Developers that push franchises past their prime IE Assassin's Creed is getting worse and worse.

It goes WoW> Burning Crusade>Wrath of the Lich King>Cataclysm

Mists of Pandaria is not out yet. You need the original to get the next expansion and etc. I would just buy them all, you do not get the full experience unless you do.

The creator was hoping for 4 season then a movie I believe, but I mean I think they can drag it on for a few more years regardless.

Ya, I'm aware of that but almost all shows that have been put on hold end up being cancelled :S

The issue here though is that in Sun Tzu's time warfare was totally different. Basically, armies travelled in massive groups going to strategic points. The biggest thing is that they had no guns just men and swords (simplification) so there was no need to go into towns and cities to rape and pillage to beat down the enemy. If you beat their main army you essentialyl won. That isnt the case anymore.

Was just wondering what GS thought of Community being cancelled, it sucks that they actually cancel good shows and CBS can keep baddies on like TAAHM

I am probably one of the only people to say "No, this is crazy."

Ok I assume the OP had the US, China, India, Russia in mind when they were talking about a World War, well lets deal with the US.

Basically the biggest tension currently exists between the US and China, foremost, the Chinese are an easy 15 years behind the Americans, this gives them a deterrent to attack. Assuming they did attack, no one else would probably involve themselves. Europe is kinda busy atm, and Russia would not want to pick sides. Given this, if a war broke out, which I have to stress is extremely unlikely, the Americans would financially destroy the Chinese (an economic war, which I will explain in a sec) and militarily destroy the Chinese within 5 years. A currency war on the other hand the Americans would still destroy the Chinese. They have more economic might, and the bonus of their currency being the world's reserve currency, they would win in a currency war. So, that is how the China-US situation would play out.

Russia right now, is still so far behind economically, militarily, socially, infrastructure wise, like they usually are through out history. Russia is not a country to be worried about, they can be beaten in any circumstance.

The US and India would most definately be allies in this conflict.

So basically, the Chinese would not want a war, they would wait it out. The Americans, assuming they fix their econimic problems, will be okay, and the Russians just could not handle a war at this point. Given these things no World War will break out in the foreseeable future.

Self explanatory.

Which way should the Americans go to fixing their current fiscal situation? Classic Keynesian policy or Supply Side policy?

Firstly, if the Allies did not nuke Japan, it is estimated the war would have lasted another 5 years, and millions of Allies would die, 500,000 purple hearts were created for the possible invasion of Japan before the nuclear bombing.

All things go in war, the funny thing is if you lose you become the war criminal. Civilian casualties must be accepted and modern warfare is much different than back in the day. In war, all things go. The Germans sunk the Luciana in WWI, they did sink neutral and civilian ships in WWII also. This was a solid plan to beat the Allies into submission until the convoy system was introduced.

Basically when going into a modern war, concerning civilians, the question must be asked does the government being attacked even care about civilian casualites? If we were to attack, say, North Korea, Kimmy would not care about civilian casualites and therefor you do not further your military goal. The basic conclusion here is that if killing civilians en masse furthers your MILITARY goal than yes it is a fully acceptable military strategy.

They should use the economy to improve Quality of life instead of pouring it in the military.krazy-blazer