck and help from the refs. I guess everyone forgot that before 16-0, now 17-0, Tom Brady was and still is, one of the greatest late game performers of all time in any sport. But hey, he has had a million angels and the luck of the Irish by him since he replaced Drew Bledsoe as an unknown and defeated the St. Louis Rams in the Superbowl.

But they're not good at all, neither is he.

All he has are irrelevant achievements such as two Superbowl MVP awards, three Superbowl rings and just recently most TD passes in a season, leading his team to an undefeated regular season and the highest completion percentage EVER in the history of the NFL.

As one of the sore losers from the Jaguars said, anyone can go 26-28 and do all the things he does.

It's just too bad nobody has and nobody has the ability to in the NFL besides Peyton Manning.