Cowboy48's forum posts

Avatar image for Cowboy48
Cowboy48

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Cowboy48
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
No advice from anyone?
Avatar image for Cowboy48
Cowboy48

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Cowboy48
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Before anyone yells about the below mentioned PC not being a gaming PC please remember that I know that but I need constructive input anyway.

 

System:

IBM P4 2.4GHz

256MB RAM (soon to be 512)

PCI slots only

 

Question:

Will either the 5200 or the 6200 play Tiger Woods 2007 well?  If the answer is yes then is there a big difference between the 2 cards? Keep in mind that they are both connected to a PCI expansion slot.

 

Thanks

Avatar image for Cowboy48
Cowboy48

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Cowboy48
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I agree with the memory upgrade to 512. He normally doesn't play games but some friends of his from where he used to live talked him into d/l TW2007 so they could all play online but his old system was way too slow. He got the new system for $105, still under the original IBM warranty, so he couldn't pass it up. How much slower is the 5200 compared to the 6200 considering that they are both slaved into a slow PCI slot?
Avatar image for Cowboy48
Cowboy48

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Cowboy48
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

I am looking for some advice concerning a friend of mine's PC.  He has a 2.4 P4 IBM PC with 256MB ram.  He is looking to play Tiger Woods 2007 but the computer only has PCI slots.  The min/rec specs for TW2007 is 16MB/128MB graphics.  Does anyone have an opinion if the GF 5200, 6200(256), or ATI 9250 have enough PCI horsepower to play this game well?

 

Thanks in advance for any and all replies