So i cant help but notice that 99% of gamespot people have only 5-10% of their game reviews list as having anything below 70% score. Does EVERYBODY really love EVERY game they play that much?

This really doesnt help to gauge your judgments in games if the worst game on your review list is a 7.5. If this was a school system that is still a very passing grade, so based on that you've never played a bad game or one you didnt like?

I also really dont understand how so many people (especially these days) can give so many 9 and 10 scores to so much. What is a 10 ranking mean to you? Doesnt that mean you cant do any better? Theres absolutely nothing you would improve on the game at all, and its the greatest game of all time? Theres no bugs whatsoever, the gameplay is the best you've ever encountered, and the system is balanced like nothing you've ever known? What about the storyline? or hackers?

I have several games that i personally like that have received lower scores due me feeling the product wasnt as competitive as its peers in some way or another. How do you rate games? Do you actually have an opinion or are you just an unofficial fanboi sales person for their company?

Cmon folks, i want to see some criticism on even your favorite of games. Just because you have something you think could be improved does not necessarily mean you dont endorse the product.

Also how many of you guys play through the games, THEN review them. I cant help but wonder how many people get into the game after a few hours and write their reviews at that time without a larger idea as to the bulk of the games actual content.

Who among you actually have something to say?