@Kashmiro Actually, the Xbox 360 has a better GPU. PS3 has a better processor, which makes it easier for developers to make games like MAG on the PS3. Sources: http://ps3.ign.com/articles/614/614682p1.htmlhttp://hardware.teamxbox.com/articles/xbox/1144/The-Xbox-360-System-Specifications/p1 The 360 has a higher bandwidth for the GPU than the PS3.

Crysis has been TAMED! What an amazing card... Too bad it's double the price of the others -.-

All in all, the PS3 was blurrier in some points, but in COD4 it had better shadows. I have a theory why some multiplatform games look better on the Xbox 360. When you develop a game on the PC, the PC usually renders games in Direct X (Xbox 360), not Open GL like the PS3. The developer would be more familiar with the tools for Direct X because the games are developed on a Direct X platform. Also, the PS3 uses a cell type processor architecture. The Cell Processor is a brand new innovation, thus the developers are still learning about it and what it can too. Don't quote me on this but I hear developers say that it is harder to code for the Cell than it is for the Xenon processor. I'm not going to lie, I have a 360 and a Wii, but the PS3 is a great contendor, it just needs some time for the developers to get used to it. But one thing that bothers me in the end is when people say: "XXXXX is better than YYYYYY! YYYYYY is ****!!