[QUOTE="cainetao11"]right now for me it's the crowned achievement in L4D. I just can't seem to get that witch with one shot.cheez-it_kid

Agreed COD2 on veteran was the insane, I mean seriuosly those nazis could teach theguys from "Wanted" a few things about pulling off headshots, not to mention the endless waves off enemies that could only be stoped by reaching a certain point.

Is there anyway to have a look at them

ok I think that this has gone on for a little longer than is well sane.. so let me sum it up THEY ARE BOTH GOOD GAMES WITH ALOT TO OFFER in my personal opion crysis is the better buy, but you could go alot worse when picking games than with Bioshock and I mean ALOT WORSE!!!!

also the AI in Crysis are incrediably smart if equiped with a little xray vision that will sometimes make u scream "I WAS BEHIND THE **** ROCK U KOREAN TOSSBAG WHY THE **** WOULD U THROW A GRENADE BEHIND A ROCK WHEN U HAVENT LOOKED FOR ANYTHING THERE"

PS: msfa your post scared me

TOM CLANCY GAMES

Splinter cell, Ghost recon and Rainbow 6 are extremly inovative compared to normal mainstream shooter games with great gameplay that makes u really feel like u are part of the action personally I am surprised that they havent been mentioned before this.

BTW Bioshock sucked and crysis and far cry ruled (just a little less than tom clancy)

Thats true to an extent.

You see, a good shooter will be fun. CoD4 is a good shooter because its lots of fun.

A great shooter, however, is both fun and innovative. That is why Halflife, STALKER, and Crysis are great shooters and Quake 4, Doom 3, and CoD 4 are only good shooters.

mrbojangles25

SOMEONE GIVE THIS GUY A MEDAL

BTW Crysis actually has a good multiplayer even though many over look it.

Also Frontlines fuel of war is very origional in my opion and with a patch or 2 could be one of the best shooters out in a very long time

I reckon when ever and other unit sees a zerg it should say "IS THAT MY MOTHER-IN-LAW... NO NOT ENOUGH WORTS"